J . Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 8399-8401
8399
Sch em e 1
Th e 2-Meth ylsu lfon yl-3-p h en yl-1-p r op -2-
en yloxyca r bon yl (Msp oc)Am in o-P r otectin g
Gr ou p
Louis A. Carpino* and E. M. E. Mansour†
Department of Chemistry, University of Massachusetts,
Amherst, Massachusetts 01003-4510
Received March 29, 1999
Recently a new N-R-amino protecting group, the 1,1-
dioxobenzo[b]thiophene-2-ylmethyloxycarbonyl (Bsmoc)
residue 1, useful for peptide synthesis, was described.1
ments of methanesulfonyl chloride to â-methylstyrene
followed by elimination of hydrogen chloride and subse-
quent free radical bromination of the methyl group
(Scheme 1). This synthetic route, in contrast to that used
for the related Bsmoc system, does not involve a low-
valent, and therefore possibly unpleasant, sulfur inter-
mediate at any stage. Another difference appears to be
the greater ease with which the Mspoc acid fluorides are
obtainable in crystalline form, as contrasted to undefined
foams or amorphous materials. The stereochemistry of
5 and 6 was assigned on the basis of related reactions8
and the expected two-step process of trans addition
followed by trans elimination. For introduction of the
Mspoc residue, alcohol 8 was converted to the chlorofor-
mate and N-hydroxysuccinimide carbonate.
The Bsmoc and Mspoc groups, being â-substituted, are
similar in their lesser sensitivity toward premature
deblocking relative to the related 2-(tert-butylsulfonyl)-
2-propenoxycarbonyl (Bspoc) residue but differ from each
other regarding the byproducts formed upon piperidine-
induced deblocking. In the case of Bsmoc, the initial
Michael-like adduct quickly isomerized completely to the
final stable adduct, whereas in the case of Mspoc, an
equilibrium mixture of the two adducts resulted (eq 1, n
) 5). According to 1H NMR analysis the initial adduct 9
The key deblocking step in the case of amines protected
by the Bsmoc group involves the addition of a nucleophilic
reagent to the R,â-unsaturated sulfone system of 1 with
the consequent ejection of the carbamate anion. Among
the major advantages of such a process over systems for
which the deblocking step involves a classic â-elimination
process (e.g., the 2-(methylsulfonyl)ethoxycarbonyl, Msc,2
or 9-fluorenylmethyloxycarbonyl, Fmoc,3 systems) are
that (a) lower concentrations of piperidine or weaker
bases (e.g., morpholine) can be used for deblocking, thus
minimizing base-catalyzed side reactions, and (b) ap-
plication to the technique of rapid continuous solution
synthesis4 is greatly improved. Examples of peptide
assembly via both solid phase and rapid solution tech-
niques using these protecting groups have also been
presented.4
The Bsmoc residue was conceived in response to the
demonstration that the initially investigated protecting
group in this category, the 2-tert-butylsulfonyl-2-prope-
noxycarbonyl (Bspoc) residue 2, in certain cases suffered
premature deblocking by the amino group liberated
during the deblocking process.5 By affixing a substituent
at the â-position of 2, as in the Bsmoc residue 1, reactivity
at this position is moderated and such side reactions are
not observed. A second â-substituted system of this type,
the Mspoc residue 3, is described in this note.
Alcohol 8, key precursor of the 2-methylsulfonyl-3-
phenyl-1-prop-2-enyloxycarbonyl (Mspoc) residue, was
obtained from the corresponding allylic bromide 76 by
formate-catalyzed hydrolysis.7 The bromide was synthe-
sized according to the method of Doomes and Overton,6
which involves Cu(OAc)2-catalyzed addition of the ele-
predominated over 10 at the beginning (about 3/1), but
after 30 min the ratio changed to 1/1.6 and did not change
thereafter. Upon substitution of pyrrolidine for piperi-
dine, deblocking was both more rapid and more specific,
in that under conditions where the latter required 30 min
for complete deblocking the former was complete after
only 8 min. The initial adduct 9 (n ) 4) was only
fleetingly visible, and complete conversion to 10 (n ) 4)
occurred quickly. Thus for practical purposes, particularly
if quantitative UV tracking is desirable, it would be
preferable to adopt pyrrolidine for Mspoc deblocking.
As in the case of the Bsmoc residue, the Mspoc group
was shown to be sensitive to base-catalyzed mercaptan
† On leave of absence from the Department of Chemistry, Faculty
of Science, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.
(1) Carpino, L. A.; Philbin, M.; Ismail, M.; Truran, G. A.; Mansour,
E. M. E.; Iguchi, S.; Ionescu, D.; El-Faham, A.; Riemer, C.; Warrass,
R.; Weiss, M. S. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 9915.
(2) Tesser, G. I.; Balvert-Geers, I. C. Int. J . Pept. Protein Res. 1975,
7, 295.
(3) Carpino, L. A. Acc. Chem. Res. 1987, 20, 401.
(4) Carpino, L. A.; Ismail, M.; Truran, G. A.; Mansour, E. M. E.;
Iguchi, S.; Ionescu, D.; El-Faham, A.; Riemer, C.; Warrass, R. J . Org.
Chem. 1999, 64, 4324.
(5) Carpino, L. A.; Philbin, M. J . Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 4315.
(6) Doomes, E.; Overton, B. M. J . Org. Chem. 1987, 52, 1544.
(7) Harris, M.; Bull, M. J . Synth. Commun. 1985, 15, 1225.
(8) (a) Kamigata, N.; Karushima, T.; Sawada, H.; Kobayashi, M.
Bull. Chem. Soc. J pn. 1984, 57, 1421. (b) Auvray, P.; Knochel, P.;
Normant, J . F. Tetrahedron 1988, 44, 6095.
10.1021/jo990541a CCC: $18.00 © 1999 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 10/08/1999