4
V. Yim et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. xxx (2016) xxx–xxx
activity with IC50 values above 5000 nM. This highlights the impor-
tance of the KDK motif for binding to the integrin-binding loop of
the ADAM8 disintegrin domain.
RP-HPLC was performed on a Dionex P680 system using a Waters
XTerraÒ C18 column (5
min. A linear gradient of 0.1% TFA/H2O (solvent A) and 0.1% TFA/
CH3CN (solvent B) was used with detection at 210 nm. Preparative
RP-HPLC was performed on a Waters 600 System with a Waters
2487 dual wavelength absorbance detector using a Waters XTerraÒ
l
m, 4.6 ꢁ 150 mm) at a flow rate of 1 mL/
In our third series, we endeavoured to transpose both the argi-
nine and leucine analogues which gave the best results within the
b-alanine series to our new b-homoserine lead peptide 3. We
indeed hoped to observe a synergistic effect by introducing two
favourable substitutions simultaneously within the parent peptide
1. Interestingly, while peptides 17 and 19 showed increased activ-
ity compared to their b-alanine analogues 7 and 9, with a ꢀ4- and
ꢀ1.5-fold lower IC50, respectively, it did not produce the similar
10-fold increase in potency observed in our first series when
b-homoserine was employed in place of b-alanine. Despite peptide
19 being the most active analogue of our library, it only exhibited
slightly higher inhibition than peptide 3. In this series we also
further investigated the effect of modifying the arginine residue.
In b-homoserine-containing peptides 16 and 18, the nitroarginine
and the homoarginine were used in place of arginine, respectively.
As previously observed introducing charged and bulky residues at
this position had detrimental effects on the activity with a ꢀ8- and
ꢀ2-fold increase in IC50 with respect to 3. Although 17 showed
improved inhibition activity compared to its b-alanine analogue
7, it remained less active than 3, thus suggesting that the prevailing
interaction in the binding of 17 to its receptor occurs through the
side-chain of the b-homoserine rather than that of the citrulline.
The lack of a significant synergic effect observed in this series sug-
gests that structural modifications which maximise the interaction
of one residue, concurrently hinder the interaction of the other
residue with the receptor.
Prep MS C18 column (10
l
m, 19 ꢁ 300 mm) at a flow rate of
10 mL/min. Gradient systems were adjusted according to the
elution profiles and peak profiles obtained from the analytical
RP-HPLC chromatograms.
O-(7-azabenzotriazol-1-yl)-N,N,N0,N0-tetramethyluronium hex-
afluorophosphate (HATU), O-(benzotriazol-1-yl)-N,N,N0,N0-tetram-
ethyluronium
hexafluorophosphate
(HBTU)
and
O-(6-
Chlorobenzotriazol-1-yl)-N,N,N0,N0-tetramethyluronium hexafluo-
rophosphate (HCTU) were purchased from Advanced ChemTech.
N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF) and acetonitrile (CH3CN) (synthe-
sis grade) were purchased from Scharlau, and CH2Cl2 (synthesis
grade) from ECP. Diisopropylethylamine (iPr2NEt), piperidine,
triisopropylsilane (iPr3SiH), 4-(dimethylamino)pyridine (DMAP),
N-methylmorpholine (NMM) were purchased from Sigma–Aldrich.
N,N-Diisopropylcarbodiimide (DIC) was purchased from GL Bio-
chem. 4-(4-hydroxymethyl-3-methoxyphenoxy) butyric acid
(HMPB) was purchased from Merck. Trifluoroacetic acid (TFA)
was purchased from Oakwood Chemicals. L-Amino acids were used
unless otherwise stated. Fmoc-amino acids were purchased from
GL Biochem, ChemImpex Inc., or PolyPeptide Laboratory. The cata-
lyst Pd(PPh3)4 and aminomethyl PS resin19 were synthesised
18
according to published procedures.
In conclusion, we have identified two new strategies for the
design of potent ligands of ADAM8 disintegrin domain. One con-
sists of taking advantage of the receptor binding site involving
the polar interaction observed with peptide 3 while the second
focused on exploiting the hydrophobic pocket which is believed
to be responsible for the improved binding of peptides 8–10.
3.2. General peptide synthesis procedures
Solid phase peptide synthesis (0.2 mmol scale) was performed
on aminomethyl PS resin (1.0 mmol/g) based on the Fmoc based
strategy. HMPB linker was attached to the resin using general
method A, and coupling of the first amino acid residue to the
HMPB-PS resin was performed according to general method B or
C. The degree of attachment of the first amino acid residue to the
resin was determined using UV spectrophotometry.16 The desired
peptide sequences were synthesised using general method D on
TributeTM peptide synthesiser, and peptide coupling of unnatural
amino acids was performed manually according to general method
E. The linear peptides were cleaved from the resin using general
method F, and the crude products were cyclised using general
method G. The side-chain protecting groups were removed from
the cyclised peptides according to general method H, and the allyl
protecting group was removed according to general method I. The
crude peptides were purified according to general method J.
2.3. Conclusion
During this SAR study of the potent cyclo(RLsKDK) ADAM8 inhi-
bitor, two prevalent modes of interactions between the ligand and
the receptor were identified. Two peptidomimetics; cyclo(RLhSb-
KDK) 3 and cyclo(RhLAbKDK) 9; were found to present slightly
increased activity compared to the lead peptide. Although the
activity could not be significantly improved, these compounds
could serve as potential new lead structures replacing cyclo
(RLsKDK) for future SAR studies. Furthermore, it was established
that Based on these promising results, additional work focusing
on the design of a ligand capable of taking advantage of both the
interaction sites described herein is on-going in our laboratory.
3.2.1. General method A: attachment of HMPB linker to
aminomethyl PS resin
Aminomethyl PS resin (0.2 mmol) was swollen in CH2Cl2/DMF
(1/1, v/v) for 20 min and the solvent was drained. HMPB (4 equiv)
was dissolved in DMF/CH2Cl2 (3 mL, 5/95 v/v), and DIC (4 equiv)
was added. The mixture was added to the resin, and the reaction
was agitated for 2 h. The solution was drained, and the resin was
washed with DMF (3ꢁ), CH2Cl2 (3ꢁ) and then air dried.
3. Experimental
3.1. General information
All reagents were purchased as reagent grade and used without
further purification. HPLC solvents were purchased as HPLC grade
and used without further purification. UV measurements were
obtained using a Jenway 7315 spectrophotometer. Electrospray
ionisation mass spectra (ESI-MS) were recorded on an Agilent
Technologies 1120 Compact LC connected to a HP Series 1100
MSD spectrometer or a Bruker micrOTOF-Q II spectrometer. Sam-
ples were introduced using direct flow injection at 0.2 mL/min into
an ESI source in positive mode, using 0.1% formic acid/H2O and
0.1% formic acid/CH3CN (1/1, v/v). Major and significant fragments
were quoted in the form x m/z (mass to charge ratio). Analytical
3.2.2. General method B: attachment of Fmoc-hSb(OtBu)-OH,
Fmoc-b-Ala-OH, or Fmoc-Asp-OAll to HMPB-PS resin
To a solution of Fmoc protected amino acid (2 equiv) in DMF/
CH2Cl2 (3 mL, 20/80 v/v) was added DIC (2 equiv), and the mixture
was added to the HMPB-PS resin. DMAP (1 equiv) was added to the
resin, and the reaction was stirred under MW irradiation (25 W,
50 °C) for 1 h. The solution was drained, and the resin was washed
with DMF (3ꢁ) and CH2Cl2 (3ꢁ) and then air dried.