12
NIKOORAZM AND KHANMORADI
the other hand, the use of a higher temperature improved
the yield (Table 6, entry 8). To consider the solvent effect
on the model reaction, several solvents were tested
(Table 6, entries 10, 11), and water was selected as the
optimal solvent in terms of activity and selectivity
(Table 6, entry 8). Water as an attractive solvent has high
dielectric constant, high cohesive energy density, and
high internal pressure, and it is nontoxic, nonflammable,
and inexpensive. Consequently, 20 mg of catalyst, water
as solvent, and 90ꢀC as the suitable temperature were
selected as the best condition for the reaction (Table 6).
To examine the generality of the green procedure for
the synthesis of 2,3-dihydroquinazolin-4. (1H)-ones, we
carried out the reactions of 2-aminobenzamideand with
other aromatic and aliphatic aldehydes under similar
optimized reaction conditions, as given in Table 7.
The reusability of the catalyst was investigated under
the optimum reaction conditions for (a) the oxidation of
methyl phenyl sulfide, (b) the oxidative coupling of
thiophenol and (c) the synthesis of 2-(4-chlorophenyl)-2,-
3-dihydoquinazolin-4(1H)-one. After the completion of
the reaction, the catalyst was separated via centrifuga-
tion. Then, it was dried and reused for subsequent experi-
ments. The reaction was performed six times over VO–
vanillin-MCM-41 as the heterogeneous catalyst without
any detectable change in its activity (Figure 7).
in all described reactions, with similar catalytic activity
and selectivity as the original one.
ORCID
REFERENCES
[1] E. Zamanifar, F. Farzaneh, J. Simpson, M. Maghami, Inorg.
Chim. Acta 2014, 414, 63.
[2] M. Nikoorazm, A. Ghorbani-Choghamarani, M. Khanmoradi,
Appl. Organomet. Chem. 2016, 30, 236.
[3] M. Khanmoradi, M. Nikoorazm, A. Ghorbani-Choghamarani,
Appl. Organomet. Chem. 2017, 31, 3693.
[4] F. Gregori, I. Nobili, F. Bigi, R. Maggia, G. Predieri, G. Sartori,
J. Mol. Catal. A Chem. 2008, 286, 124.
[5] Z. G. Xiong, J. Zhang, X. M. Hu, Appl. Catal. A. Gen. 2008,
334, 44.
[6] A. Ghorbani-choghamarani, S. Sardari, Chin. J. Catal. 2010,
31, 1347.
[7] X. Lang, J. Zhao, X. Chen, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55,
4697.
[8] Q. Pu, M. Kazemi, M. Mohammadi, Mini. Rev. Org. Chem.
2019, 16, 5775.
[9] L. Chen, A. Noory Fajer, Z. Yessimbekov, M. Kazemi,
M. Mohammadi, J. Sulfur Chem. 2019, 40, 451.
[10] A. R. Hajipour, S. E. Mallakpour, H. J. Adibi, Org. Chem. 2002,
67, 8666.
Also, to test whether the metal was leaching out from
the solid catalyst during the reaction, ICP analysis was
performed on the recovered catalyst. Based on this analy-
sis, the vanadium content in the recovered VO–vanillin-
MCM-41 catalyst was 0.166 mmol/g. That is, compared to
the fresh catalyst, the recycled catalyst was truly
heterogeneous.
[11] M. Kirihara, Y. Asai, S. Ogawa, T. Noguchi, A. Hatano,
Y. Hirai, Synthesis 2007, 21, 3286.
[12] S. G. Kim, D. K. Park, W. J. Suck, J. S. Lee, S. K. Seong,
M. H. Chung, Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2008, 81, 470.
[13] A. Saxena, A. Kumar, S. Mozumdar, J. Mol. Catal. A Chem.
2007, 269, 35.
[14] C. C. Silveira, S. R. Mendes, Tetrahedron Lett. 2007, 48, 7469.
[15] S. Ghammamy, M. Tajbakhsh, J. Sulfur Chem. 2005, 26, 145.
[16] L. Menini, M. C. Pereira, A. C. Ferreira, J. D. Fabris,
E. V. Gusevskaya, Appl. Catal. A. Gen. 2011, 392, 151.
[17] D. Jiang, G. Pan, B. Zhao, G. Ran, Y. Xie, E. Min, Appl. Catal.
A. Gen. 2000, 2011, 69.
5 | CONCLUSIONS
[18] M. Kazemi, M. Mohammadi, Appl. Organomet. Chem. 2019,
34, e5400.
[19] V. Labade, P. Shinde, M. Shingare, Tetrahedron Lett. 2013, 54,
5778.
[20] M. Nikoorazm, A. Ghorbani-Choghamarani, M. Khanmoradi,
RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 56549.
[21] K. R. Saxena, M. A. Khan, Indian J. Chem. 1989, 26, 443.
[22] T. Singh, V. K. Srivastava, S. Sharma, A. Kumar, Indian
J. Chem. 2006, 45, 2558.
[23] A. N. Gangwal, U. R. Kothawade, A. D. Galande, D. S. Pharande,
A. S. Dhake, Indian J. Heterocyl. Chem. 2001, 10, 291.
[24] R. Tyagi, B. Goel, V. K. Srivastava, A. Kumar, Indian J. Pharm.
Sci. 1998, 60, 283.
[25] A. Kumar, M. Tyagi, V. K. Srivastava, Indian J. Chem. 2003,
42, 2142.
[26] A. R. Raghu Ram, R. H. Bahekar, Indian J. Chem. 1999,
38, 434.
[27] N. Mizuno, K. Kamata, Coord. Chem. Rev. 2011, 255, 2358.
The successful preparation of the VO–vanillin-MCM-41
catalyst demonstrated that the sol–gel method as a simple
method to prepare the nanometer-sized, highly effective,
heterogeneous catalyst. The prepared catalyst was charac-
terized by different techniques and applied in the prepara-
tion of sulfoxides, disulfides, and 2,3-dihydroquinazolin-4
(1H)-one derivatives. The results showed its several advan-
tages such as high efficiency, short reaction times, general-
ity, good to excellent yield of the desired products,
simplicity, capability of carrying out oxidation reaction in
green media, ease of product isolation, avoidance of haz-
ardous solvents, and use of vanillin as ligand on the sur-
face of nPrNH2–MCM-41, which is very low cost,
nontoxic, and in general agreement with the principles of
green chemistry, as demonstrated in this paper. Further-
more, the catalyst could be recycled and reused six times