structures [Ag(3,3A-dicyanodiphenylacetylene)2]XF6 (X = P,
As, Sb), which we reported recently.3a These structures
crystallized in space group P1 and the topology is twofold
(b)
(a)
¯
interpenetrated sheets that are very similar to those shown in
Fig. 1. However, for the 3,3A-dicyanodiphenylacetylene struc-
tures, closest-packing arises from the interdigitation of helices
of opposite handedness3a rather than the crisscrossing of such
helices. As a result, left- and right-handed helices propagate
along the same axis such that the opposite twist sense associated
with these helices cancel out, and the structures are non-polar
¯
(P1). The difference in the packing between the structure
presented here and those of 3,3A-dicyanodiphenylacetylene may
be a result of the para-nitrile group of ligand 1, which changes
the conformation of the 2/1 helix. This comparison demon-
strates the value of viewing solid-state packing in terms of
helices in order to better understand gross structure. An
increased understanding of solid-state packing is essential if
self-assembled materials possessing novel properties are to be
designed.
We acknowledge the US Department of Energy through the
Materials Research Laboratory at the University of Illinois
(Grant DEFG02-96ER45439) for financial support of this work.
We also thank the School of Chemical Sciences Materials
Characterization Laboratory at the University of Illinois for
X-ray data collection.
Fig. 2 (a) Fourfold interpenetration in [Ag(1)2]SbF6 2 resulting from the
crisscrossing of an orthogonal pair of twofold interpenetrated sheets. The
blue and yellow networks constitute one set of twofold sheets and the red
and green networks constitute the other. The arrows indicate the directions
of propagation for the orthogonal sheets. Fourfold interpenetration is shown
from left to right in a blue–green–yellow–red sequence where the
orthogonal sheets cross. (b) Two views of p–p stacking of cyanobenzoyl
rings of compound 1 as a result of fourfold interpenetration. Stacking occurs
between ligands of orthogonal sheets along the polar c-axis. The direction
of the c-axis is indicated for the bottom projection. The plane-to-plane
distance for this stacking interaction is 3.35 Å.
Footnotes and References
* E-mail: moore@aries.scs.uiuc.edu
† Crystal data for 2: orthorhombic, space group Ccc2 (no. 37),
a = 18.9697(5), b = 21.25190(10), c = 7.5365(2) Å, U = 3038.21(11)
Å3, Dc = 1.837 g cm23, Z = 4, M = 840.09, Mo-Ka, Lp corrected, 9596
reflections collected at 275 °C, 3589 unique reflections. The structure was
solved using SHELXS and was refined using SHELXTL. 3586 Reflections
(b)
(a)
2
refined based on Fo by full-matrix least squares; number of
parameters = 237; R1 = SıFoı 2 ıFcı)/SıFoı = 0.0570 (for Fo > 4s)
1
2
2
2
2
2
and 0.1086 (for all data); wR2 = [S(wıFo 2 Fc ı)/SwıFo ı ] = 0.0804
(for Fo > 4s) and 0.1042 (for all data); GOF = 1.171. The space group
choice was confirmed using the CALC MISSYM option of PLATON (A. L.
Spek, J. Appl. Crystallogr., 1988, 21, 578) as no extra crystallographic
symmetry was detected. CCDC 182/684.
1 J. S. Moore and S. Lee, Chem. Ind., 1994, 556; G. A. Ozin and
C. L. Bowes, Adv. Mater., 1996, 8, 13.
2 K. A. Hirsch, S. R. Wilson and J. S. Moore, Chem. Eur. J., 1997, 3,
765.
3 (a) K. A. Hirsch, S. R. Wilson and J. S. Moore, Inorg. Chem., 1997, 36,
2960; (b) K. A. Hirsch, D. Venkataraman, S. R. Wilson, J. S. Moore and
S. Lee, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 1995, 2199; (c) D. Venkatara-
man, S. Lee, J. S. Moore, P. Zhang, K. A. Hirsch, G. B. Gardner,
A. C. Covey and C. L. Prentice, Chem. Mater., 1996, 8, 2030; (d)
L. R. MacGillivray, S. Subramanian and M. J. Zaworotko, J. Chem. Soc.,
Chem. Commun., 1994, 1325; (e) L. Carlucci, G. Ciani, D. M. Proserpio
and A. Sironi, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1995, 117, 4562.
4 G. B. Gardner, D. Venkataraman, J. S. Moore and S. Lee, Nature, 1995,
374, 792; D. Venkataraman, G. B. Gardner, S. Lee and J. S. Moore, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 1995, 117, 11 600; (c) B. F. Hoskins and R. Robson, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 1989, 111, 5962; (d) M. Fujita, Y. J. Kwon, S. Washizu and
K. Ogura, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1994, 116, 1151; (e) O. M. Yaghi, G. Li and
H. Li, Nature, 1995, 378, 703.
Fig. 3 The crisscrossing of orthogonal pairs of 2/1 helices in [Ag(1)2]SbF6
2. (a) Pairs of intertwined helices crisscross to afford fourfold inter-
penetration. Fourfold interpenetration is indicated by the arrow, which
highlights a yellow–red–blue–green sequence of silver(i) ions (balls).
Orthogonal helices are of opposite handedness. This point is clarified on the
right. (b) Two orthogonal pairs of helices separated to reveal mirror
symmetry. The blue and yellow helices are left-handed and the red and
green helices are right-handed.
along the same direction, a non-polar structure could have
formed. Such a packing of helices was observed in the sheet
Received in Columbia, MO, USA, 18th June 1997; Revised Manuscript
received 17th October 1997; 7/07574J
14
Chem. Commun., 1998