5 H, arom); dC (300 MHz, CDCl3) 39.6 (q, CH3), 44.3 [q, N(CH3)2], 56.2
(t, CH2 ), 126.6, 128.0, 128.8 (arom), 135.6 (s, arom), 217.6 (s, CO cis),
223.4 (s, CO trans), 277.5 (s, CNCr); m/z (EI) 368 [M+]. For (Z)-1: mp
85 °C; dH (300 MHz, CDCl3) 2.65 [s, 6 H, N(CH3)2], 2.70 (s, 3 H, CH3),
4.95 (s, 2 H, CH2Ph), 7.40–7.20 (m, 5 H, arom); dC (300 MHz, CDCl3) 39.1
(q, CH3), 44.2 [q, N(CH3)2], 48.9 (t, CH2), 125.2, 127.8, 129.3 (arom),
133.5 (s, arom), 218.4 (s, CO cis), 225.2 (s, CO trans), 280.6 (s, CNCr); m/z
(EI) 368 [M+]. For 3: mp 123–6 °C; n (Nujol)/cm21 1997, 1888–1830 (CO);
dH (80 MHz, CDCl3) 2.73 (s, 3 H, CH3), 2.78 [s, 6 H, N(CH3)2], 4.65 (s, 2
H, CH2Ph), 7.05–7.55 (m, 5 H, arom); m/z (FAB+) 340 [M+]. For 5a: mp
120 °C (decomp.); n (Nujol)/cm21 1998 (CO trans), 1917–1803 (CO cis);
dH (80 MHz, CDCl3) 1.50 (t, 3 H, CH2CH3), 2.65 (q, 2 H, CH2CH3), 2.80
[s, 6 H, N(CH3)2], 4.65 (s, 2 H, CH2Ph), 7.10–7.45 (m, 5 H, arom); dC (300
MHz, CDCl3) 13.0 (q, CH3), 34.7 (q, CH3), 49.1 (t, CH2 ), 52.3 [q,
N(CH3)2], 126.1, 128.5, 129.5 (arom), 133.5 (s, arom), 218.5 (s, 2CO cis),
230.1 (s, CO cis), 232.2 (s, CO trans), 294.7 (s, CNCr); m/z (FAB+) 354
[M+]. Spectroscopic and analytical data for complexes 4a, 4b, 5b and 6 are
in line with the reported structure.
Bn
Me
N
i
Me
5a
Me
N
(CO)4Cr
Me
6
Scheme 3 Reagents and conditions: BunLi (1 equiv.), THF, N2, 278 °C, 30
min, then MeI, 278 °C, 10 min then 0 °C, 20 min, then room temp., 10
min
C(14)
C(15)
C(7)
C(16)
C(13)
C(6)
C(12)
C(11)
§ Crystal data for 5a: C16H18CrN2O4, Mr = 354.32, monoclinic, space
C(5)
N(2)
O(4)
C(4)
group C2/c,
a
=
21.346(6),
=
b
=
12.782(4),
8, rcalc
c
=
14.136(4) Å,
C(10)
b
=
113.70(2)°, V
3532(2) Å3, Z
=
=
1.333 Mg m23
,
F(000) = 1472, l = 1.54184 Å, m(Cu-Ka) = 5.507 mm21. Crystal
dimensions: 0.15 3 0.21 3 0.33 mm. The intensity data were collected by
means of a Siemens AED diffractometer using the q–2q scan technique at
room temperature. 3494 reflections were measured (with q in the range
3–70°) of which 3357 were independent and included in the structural
refinement. Correction for absorption was applied (maximum and minimum
values for the transmission coefficient were 1.000 and 0.637). The structure
was solved by means of direct and Fourier methods, and refined using full-
matrix least-squares procedures (based on Fo2), with anisotropic thermal
parameters in the last cycles of refinement for all of the non-hydrogen
atoms. The hydrogen atoms were introduced into the geometrically
calculated positions and refined riding on the parent atoms. The refinement
converged at wR2 = 0.1579 for all data, and 209 variables [R1 = 0.0506 for
O(1)
C(1)
O(3)
Cr
C(3)
C(9)
N(1)
C(8)
C(2)
O(2)
Fig. 1 View of the molecular structure of complex 5a together with the
atomic numbering system. Selected bond distances (Å) and angles (°): Cr–
C(5) 2.028(4), Cr–N(1) 2.221(4), C(5)–N(2) 1.308(7), N(1)–N(2) 1.451(5),
N(2)–C(10) 1.481(6), C(5)–C(6) 1.494(7); N(1)–Cr–C(5) 62.9(2), Cr–
C(5)–N(2) 101.3(3), Cr–N(1)–N(2) 88.5(2), N(1)–N(2)–C(5) 107.3(3),
N(1)–N(2)–C(10) 120.8(3), C(5)–N(2)–C(10) 131.8(4).
1603 reflections with I
>
2s(I)]; min/max residual electron density:
20.356/0.408
e
Å23
. The SHELXS-86 and SHELXL-93 computer
programs were used (ref. 6). CCDC 182/726.
value found in complexes of Cr0 with tertiary amines (2.21 Å),
the 2.028(4) Å Cr–C(5) bond length is much shorter than those
found in aminocarbene complexes of Cr0 (in the range of
2.123–2.156 Å).5 This means that the Cr–C(5) bond has a more
noticeably double bond character than the other aminocarbene
complexes. It is also worth noting that the 1.813(6) Å Cr–C(1)
bond involving the carbonyl trans to the aminic N(1) atom is
shorter than other Cr–C(carbonyl) bonds [in the range
1.871(5)–1.882(5) Å].
1 (a) H. Fischer and G. Roth, J. Organomet. Chem., 1995, 490, 229; (b)
R. Aumann, B. Jasper and R. Fro¨hlich, Organometallics, 1995, 14,
2447.
2 E. O. Fischer and R. Aumann, Chem. Ber., 1968, 101, 963.
3 R. Imwinkelried and L. S. Hegedus, Organometallics, 1988, 7, 702.
4 K. H. Do¨tz and C. G. Kreiter, Chem. Ber. , 1976, 109, 2026.
5 J. A. Connor and O. S. Mills, J. Chem. Soc. A, 1969, 334; H. Rudler,
A. Parlier, R. Yefsah, B. Denise, J.-C. Daran, J. Vaissermann and
C. Knobler, J. Organomet. Chem., 1988, 358, 245; R. Aumann,
S. Althaus, C. Kruger and P. Betz, Chem. Ber., 1989, 122, 357; A. Parlier,
N. Rudler, H. Rudler, R. Goumont, J.-C. Daran and J. Vaissermann,
Organometallics, 1995, 134, 2760.
We thank the M.U.R.S.T. and the C.N.R. of Rome, and the
European
community
(HCM
Programme,
contract
ERBCHRXCT940501), for their financial support.
6 G. M. Sheldrick, SHELXS-86 Program for the solution of crystal
structures, University of Go¨ttingen, 1986; SHELXL-93 Program for
crystal structure refinement, University of Go¨ttingen, 1993.
Notes and References
† E-mail: maior@icil64.cilea.it
‡ Selected data for (E)-1: mp 57 °C (decomp.); dH (300 MHz, CDCl3) 2.45
[s, 6 H, N(CH3)2], 3.05 (s, 3 H, CH3), 5.55 (s, 2 H, CH2Ph), 7.40–7.20 (m,
Received in Liverpool, UK, 6th November 1997; 7/08018B
384
Chem. Commun., 1998