1920 Organometallics, Vol. 17, No. 10, 1998
Communications
F igu r e 1. X-ray structure of 2 with atomic numbering
scheme. Hydrogen atoms have been omitted for clarity.
Selected bond distances (Å): Ti(1)-N(2) 1.905(3), Ti(1)-
N(3) 1.875(3), Ti(1)-F(3) 2.028(2), Al(1)-N(1) 1.799(3),
Al(1)-F(1) 1.825(2), Al(1)-F(3) 1.773(2), Al(2)-N(2)
1.846(3), Al(2)-F(1) 1.791(2), Al(2)-F(2) 1.766(2), Al(3)-
N(1) 1.827(3), Al(3)-N(3) 1.934(3), Al(3)-F(2) 1.896(2).
F igu r e 2. X-ray structure of 3 with atomic numbering
scheme. Hydrogen atoms have been omitted for clarity.
Selected bond distances (Å): Zr(1)-N(2) 2.051(2), Zr(1)-
N(3) 1.998(2), Zr(1)-F(3) 2.125(1), Al(1)-N(1) 1.786(2),
Al(1)-F(1) 1.812(1), Al(1)-F(3) 1.786(1), Al(2)-N(2)
1.848(2), Al(2)-F(1) 1.795(1), Al(2)-F(2) 1.766(1), Al(3)-
N(1) 1.829(2), Al(3)-N(3) 1.944(2), Al(3)-F(2) 1.903(1).
to 117.41(8)° (N(1)-Al(3)-N(3)) in 3 and are smaller
than the exocyclic ones which vary from 107.3(2)° (F(1)-
Al(1)-C(1)) to 129.5(2)° (N(1)-Al(1)-C(1)) in 2 and
106.17(9)° (F(1)-Al(1)-C(1)) to 130.8(1)° (N(1)-Al(1)-
C(1)) in 3.
In summary, reactions of group 4 metal cyclopenta-
dienyl trifluorides lead to intramolecular fluorine-
nitrogen exchange, activation of metal-fluorine bonds,
and the formation of isostructural adamantane-like
cages. Moreover, the reported synthesis is a new route
to aluminum-containing mixed group 4 amidofluorides.
Ack n ow led gm en t. We are grateful for financial
support of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, the
(8) 2: A solution of 1 (980 mg, 1.5 mmol) in toluene (30 mL) was
added to a suspension of CpTiF3 (255 mg, 1.5 mmol) in toluene (50
mL). The mixture was then stirred for 36 h at room temperature, until
all of the solids had dissolved. The solvent was removed in vacuo, and
the residue was treated with n-hexane (30 mL), affording 2 as a red
compound. Yield: 860 mg (70%). Mp: 180 °C. 1H NMR (C6D6): δ (ppm)
-1.04 (d, AlCH3, 3 H), -0.65 (m, AlCH3, 3 H), -0.45 (m, AlCH3, 3 H),
1.13-1.42 (m, CH3(iPr), 36 H), 3.00 (sept, CH(iPr), 1 H), 3.25 (sept,
CH(iPr), 1 H), 3.60 (sept, CH(iPr), 1 H), 3.85 (sept, CH(iPr), 2 H), 4.10
(sept, CH(iPr), 1 H), 5.84 (s, CpH, 2 H), 5.97 (s, CpH, 1 H), 6.18 (s,
CpH, 1 H), 6.60 (s, CpH, 1 H), 7.05 (m, arom H, 9 H). 19F NMR (C6D6):
δ (ppm) -158.8 (d, 1 F), -133.3 (m, 1 F), -131.8 (m, 1 F). MS EI (m/
e): 162 (ArH, 100). IR (ν, cm-1): 1587, 1425, 1307, 1252, 1229, 1207,
1167, 1107, 1038, 1019, 930, 888, 870, 818, 796, 781, 760, 733, 714,
686, 641, 600, 570, 533. Anal. Calcd for C44H65Al3F3N3Ti: C, 64.3; H,
7.9; N, 5.1. Found: C, 63.8; H, 8.0; N, 5.1. 3: A solution of 1 (980 mg,
1.5 mmol) in toluene (30 mL) was added dropwise to a solution of η5-
C5H4(SiMe3)2ZrF3 (540 mg, 1.5 mmol) in toluene (50 mL). The mixture
was then stirred for 12 h at room temperature. The solvent was
removed in vacuo, and the residue was treated with n-hexane (30 mL),
affording 3 as a slightly yellow product. Yield: 1.21 g (80%). Mp: 236
°C. 1H NMR (C6D6): δ (ppm) -1.20 (m, AlCH3, 3 H), -0.65 (m, AlCH3,
3 H), -0.50 (m, AlCH3, 3 H), 0.25 (s, Si(CH3)3, 18 H), 1.13-1.34 (m,
CH3(iPr), 36 H), 3.25 (sept, CH(iPr), 3 H), 4.00 (sept, CH(iPr), 3 H),
6.05 (m, CpH, 1 H), 6.60 (m, CpH, 1 H), 7.05 (m, arom H, 9 H), 7.40
(m, CpH, 1 H). 19F NMR (C6D6): δ (ppm) -137.5 (m, 1 F), -132.5 (m,
1 F), -126.4 (m, 1 F). MS EI (m/e): 1007 (M+, 20), 162 (ArH, 100). IR
(ν, cm-1): 1617, 1589, 1425, 1383, 1310, 1260, 1202, 1167, 1088, 1074,
1019, 919, 892, 838, 799, 766, 724, 707, 680, 640, 612, 556, 473, 432.
Anal. Calcd for C50H81Al3F3N3Si2Zr: C, 59.5; H, 8.0; N, 4.2. Found: C,
58.7; H, 7.9; N, 4.1. It is known in the literature that the analysis of
carbon in aluminum compounds is often incorrect due to the generation
of noncombustable aluminum carbide.9
(10) The crystals were mounted on a glass fiber in a rapidly cooled
perfluoropolyether.11 Diffraction data were collected on
a
Stoe-
Siemens-Huber four-circle diffractometer coupled to a Siemens CCD
area-detector at 133(2) with graphite-monochromated Mo KR
K
radiation (λ ) 0.710 73 Å), performing æ and ω scans. The structures
were solved by direct methods using SHELXS-9612 and refined against
F2 on all data by full-matrix least squares with SHELXL-97.13 All non-
hydrogen atoms were refined anisotropically. All hydrogen atoms were
included in the model at geometrically calculated positions and refined
using a riding model. The disordered Cp ring in 2 was modeled with
the help of similarity restraints for 1-2 and 1-3 distances and
displacement parameters as well as rigid bond restraints for anisotropic
displacement parameters. The final fractional atomic coordinates are
given in the Supporting Information. Crystallographic data for 2:
C
44H65Al3F3N3Ti, M ) 821.83, crystal size: 0.30 × 0.10 × 0.05 mm3,
triclinic, P1h, unit cell dimensions a ) 9.284(2) Å, b ) 13.236(3) Å, c )
20.435(4) Å, R ) 75.53(3)°, â ) 85.01(3)°, γ ) 69.77(3)°, unit cell volume
2281.4(8) Å3, Z ) 2, Fcalcd ) 1.196 g cm-1, µ ) 0.290 mm-1; total number
of reflections measured 42 698, unique 7675 (Rint ) 0.0710). Data/
restraints/parameters: 7675/236/547. Final R indices: R1 ) 0.0682,
wR2 ) 0.1091 on data with I > 2σ(I) and R1 ) 0.1032, wR2 ) 0.1246
on all data, goodness-of-fit S ) 1.216; weighting scheme w-1 ) σ2(Fo)2
+ (0.0049P)2 + 4.4342P; largest difference peak and hole 0.596 and
-0.475 e A-3. Crystallographic data for 3‚0.5C6H14
: C53H88Al3F3N3-
Si2Zr, M ) 1052.64, crystal size 0.40 × 0.20 × 0.20 mm3 triclinic, P1h,
unit cell dimensions a ) 12.488(3) Å, b ) 12.638(3) Å, c ) 20.838(8) Å,
R ) 91.42(2)°, â ) 90.88(2)°, γ ) 117.524(9)°, unit cell volume 2914(2)
Å3, Z ) 2, Fcalcd ) 1.200 g cm-1, µ ) 0.319 mm-1; total number of
reflections measured 44 920, unique 13 269 (Rint ) 0.0383). Data/
restraints/parameters: 13269/0/620. Final R indices: R1 ) 0.0388, wR2
) 0.0765 on data with I > 2σ(I) and R1 ) 0.0536, wR2 ) 0.0825 on all
data, goodness-of-fit S ) 1.094. (R1 ) ∑||Fo| - |Fc||/∑|Fo|, wR2 )
[∑w(Fo2 - Fo2)2/∑w(Fo2)2]1/2, S ) [∑w(Fo2 - Fc2)2/∑(n - p)]1/2); weighting
scheme w-1 ) σ2(Fo)2 + (0.0144P)2 + 3.0498P; P ) [Fo2 + 2Fc2]/3; largest
(9) Paciorek, K. J . L.; Nakahara, J . H.; Hoferkamp, L. A.; George,
C.; Flippen-Anderson, J . L.; Gilardi, R.; Schmidt, W. R. Chem. Mater.
1991, 3, 82.
difference peak and hole: 0.405 and -0.303 e A-3
(11) Kottke, J .; Stalke, D. J . Appl. Crystallogr. 1993, 26, 615.
.