4534
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 4534-4535
Synthesis of the First Members of a New Class of
Biologically Active Bryostatin Analogues
Paul A. Wender,* Jef De Brabander, Patrick G. Harran,
Juan-Miguel Jimenez, Michael F. T. Koehler, Blaise Lippa,
Cheol-Min Park, and Makoto Shiozaki
Department of Chemistry, Stanford UniVersity
Stanford, California 94305-5080
ReceiVed August 7, 1997
The bryostatins are a novel family of emerging cancer
chemotherapeutic candidates isolated from marine bryozoa on the
basis of their significant activity against murine P388 lymphocytic
leukemia.1 These macrolactones have been shown to exhibit
remarkable and unique activities,2 leading to the recent entry of
bryostatin 1 (Figure 1) into Phase II clinical trials for the treatment
of melanoma, non-Hodgkins lymphoma, and renal cancer.3 While
their molecular mode of action is not known, the bryostatins
potently inhibit the binding of the tumor-promoting phorbol esters
to protein kinase C (PKC) and stimulate enzymatic activity both
in vitro and in vivo.4 However, they induce only a subset of
phorbol ester responses and block those actions of phorbol esters
which they themselves do not initiate, most notably tumor
promotion.5 Efforts to identify the structural basis for these and
related activities and to develop more effective clinical candidates
have been hampered by the low natural abundance1b of the
bryostatins and difficulties associated with their modification. As
an alternative approach to these goals, we describe here the first
class of simplified, synthetic bryostatin analogues which exhibit
a high affinity for PKC and potent growth inhibitory activity
against several human cancer cell lines.
Figure 1.
Scheme 1a
Computational studies,6 limited structure-activity data,1b,6,7 and
analogy to diacylglycerol, the endogenous activator of PKC,
suggest that the binding of bryostatin to PKC could be attributed
to substituents at C1, C19, and C26 (boxed in Figure 1), whose
orientations are remotely controlled by a lipophilic spacer (shaded
in Figure 1). Macrocycles of the general structure 1 were
designed to test this hypothesis. These systems retain the putative
recognition domain of the bryostatins but incorporate a simplified
spacer domain to facilitate their synthesis. This design allows
access to 1 through a novel, convergent esterification-mac-
rotransacetalization strategy involving coupling of the recognition
domain (2) with variable spacers (3), an approach which has
potential for the creation of analogue libraries.
a (a) 4, 2 equiv of LDA, THF, -78 °C, 1 h then 5, -78 °C, 30 min,
98%. (b) cat. pTsOH, toluene, room temperature (rt), 6a (41%), 6b
(49%). (c) 6a, NaBH4, CeCl3‚7H2O, MeOH, -20 °C. (d) m-CPBA,
NaHCO3, 2:1 CH2Cl2/MeOH, 71%, two steps. (e) PhCOCl, DMAP,
CH2Cl2, -10 °C; Dess-Martin periodinane, rt, 90%. (f) SmI2, THF,
MeOH, -78 °C, 95%. (g) LDA, OHCCO2Me, THF, -78 °C, 90%
based on recovered 8. (h) ClSO2Me, Et3N, CH2Cl2, -10 °C. (i) DBU,
THF, rt, 78%, two steps. (j) NaBH4, CeCl3‚7H2O, MeOH, -20 °C. (k)
C7H15CO2H, 2,4,6-trichlorobenzoyl chloride, Et3N, toluene, rt, 93%,
two steps. (l) HF/pyridine, THF, rt. (m) Dess-Martin periodinane,
CH2Cl2, rt, 86%, two steps. (n) allyl-BEt2, Et2O, -10 °C. (o) Ac2O,
DMAP, CH2Cl2, 95%, two steps. (p) cat. OsO4, NMO, THF/H2O. (q)
Pb(OAc)4, Et3N, PhH; DBU, rt, 80%, two steps. (r) DDQ, CH2Cl2,
H2O, 79%. (s) HF, CH3CN, H2O, rt, g95%.
Our first objective in this study was the synthesis of the
bryostatin C-ring and its attendant functionality (C15-C27).8
Scheme 1 depicts a first-generation sequence which has readily
(1) (a) Pettit, G. R.; Herald, C. L.; Doubek, D. L.; Herald, D. L.; Arnold,
E.; Clardy, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1982, 104, 6846-6848. (b) The bryostatin
family of macrolactones currently numbers 20: Pettit, G. R. J. Nat. Prod.
1996, 59, 812-821.
(2) (a) Kraft, A. S.; Woodley, S.; Pettit, G. R.; Gao, F.; Coll, J. C.; Wagner,
F. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 1996, 37, 271-278. (b) Szallasi, Z.; Du,
L.; Levine, R.; Lewin, N. E.; Nguyen, P. N.; Williams, M. D.; Pettit, G. R.;
Blumberg, P. M. Cancer Res. 1996, 56, 2105-2111 and references therein.
(3) Current information on the scope and status of bryostatin clinical trials
protsrch.shtml.
(4) (a) Kraft, A. S.; Smith, J. B.; Berkow, R. L. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
U.S.A. 1986, 83, 1334-1338. (b) Berkow, R. L.; Kraft, A. S. Biochem.
Biophys. Res. Commun. 1985, 131, 1109-1116. (c) Ramsdell, J. S.; Pettit,
G. R.; Tashjian, A. H., Jr. J. Biol. Chem. 1986, 261, 17073-17080.
(5) Gschwendt, M.; Fu¨rstenberger, G.; Rose-John, S.; Rogers, M.; Kittstein,
W.; Pettit, G. R.; Herald, C. L.; Marks, F. Carcinogenesis 1988, 9, 555-562.
(6) (a) Wender, P. A.; De Brabander, J.; Harran, P. G.; Jimenez, J.-M.;
Koehler, M. F. T.; Lippa, B.; Park, C. M.; Siedenbiedel, C.; Pettit, G. R.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., in press. (b) Wender, P. A.; Cribbs, C. M.;
Koehler, K. F.; Sharkey, N. A.; Herald, C. L.; Kamano, Y.; Pettit, G. R.;
Blumberg, P. M. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1988, 85, 7197-7201.
(7) Pettit, G. R.; Sengupta, D.; Blumberg, P. M.; Lewin, N. E.; Schmidt,
J. M.; Kraft, A. S. Anti-Cancer Drug Des. 1992, 7, 101-113.
delivered gram quantities of the target fragment 15. Condensation
of the dienolate of 49 with aldehyde 510 followed by acid-catalyzed
(8) Bryostatin fragment syntheses: (a) De Brabander, J.; Vandewalle, M.
Pure Appl. Chem. 1996, 68, 715-718. (b) Kalesse, M.; Eh, M. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1996, 37, 1767-1770. (c) Lampe, T. F. J.; Hoffmann, H. M. R.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 7695-7698. (d) Ohmori, K.; Nishiyama, S.;
Yamamura, S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 36, 6519-6522. (e) For a review
covering bryostatin synthesis through the end of 1994, including work from
the groups of Evans, Hale, Roy, Vandewalle, and Yamamura and Masamune’s
total synthesis of bryostatin 7, see: Norcross, R. D.; Paterson, I. Chem. ReV.
1995, 95, 2041-2114.
S0002-7863(97)02763-7 CCC: $15.00 © 1998 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 04/23/1998