9062
J. Chem. Phys., Vol. 110, No. 18, 8 May 1999
Chiang, Ma, and Shr
As CH3SHϩ and CH2S are the only plausible structures
formation, too. The average value of the ⌬H0f0 difference
between our values and the literature values for CH3SHϩ2 ,
CH3SHϩ, and CH2SHϩ is 0.2 eV, close to the kinetic shift
for the channel to form CH2SSHϩ according to the RRKM
calculation. A perfect match of both values and the common
phenomenon involving H transfers mutually support assign-
ments to CH2SSHϩ, CH3SH2ϩ, CH3SHϩ, and CH2SHϩ.
b. Dissociation channels of CH3SSCHϩ3 proposed for
wavelengths below 1100 Å. Six fragment ions with m/z
ϭ15, 27, 35, 45, 64, and 78 were observed and assigned as
CHϩ3 , C2Hϩ3 , SH3ϩ, HCSϩ, S2ϩ, and CH2Sϩ2 , respectively.
These fragment ions are formed at dissociation energies
much higher than those for the dissociation channels dis-
cussed above. With more dissociation channels in competi-
tion, the kinetic shifts for channels producing these fragment
ions are expected to be large and more difficult to evaluate.
Moreover, as these fragment ions are observed for the first
time, no relevant datum such as ab initio molecular orbital
calculations and dissociation rates is available to aid in the
explanation of dissociation properties. It becomes difficult to
assign neutral partners solely from the determined AE, let
alone derivation of heats of formation of these fragment ions.
Therefore, we simply list these fragment ions and some neu-
tral fragments in Table II, and discuss them briefly in what
follows.
on the basis of energy considerations and the available ther-
mochemical data in the literature, the fragmentation channels
of CH3SHϩϩCH2S and CH2SϩϩCH3SH proposed here do
not follow Stevenson’s rule. Our assignments for these chan-
nels are consistent with those of Ruseic and Berkowitz that
were determined from the relative shifts between the respec-
tive AEs of fragmentation channels.20 Butler’s assignment
for CH2SHϩ is also consistent with ours, but not for CHSHϩ
and CH2SHϩ2 .7 A possible explanation is that their values at
170.0, 216.2, 208.0, and 234.1 kcal/mol derived from their
low AEs are lower than the literature values, except for 216.2
kcal/mol, which is probably due to an adopted value that is
too low, ⌬H0f0͑CH2S͒ϭ25.1 kcal/mol, for the neutral.
͑2͒ C2H5Sϩ (m/zϭ61): The AE of C2H5Sϩ at 10.50
Ϯ0.05 eV determined in this work is 0.42 eV higher than the
10.08 eV reported at 298 K, but near the value of 10.28 eV at
0 K derived from statistical fitting of decay rates by Butler
et al.7 Regarding the RRKM dissociation rates calculated by
Ma et al.,9 a large kinetic shift for the channel forming
C2H5Sϩ is expected due to the very tight transition structure
which leads to an energy dependence of the dissociation rate
rising very slowly with excess energy. A kinetic shift of 0.28
eV is derived if we take the difference between our AE at
10.50 eV and the IE at 8.20 eV of CH3SSCH3 and subtract
from it the activation energy at 2.02 eV obtained from the
RRKM calculation by Ma et al.9 This value agrees satisfac-
torily with the 0.28 eV derived from the RRKM/QET ͑quasi-
equilibrium theory͒ decay rates calculated by Butler et al.7
Using our new AE at 10.50 eV, the derived kinetic shift of
0.28 eV, and heats of formation of SH and CH3SSCH3 at 0 K
listed in Table III, we obtain ⌬H0f0͑C2H5Sϩ͒р201 kcal/mol
from Eq. ͑1͒. Compared with theoretical predictions
⌬H0f0ϭ236.5 (CH3CH2Sϩ͒, 192.6 (cis-CH3CHSHϩ), 192.6
(trans-CH3CHSHϩ), and 195.3 (CH3SCHϩ2 ) kcal/mol, our
value is nearer 195.3 (CH3SCHϩ2 ) kcal/mol.23 Thus, we as-
sign the isomer CH3SCHϩ2 as the most probable structure,
consistent with results from collisional activation, PD–PI,
and theoretical prediction.7,44,45
To form Sϩ2 , loss of two CH3 groups is the most direct
and simple way. If this is the case, these two CH3 losses
must be consecutive, which means that at least part of the
m/zϭ79 ion must be the unrearranged CH3Sϩ2 ion formed at
photon energies higher than the 11.12 eV onset. On the basis
of an energy consideration, two three-body formation pro-
cesses, SHϩ3 ϩCH3ϩCS and C2H3ϩϩH2SϩSH, are also as-
sumed. Formation of C2Hϩ3 likely occurs through a tight tran-
sition structure to form a C–C bond, while SHϩ3 may involve
H transfer.
IV. CONCLUSIONS
͑3͒ CH3Sϩ2 (m/zϭ79): The AE of CH3Sϩ2 at 11.12
Ϯ0.05 eV determined here is significantly higher than the
weak onset at 10.15 eV reported by Butler et al.,7 but agrees
with their strong onset at 11.10 eV. Our value also agrees
with 11.07 eV reported for photoionization of jet-cooled
CH3SSCH3 by Ma et al.9 Ma et al. estimated a large kinetic
shift of 0.2 eV for the channel forming CH3Sϩ2 , and
thus derived ⌬H0f0͑fragment ion͒ϭ213 kcal/mol, near
⌬H0f0͑CH2SSHϩ͒ϭ211 kcal/mol predicted from their ab ini-
tio calculation. With this result, they claim the structure of
CH2SSHϩ instead of CH3SSϩ proposed by Butler et al. to be
the most likely structure formed near the onset at 11.07 eV.
As the kinetic shift cannot be estimated from our measured
AE alone, the structure of CH2SSHϩ proposed by Ma et al.
was adopted in Table II.
Dissociative photoionization of CH3SSCH3 into chan-
nels to form CHϩ3 , C2Hϩ3 , CH3SCHϩ2 , HCSϩ, SH3ϩ, CH2Sϩ,
CH2SHϩ, CH3SHϩ, CH3SH2ϩ, Sϩ2 , CH2Sϩ2 , and CH2S2Hϩ is
effected with a molecular beam/QMS/TPES setup coupled to
a synchrotron light source. According to measured photoion-
ization efficiency spectra of the parent ion and 12 fragment
ions, the branching ratios of these ions as a function of pho-
ton energy were derived in the photon energy region at
ϳ8–25 eV. The IE of CH3SSCH3 and the AEs of observed
fragment ions were determined from signals occurring above
the intersection of the baseline and the rising edge, both fit-
ted to a line by least squares. The AEs thus derived for
formation of CH2Sϩ, CH2SHϩ, CH3SHϩ, CH3SHϩ2 , and
CH2S2Hϩ are more consistent with recent studies of
CH3SSCH3 and similar molecules. Based on the determined
AE and existing thermochemical data, plausible structures of
some fragment ions and their neutral counterparts were pro-
posed. Isomerization instead of simple cleavage of the C–S
bond or the S–S bond seems to be a common step in these
dissociative processes.
Formation of CH2SSHϩ implies that the dissociation
channel proceeds through a transition structure involving H
migration. We note that the proposed fragment ions of
CH3SHϩ2 , CH3SHϩ, and CH2SHϩ, from a comparison with
⌬H0f0 in the literature, seem to involve H transfers for their
129.120.242.61 On: Tue, 02 Dec 2014 12:35:29