7566 J . Org. Chem., Vol. 66, No. 23, 2001
Burlingham and Widlanski
rate of reaction was plotted as a function of inhibitor concen-
tration. In this plot, IC50 is equal to the opposite of the
x-intercept.
mL). The ether layer was collected and washed with 30 mL of
10% aq sodium hydroxide followed by 30 mL of brine. The
ether layer was dried over magnesium sulfate, and the ether
was removed in vacuo. The crude material was purified by
silica gel column chromatography (2a : 1:1 Hex:EtOAc; 2b: 2:1
Hex:EtOAc).
Diben zyl N-Ben zyl-N-(m eth ylsu lfon yl)p h osp h or a m i-
d a te (2a ). Yield: Method A: 61% isolated, Method B: 64%
colorless oil: 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 2.76 (s, 3H), 4.68
(d, J ) 10.8 Hz, 2H), 5.04 (m, 4H), 7.2-7.35 (m, 15H) ppm;
13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 42.21, 51.54, 69.75 (d, J ) 5.3
Hz), 128.04, 128.16, 128.39, 128.49, 128.61, 128.89, 135.03 (d,
6.9 Hz), 136.21 ppm; 31P NMR (121 MHz, CDCl3): -0.14 ppm;
IR (neat): 1165, 1275, 1355 cm-1; HRFABMS (M + H) calcd
for C22H25NO5PS 446.1191, found 446.1194.
Diben zyl N-Ben zyl-N-(p h en ylsu lfon yl)p h osp h or a m i-
d a te (2b). Yield: Method A: 77%, Method B: 61% white
solid: mp 77-78 °C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 4.67 (d, J
) 11.6 Hz, 2H), 4.93 (m, 4H), 7.20-7.76 (m, 15H) ppm; 13C
NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 52.07, 69.60 (d, J ) 5.3 Hz) 127.77,
127.85, 128.18, 128.28, 128.51, 128.57, 128.62, 128,75, 133.06,
135.21 (d, J ) 7.6 Hz), 136.34, 139.92 ppm; 31P NMR (121
MHz, CDCl3): 0.23 ppm; IR (thin film): 1010, 1173, 1276,
1367, 3066 cm-1; HRMS (M + H) calcd for C27H27NO5PS
508.1348, found 508.1368.
Diben zyl N-Ben zyl-N-(tr iflu or om eth ylsu lfon yl)p h os-
p h or a m id a te (2c). Yield: Method A: 44%, Method B: 0%
colorless oil: 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 4.77 (d, J ) 11.6
Hz, 4H), 4.90 (t, J ) 10.4 Hz, 2H), 7.18-7.53 (m, 15H) ppm;
13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 54.10, 70.59 (d, J ) 5.3 Hz),
119.55 (q, J ) 323 Hz), 128.12, 128.56, 128.61, 128.80, 129.35,
134.55 (d, J ) 7.9 Hz), 135.20 ppm; 31P NMR (121 MHz,
CDCl3): -2.75 ppm; 19F NMR (282 MHz, CDCl3): δ -74.56
ppm; IR (neat): 1015, 1139, 1230, 1288, 1403 cm-1; HRMS
(M - H) calcd for C22H20F3NO5PS 498.0752, found 498.0750.
Gen er a l P r oced u r e for th e P r ep a r a tion of N-Su lfon yl-
p h osp h or a m id ic Acid s (3). Dibenzyl N-benzyl-N-sulfonyl-
phosphoramidate (2) (0.5 mmol) was dissolved in 2 mL of
ethanol. Approximately 50 mg of 10% activated palladium on
carbon was added to the reaction. The flask was sealed and
evacuated in vacuo, followed by introduction of an H2 atmo-
sphere. After 2 h, the reaction flask was purged with nitrogen
and the solution was filtered through Celite. The ethanol was
evaporated in vacuo to yield 3a ,b quantitatively, with no need
for further purification. 3c was not stable as the free acid, but
could be isolated as the triethylammonium salt by dissolving
the crude product in triethylamine/bicarbonate buffer and
evaporating the buffer in vacuo.
N-(Meth ylsu lfon yl)p h osp h or a m id ic Acid (3a ). White,
highly hygroscopic solid: 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 3.13
(s) ppm; 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 42.90 ppm; 31P NMR
(121 MHz, CDCl3): -4.62 ppm; IR (neat): cm-1; HRFABMS
(M + H) calcd for CH7NO5PS 175.9781, found 175.9783.
N-(P h en ylsu lfon yl)p h osp h or a m id a ic Acid (3b). White
solid: mp147-148 °C (148-149 °C);24 1H NMR (400 MHz,
CDCl3): δ 7.51-7.98 (m) ppm; 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ
128.20, 129.99, 133.87, 143.44 ppm; 31P NMR (121 MHz,
CDCl3): -5.15 ppm; IR (KBr): 1182, 1215, 1332, 2363, 2413,
3229 cm-1; HRMS (M + H) calcd for C6H9NO5PS 237.9939,
found 237.9950.
Tr ieth yla m m on iu m N-(Tr iflu or om eth ylsu lfon yl)p h os-
p h or a m id a te (3c). White, hygroscopic solid: mp 81-83 °C;
1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 1.27 (t, J ) 6.4 Hz, 9H), 3.08
(q, J ) 6.4 Hz, 6H) ppm; 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.03,
45.77, 121.41 (q, J ) 322 Hz) ppm; 31P NMR (121 MHz, CDCl3):
-2.33 ppm; 19F NMR (282 MHz, CDCl3): δ -79.87 ppm IR
(KBr): 1165, 1206, 1266, 1476, 2491, 2677, 2976 cm-1; HR-
FABMS (M + H) calcd for C13H34F3N3O5PS 432.1909, found
432.1900.
N-Su lfon ylp h osp h or a m id a tes a s Su bstr a tes of Alk a -
lin e P h osp h a ta se. The relative rates of hydrolysis of pNPP
and N-sulfonylphosphoramidates 3a -c were followed by de-
tection of inorganic phosphate release, detected by the method
of Lanzetta et al.15 To 1 mL of 500 µM substrate was added
enzyme (20 µL of 395 nM/mL bovine AP, or 15 µL of 1.71 U/mL
E. coli AP). At time points (0-60 min), 100 µL aliquots of the
reaction solution were quenched into 800 µL of molybdenate
color indicator (ꢀ ) 78 000 Abs/M). After 60 s, the color
indicator was quenched with 100 µL of 34% sodium citrate
solution. After 1 h, the absorbances of these solutions were
measured at 660 nm. Blanks contained 100 µL of 500 µM
substrate with no enzyme mixed with 800 µL of color indicator
and quenched as above. Initial rates (∼10%) were determined
from the slope of the line of a plot of the concentration of
inorganic phosphate released as a function of time.
N-P h en ylp h osp h or a m id a te (5b) a s
a Su bstr a te of
Alk a lin e P h osp h a ta se. The relative rates of hydrolysis of
pNPP and N-phenylphosphoramidates 5b was followed by
detection of inorganic phosphate release, detected by a varia-
tion of the method of Lanzetta, et al.15 To 1 mL of 500 µM
substrate was added enzyme (20 µL of 395 nM/mL bovine AP,
or 15 µL of 1.71 U/mL E. coli AP.) At time points (0-60 min),
100 µL aliquots of the reaction solution were quenched into
800 µL of molybdenate color indicator (ꢀ ) 70 000 Abs/M). After
6 s, the color indicator was quenched with 100 µL of 34%
sodium citrate solution. (Because the substrate is not stable
under the acidic assay conditions, the assay was quenched
quickly, resulting in only 10% loss of sensitivity.) After 1 h,
the absorbances of these solutions were measured at 660 nm.
Blanks contained 100 µL of 500 µM substrate with no enzyme
mixed with 800 µL of color indicator and quenched as above.
Initial rates (∼10%) were determined from the slope of the
line of a plot of the concentration of inorganic phosphate
released as a function of time.
Gen er a l P r oced u r e for th e P r ep a r a tion of Diben zyl
N-Ben zyl-N-su lfon ylp h osp h or a m id a t es (2). Met h od A:
Br om op h osp h a te. N-Benzylsulfonamide (1a -c) (1 mmol)
was dissolved in 2 mL of dry tetrahydrofuran and added
dropwise to sodium hydride (1.1 mmol) that had been pre-
washed in 5 mL of pentane. After stirring for 45 min, no gas
evolution was visible. Tribenzyl phosphite22 (1.5 mmol) was
dissolved in 2 mL of dry methylene chloride at 0 °C. Bromine
(1.45 mmol), dissolved in 3 mL of methylene chloride, was
added to the phosphite with stirring over the course of 5 min.
After 10 min, the solution was warmed to room temperature
and stirred an additional 15 min. To the deprotonated sulfon-
amide solution at -30 °C was added the phosphorylating
reagent, dropwise over 10 min. The reaction was warmed to
room temperature and allowed to stir for 60 min. The solvent
was removed in vacuo, and the residue was partitioned
between 25 mL of ether and 25 mL of 1 M HCl. The ether
layer was collected and washed with brine (25 mL) and then
dried over magnesium sulfate. The ether was removed in
vacuo, and the crude material was purified by silica gel
chromatography (2a : 1:1 Hex:EtOAc; 2b: 2:1 Hex:EtOAc;
2c: 2:1 Hex:Et2O). Meth od B: P h osp h or a m id a te. N-Benzyl-
sulfonamide(1) (1 mmol) and 1-H-tetrazole (1 mmol) were
dissolved/suspended in 2 mL of dry methylene chloride.
Dibenzyl diisopropylphosphoramidite23 (1 mmol) was added to
the reaction dropwise. Upon stirring for 1 h, the solution grew
clear and then cloudy. The solution was cooled to -40 °C, and
m-CPBA (2 mmol), in 3 mL of methylene chloride, was added
dropwise. After stirring the reaction for 1 h, the reaction was
allowed to warm to room temperature. The solvent was
evaporated in vacuo, and the crude material was partitioned
between ether (30 mL) and 10% aq sodium bicarbonate (30
Gen er a l P r oced u r e for th e P r ep a r a tion of Diben zyl
P h osp h or a m id a te (4). Tribenzyl phosphite22 (2 mmol) was
(22) Saady, M.; Lebeau, L.; Mioskowski, C. Helv. Chim. Acta 1995,
78, 670-678.
(23) J enkins, D. J .; Riley, A. M. Potter, B. V. L. J . Org. Chem. 1996,
61, 7719-7726.
(24) Houmbold, W.; Becke-Goering, M. Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 1967,
352, 113-121.