MeLi as Reductant, Nucleophile, and Base
Organometallics, Vol. 18, No. 7, 1999 1157
Syn th esis of (η4-exo-MeC5H5)F e(CO)2P (OMe)3 (3). Com-
pound 1 (1.519 g, 5.0 mmol) and P(OMe)3 (0.60 mL, 0.621 g,
5.0 mmol) were taken up in dry THF (90 mL), and the solution
was chilled to -78 °C. Excess MeLi (5.0 mL, 15% ether
solution) in ether (30 mL) maintained at -78 °C was added
dropwise to the stirred mixture over a period of 15 min. The
stirring was continued at -78 °C for 1 h before the mixture
was warmed gradually to room temperature and continuously
stirred for another 1 h. The reaction mixture was filtered
through a glass frit containing a short column of alumina to
obtain a clear yellow solution. The solvent was then removed
by rotary evaporation. The resultant oily concentrates were
packed on a column of nonactivated alumina by dry packing
and then eluted with 10% ethyl acetate in hexane. Only one
yellow band separated on the column. The fraction was
collected, and after solvent removal, the resultant yellow oil
was frozen in liquid nitrogen for 1 h to obtain yellow solids of
3 (0.711 g, 44.9%). Mp: 38-39 °C. IR (CH2Cl2): νCO 1979 vs,
Also shown in Scheme 2, the 6 reaction with MeLi at
-78 °C is the deprotonation and not the methylation of
the η5-C5H5 ring; i.e., MeLi works as a base rather than
a nucleophile. An intramolecular migration of the
-P(O)(OMe)2 group from Fe to the η5-C5H5 ring follows,
effectively making the Fe anion instead of the C anion
the site for a MeI quench to produce [η5-C5H4P{(O)-
(OMe)2}]Fe(CO){P(OMe)3}Me (7; 89%). Nakazawa re-
ported the -P(O)Ph2 group migration in (η5-C5H5)Fe-
(CO){P(OMe)Ph2}{P(O)Ph2} employing a LDA/MeI
sequence.13
The difference in MeLi reactions toward 4 and 6 could
be rationalized by the Fe back-bonding to CO ligands,
as revealed from the IR νCO stretching frequenciess
2040, 1990 cm-1 for 4 and 1964 cm-1 for 6. The higher
IR νCO stretching frequencies associated with 4 suggest
that there is less back-bonding and hence there is more
positive charge on the CO carbon atoms, in favor of
receiving MeLi as a nucleophile. Compound 6, on the
other hand, has more back-bonding from Fe and hence
has less positive charge on the CO carbon atom,
disfavoring the reception of MeLi at the CO site. MeLi
works as a base as a consequence. The fact that MeLi
attacks one of the CO sites in 4 and the η5-C5H5 ring in
6 could be attributed to a steric affect as well.
Overall 7 could be prepared in one flask, starting from
a mixture of 1 and excess P(OMe)3, plus trace MeLi as
an initiator at -78 °C. With evolution time, temperature
increase, and decrease, and then the MeLi/MeI se-
quence, the reaction gives 7 in yields comparable to the
stepwise operation. The MeI produced at the Arbuzov-
like reaction stage could be removed under vacuum for
use as a quencher in the end or simply destroyed with
extra MeLi during deprotonation in the MeLi/MeI
sequence.
In summary, a mixture of 1 and P(OMe)3 detects the
three roles of MeLi. The addition of MeLi dropwise
without delay to the 1:1 mixture results in 3, where
MeLi is both a reductant and a nucleophile. On the
other hand, the addition of a catalytic amount of MeLi
to the mixture of 1 and excess P(OMe)3, with a delay
time applied before the MeLi/MeI sequence, results in
7, where MeLi is both a reductant and a base.
1916 vs cm-1
.
31P NMR (CDCl3): δ 189.5. 1H NMR (CDCl3): δ
3
5.2 (b, 2H, -CHdCHCHMe-), 3.52 (d, J PH ) 12 Hz, 9H,
4
OMe), 2.80-2.79 (b, 3H, -CHdCHCHMe-), 0.41 (d, J PH ) 6
2
Hz, 3H, Me). 13C NMR (CDCl3): δ 217.5 (d, J PC ) 21.2 Hz,
CO), 81.1 (s, -CHdCHCHMe-), 57.7 (b, OMe), 51.3 (s, -CHd
3
CHCHMe-), 51.2 (s, -CHdCHCHMe-), 28.5 (d, J PC ) 6.6
Hz, Me). MS (FAB): m/z 316 (M+). Anal. Calcd for C11H17
-
FeO5P: C, 41.79; H, 5.43. Found: C, 41.72; H, 5.35.
Syn th esis of [(η5-C5H5)F e(CO)2P (OMe)3+][P F 6-] (2‚P F 6).
(η5-C5H5)Fe(CO)2Cl (0.50 g, 2.35 mmol) and P(OMe)3 (0.29 g,
2.35 mmol) were dissolved in THF (50 mL) and the solution
was maintained at -78 °C. A few drops of MeLi in ether were
added to the solution, resulting in a yellow precipitate in 5
min. NH4PF6 (0.38 g, 2.35 mmol) was then added to the
suspension. After 30 min, the temperature of the mixture was
slowly raised to room temperature over ca. 1 h. After filtration,
the filtrate was removed in vacuo. The yellow residue was
extracted with CH2Cl2 (30 mL) and reprecipitated on dilution
with hexane to give yellow crystals of 2‚P F 6 (0.71 g, 68%). IR
(CH2Cl2): νCO 2072, 2025 cm-1
.
1H NMR (CDCl3): δ 5.76 (s,
3
5H, Cp), 3.95 (d, J PH ) 12 Hz, 9H, Me). 31P NMR (acetone-
1
d6): δ 160.8 (s, P(OMe)3), -145.0 (hep, J PF ) 706 Hz, PF6).
(lit.10 IR (CH2Cl2) νCO 2073, 2032 cm-1; 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 5.64
3
(d, J PH ) 1.1 Hz, 5H, Cp)).
Syn th esis of (η5-C5H5)F e(CO)2P (O)(OMe)2 (4). Com-
pound 1 (0.51 g, 1.7 mmol) was mixed with P(OMe)3 (0.21 g,
1.7 mmol) in THF (30 mL) at -78 °C. A few drops of MeLi in
ether were then added to the solution. After about 2 min, a
pale yellow precipitate formed that slowly disappeared to
finally give a yellow solution when the temperature was raised
from -78 °C to room temperature over a period of 45 min.
The solvent was removed in vacuo. The yellow oily residue
was dissolved in minimum amount of CH2Cl2 and transferred
to a silica gel column made up with CH2Cl2. A yellow band,
obtained on elution with CH2Cl2, was a mixture of 3 and (η5-
C5H5)Fe(CO)2Me (70 mg). The second yellow band, collected
on elution with 1:1 acetone/MeOH, gave after the solvent
removal yellow solids of 4 (0.35 g, 1.2 mmol, 70%). IR (CH2-
Exp er im en ta l Section
Gen er a l Con sid er a tion s. All manipulations were per-
formed under an atmosphere of prepurified nitrogen with
standard Schlenk techniques. All solvents were distilled from
an appropriate drying agent.20 Infrared spectra were recorded
in CH2Cl2 using CaF2 optics on a Perkin-Elmer 852 spectro-
photometer. The 1H NMR and 13C NMR spectra were obtained
on Bruker AC200/AC300 spectrometers, with chemical shifts
reported in δ values, downfield positive, relative to the residual
solvent resonance of CDCl3 (1H δ 7.24, 13C δ 77.0). The 31P
NMR spectra were obtained on Bruker AC200/AC300 spec-
trometers using 85% H3PO4 as an external standard (δ 0.00).
Cl2): νCO 2040, 1990 cm-1
.
1H NMR (CDCl3): δ 4.99 (s, 5H,
3
Cp), 3.51 (d, J PH ) 11.5 Hz, 6H, Me). 31P NMR (CDCl3): δ
111.81. 13C NMR (CDCl3): δ 210.86 (d, J PC ) 40.5 Hz, CO),
2
2
85.74 (Cp), 51.14 (d, J PC ) 7.9 Hz, Me) (lit.11 IR (CH2Cl2) νCO
1
3
2040, 1990 cm-1; H NMR (CDCl3) δ 5.08 (d, J PH ) 1.8 Hz,
3
5H, Cp), 3.63 (d, J PH ) 11.0, 6H, Me); 31P NMR (CDCl3) δ
The melting points were determined on
a Yanaco MPL
melting-point apparatus and are uncorrected. (η5-C5H5)Fe-
(CO)2X (X ) Cl, I) was prepared according to the literature
procedure.21 Other reagents were obtained from commercial
sources and used without further purification.
109.2).
Rea ction of 4 w ith MeLi. Compound 4 (0.30 g, 1.05 mmol)
was suspended in THF (30 mL) at -78 °C. MeLi in THF/
cumene (1:9) solution (1.2 mL × 1 M) was added dropwise to
the mixture. The temperature of the mixture was slowly raised
to room temperature for 30 min to give a yellow solution: IR
(20) Perrin, D. D.; Armarego, W. L. F.; Perrin, D. R. Purification of
Laboratory Chemicals; Pergamon Press: Oxford, U.K., 1981.
(21) (a) Dombek, B. D.; Angelici, R. J . Inorg. Chim. Acta 1973, 7,
345. (b) Meyer, T. J . J ohnson, E. C.; Winterton, N. Inorg. Chem. 1971,
10, 1673. (c) Inorg. Synth. 1971, 12, 36. (d) Inorg. Synth. 1963, 7, 110.
νCO 1922, 1560 cm-1 31P NMR δ 160.8. After the solvent was
;
removed in vacuo, an air-sensitive and hygroscopic yellow solid
was obtained that was resistant to purification nonetheless.