A direct comparison with HCN was also examined (eq
2). The reaction proceeded smoothly when 3 equiv of HCN
was used, and 3a was obtained in 86% yield with 56% ee.
Although the enantioselectivity was not as high as under the
conditions using TMSCN (Table 2, entry 1), these results
strongly suggest that HCN is a key reagent in this reaction.
Next, we examined the scope of the aldimine substrates
in the presence of 10 mol % each of 1 and La(OPh)3,
i-PrCO2H or AcOH (50 mol %), and TMSCN (1.5 equiv) in
EtCN at -20 °C (Table 3). For N-protection, a CHPh2 group
Figure 1. Nonlinear effect between 1 and 3a.
Table 3. 1-La(OPh)3-Catalyzed Strecker Reactiona
oligomeric complexes. However, ESI-MS analysis of the
catalyst, which was prepared in situ from La(OPh)3 (1 equiv)
and 1 (1 equiv) in AcOH (5 equiv) and MeCN, suggested
the dominant generation of monomeric La(III) complexes,
[Ar*(SO3)2La(MeCN)n]+ (Ar*(SO3H)2 ) 1, n ) 1-4). The
observed species may be derived from a parent complex
[Ar*(SO3)2La(OAc)(MeCN)n]+,11 since the pKa value of
HCN is smaller than that of AcOH.12 Although further
investigation is necessary to obtain a clear understanding,
postulated catalytic cycles are shown in Figure 2 as a working
model. Acidic R′CO2H (R′ ) Me or i-Pr) provides a
counteranion for La(III) and generates HCN via proton-
reaction
timeb (h)
yieldb
(%)
eeb c (%)
,
entry
R
1
Ph
20 [20]
20 [24]
20 [16]
20 [20]
20 [18]
86 [96]
24 [20]
96 [20]
86 [72]
92 [96]
20 [48]
86 [98]
92 [78]
97 [97]
95 [96]
99 [96]
97 [83]
97 [96]
64 [28]
97 [99]
68 [79]
99 [98]
84 (S) [84 (S)]
88 (S) [88 (S)]
90 (S) [85 (S)]
86 [74]
86 [80]
92 (R) [76 (R)]
83 [84]
2
4-ClC6H4
4-MeOC6H4
3,4-OCH2OC6H3
3-furyl
2-thienyl
3-thienyl
2-Naph
3
4
5
6
7
8
92 (S) [85 (S)]
80 (S) [64 (S)]
52 [66]
9
PhCHdCH
PhCtC
10
11
(8) Shibasaki’s pioneering work and a review with La(III) catalysts: (a)
Sasai, H.; Suzuki, T.; Arai, S.; Arai, T.; Shibasaki, M J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1992, 114, 4418. (b) Shibasaki, M.; Yoshikawa, N. Chem. ReV. 2002, 102,
2187. Recent work: (c) Kato, N.; Mita, T.; Kanai, M.; Therrien, B.; Kawano,
M.; Yamaguchi, K.; Danjo, H.; Sei, Y.; Sato, A.; Furusho, S.; Shibasaki,
M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 6768. (d) Tosaki, S.; Hara, K.;
Gnanadesikan, V.; Morimoto, H.; Harada, S.; Sugita, M.; Yamagiwa, N.;
Matsunaga, S.; Shibasaki, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 11776. (e)
Morimoto, H.; Lu, G.; Aoyama, N.; Matsunaga, S.; Shibasaki, M. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 9588. (f) Handa, S.; Nagawa, K.; Sohtome, Y.;
Matsunaga, S.; Shibasaki, M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 3230. (g)
Lu, G.; Morimoto, H.; Matsunaga, S.; Shibasaki, M. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. 2008, 47, 6847. (h) Sone, T.; Yamaguchi, A.; Matsunaga, S.; Shibasaki,
M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 10078.
t-Bu
41 (S) [33 (S)]
a Prior to the reaction, the catalyst was prepared in situ from 1 and
La(OPh)3 in EtCN at 60 °C for 1 h. Then, 2, i-PrCO2H, and TMSCN were
poured into the heterogeneous suspension at -20 °C. b Data in brackets
are the result when AcOH was used in place of i-PrCO2H. c Absolute
configurations are shown in parentheses.
gave the best result (Supporting Information).2a,b,j,3c,d,g The
reactions of aromatic and heteroaromatic aldimines bearing
electron-withdrawing and electron-donating groups pro-
ceeded in high yields with moderate to high enantioselec-
tivities (entries 1-8). In particular, 4-MeOC6H4-
CHdNCHPh2 and 2-thienylCHdNCHPh2 gave each of the
products with over 90% ee in high yields (entries 3 and 6).
R,ꢀ-Unsaturated aldimines gave the corresponding products
with moderate to good enantioselectivities (entries 9 and 10),
although aliphatic aldimine gave poor enantioselectivity
(entry 11).
(9) Reviews of asymmetric catalyses with chiral lanthanide complexes:
(a) Kobayashi, S. Synlett 1994, 689. (b) Aspinall, H. C. Chem. ReV. 2002,
102, 1807. (c) Molander, G. A.; Romero, A. C. Chem. ReV. 2002, 102,
2161. (d) Shibasaki, M.; Yokikawa, N. Chem. ReV. 2002, 102, 2187. (e)
Inanaga, J.; Furuno, H.; Hayano, T. Chem. ReV. 2002, 102, 2211. (f)
Kobayashi, S.; Sugiura, M.; Kitagawa, H.; Lam, H. W.-L. Chem. ReV. 2002,
102, 2227. (g) Mikami, K.; Terada, M.; Matsuzawa, H. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. 2002, 41, 3554.
(10) La2(CO3)3, La(OTs)3, and La(NO3)3·6H2O showed low catalytic
activity with poor enantioselectivity. Moreover, other La(OAr)3 complexes
(Ar ) Ph, 3,5-xylyl, mesityl, 2,6-Ph2C6H3) did not affect the enantioselec-
tivity of 3.
(11) The possibility of the complexes, [Ar*(SO3)2La(CN)(MeCN)n]+,
cannot be denied.
Finally, we examined the mechanistic aspects. Based on
the observation of a positive nonlinear effect between 1 and
3a (Figure 1), the structure of enantiomerically pure La(III)
catalysts in situ might involve a mixture of monomeric and
(12) pKa of HCN is 12.9 in DMSO and 9.1 in H2O. The pKa of AcOH
is 12.3 in DMSO and 4.75 in H2O: Taft, R. W.; Bordwell, F. G. Acc. Chem.
Res. 1988, 21, 456.
(13) For the full generation of HCN (1.5 equiv) in situ, a ratio of R′CO2H
(0.5 equiv) and TMSCN (1.5 equiv) is disputable. PhOH (0.3 equiv) released
via ligand exchange and adventitious water also may be involved as protone
sources. Moreover, it is notable that the equiliblium among a product,
TMSCN, PhOTMS, HCN, and PhOH has been proposed by Shibasaki et
al. in ref 4c.
(6) Hatano, M.; Maki, T.; Moriyama, K.; Arinobe, M.; Ishihara, K. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 16858.
(7) Solubility of the corresponding complexes was low, and the reaction
conditions were heterogeneous.
Org. Lett., Vol. 11, No. 11, 2009
2323