MENTORING STUDENT RESEARCH
121
change. If you edit the paper for them with a red pen, they will tend to make correc-
tions without understanding why the change was needed. By indicating that some-
thing they have written is “Error #32,” the students then need to locate the error on
the numbered list and determine what change is needed.
FINAL ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION STAGE
The second draft of the papers will take a few weeks for the main instructor to grade
and return to the students. During this time period, the laboratory instructor helps
the students do the correlation and quasi-experimental statistical analyses for their
data. The last assignment sheet is distributed, which includes additional directions
on how to do the correlation and t-test statistical analyses on SPSS (1998), how to
write the Results and Discussion sections, and how to proofread the manuscript.
Very specific directions need to be given on what should be included in the Results
and Discussion sections. In the Results section, we emphasize a certain order to the
information. The students begin by presenting the descriptive statistics, including
an introduction to Table 1. Then for each statistical analysis, the presentation in-
cludes which statistic was computed, what was compared or correlated, and finally
a properly worded statistical finding statement. For the Discussion section, we em-
phasize a reiteration of the focus for the study, past tense summary of the findings,
connection between the findings of the student and the findings in the research liter-
ature, present tense conclusion statements, and suggestions for future research.
In this final phase, we usually require that the students submit the SPSS (1998)
output printouts for the statistical analyses. The printouts must be labeled so that it
is clear that students understand whether or not significance was obtained and
where certain pertinent pieces of information exist on the printout. We also require
our students to complete these same analyses by hand to promote an understanding
of the statistical processes involved.
With these hand computations, we require a graph of the computed correlation
coefficient or t ratio compared to a table value, so that the statistical decision is
clear. Then, we require a properly worded, past tense, statistical finding (included
eventually in the Results section), as well as a properly worded, present tense, con-
clusion statement (included in the Discussion section). The laboratory instructor
reviews the work of each student and compares the hand calculations with the
computer printouts. Feedback again can be offered to the student prior to the final
draft. Finally, the student needs to combine all the pieces of the research assign-
ment, proofread the manuscript, and submit the manuscript and statistical analyses
for grading by the main instructor.
In summary, this step-by-step process has been a valuable tool. Students are
provided with an organizational method that allows them to progressively create a
manuscript that, to many students, is a new experience. The process helps to en-