UPDATES
heteroaromatic substrate 1n was also suitable for the
protocol, albeit with a moderate yield of 47%
(Table 2).
Table 2. Substrate scope for 2-(1-(acetyloxy)propargyl)
benzaldehydes 1.[a,b]
Subsequently, we evaluated the generality of the
approach in regard to o-phenylenediamines 2 (Table 3).
The reaction was carried out under slightly modified
conditions that the ratio of 1a:2 was changed to 1:2.
The substrates bearing either electron-withdrawing (F,
Cl) or electron-donating (Me) substituents on the
phenyl ring of o-phenylenediamines 2 could furnish
the corresponding products (3ab-3ah) in moderate to
good yields. Difluro-substituted substrate 2b delivered
3ab in 64% yield. Dichloro- and dibromo-substituted
substrates (2c and 2d) could also proceed well, leading
to similar isolated yields. The substrate 2e bearing Me-
substituents at both 4- and 5-positions of phenyl ring
displayed the decreased reactivity, providing the
corresponding product 3ae in 41% yield. Naphthyl-
substituted substrate 2f furnished the isoindolo[2,1-a]
quinoxaline 3af in 55% yield. Monosubstituted sub-
strates provided two isomers of isoindolo[2,1-a]
quinoxalines. Thus, Me-substituted substrate 2g deliv-
ered an inseparable mixture of isoindolo[2,1-a]
quinoxalines 3ag and 3 ag’ in a total yield of 80%
[a] Method A: 1 (0.24 mmol), 2a (0.2 mmol), Cu(OAc)2 ·H2O
(0.01 mmol, 5 mol%), L7 (0.011 mmol, 5.5 mol%), iPr2NEt
°
(0.1 mmol, 0.5 equiv.), 8 mL of MeOH, 60 C, 12 h.
[b] Yield of isolated products.
[c] The reaction was performed at room temperature.
toluene, the desired product was furnished in low yield with a ratio of 2:1 (Table 3). When 4-chloro-o-phenyl-
(Table 1, entries 16–17). Further investigation of the enediamine 2h was employed, two isomers were
°
reaction temperature revealed that 60 C was optimal, obtained in isolated yields of 36% (major) and 15%
at which the reaction displayed higher reactivity to (minor), respectively (Table 3). As for alkyl-diamine
give 3aa in 80% yield (Table 1, entry 18). Prolonging 2i, no desired product 3ai was obtained under standard
reaction time didn’t improve the yield (Table 1, conditions (Method B, Scheme 3). We also evaluated
entry 19).
other analogues, such as 2-aminophenol 6, which
With the optimized conditions in hand, we inves- proved to be not suitable for the process (Method B,
tigated the substrate scope of 2-(1-(acetyloxy) Scheme 3).
propargyl)benzaldehydes 1 (Table 2). The current
methodology exhibits good functional group compati-
bility, which offers a diverse synthesis of isoindolo
Table 3. Substrate scope for o-phenylenediamine 2.[a,b]
[2,1-a]quinoxalines containing substituents on isoin-
dole core. The substrates bearing electron-withdrawing
(F, Cl, CF3) and electron-donating (Me, OMe) sub-
stituents proceeded smoothly with o-phenylenediamine
2a, affording the corresponding products 3ba-3na in
42–88% yields (Table 2). These results revealed that
the reaction was sensitive to the electronic effect of
substituents on the phenyl ring of 2-(1-(acetyloxy)
propargyl)benzaldehydes 1. The electron-withdrawing
substituents (F, Cl, or CF3) were beneficial to the
reaction in comparison with the electron-donating
substituents (Me or OMe) (Table 2). The substrates
with a substituent at the 4-position of phenyl ring was
commonly superior to those with the same substituent
at the 5-position (3ba-3ka, Table 2). Under standard
conditions, dimethoxy-substituted substrate 1l resulted
[a] Method B: 1a (0.2 mmol), 2 (0.4 mmol), Cu(OAc)2 ·H2O
(0.01 mmol, 5 mol%), L7 (0.011 mmol, 5.5 mol%), iPr2NEt
in the product in 45% yield. By performing the
reaction at room temperature, the yield of 3la could be
promoted to 62% (Table 2). Naphthyl-substituted sub-
strate 1m underwent the reaction well and furnished
the desired product 3ma in 65% yield. Moreover,
°
(0.1 mmol, 0.5 equiv.), 8 mL of MeOH, 60 C, 12 h.
[b] Yield of isolated products.
[c] Not separable.
Adv. Synth. Catal. 2021, 363, 1–6
3
© 2021 Wiley-VCH GmbH
��
These are not the final page numbers!