Table 2 Extraction of metal picrates by L1
Picrate
Extractiona (%)
Na
K
Cs
80
40
15
a Aqueous phase: 1 3 1024 M metal picrate; CDCl3 phase: 1 3 1023 M L1
at 298 K.
1H NMR anion titration experiments with L1 were repeated in
the presence of 1 equiv. of sodium picrate and EQNMR
determined stability constant values are present in Table 3.
Clearly there is a significant increase in the strength of binding
for all anions in the presence of 1 equiv. of sodium cation; in the
Fig. 1 Distribution coefficients for pertechnetate extraction by L1–L3 and
benzo-15-crown-5. Organic phase: CH2Cl2, concentration of L1–L3 = 1.5
3 1022 M, benzo-15-crown-5 = 4.5 3 1022 M; aqueous phase: 100 ppm
NH4TcO4, 2.35 M NaNO3, pH 11, T = 298 K.
2
case of ReO4 the increase is greater than twenty-fold. This
positive cooperativity may be attributed to the increased
electrostatic attraction between the positively charged L1·Na+
complex and the guest anion. The complexed metal cation may
also affect the spatial arrangement of the ligand and enhance the
relative acidity of the ligand’s amide protons, leading to
stronger hydrogen bonding of the anionic guest. It is noteworthy
that the anion selectivity trend displayed by L1 is altered in the
presence of sodium. With no metal cation present, L1 binds Cl2
in preference to ReO42, however on addition of sodium cation,
noted in the NMR titration experiments. Preliminary U-tube
membrane transport investigations using the same aqueous
conditions as described previously for the extraction experi-
ments as the source of the aqueous phase revealed a six-fold
increase in the rate of transport of TcO42 by L1 (flux = 6.3 3
1028 mol h21) over transport mediated by benzo-15-crown-5
(flux = 1.0 3 1028 mol h21).
In summary, the new tripodal heteroditopic ligand L1, by
virtue of having both anion and cation recognition sites, has
been demonstrated to cooperatively bind chloride, iodide and
perrhentate anions via co-bound crown ether complexed sodium
cations, and is a more efficient extraction and carrier transport-
ing reagent for the pertechnetate anion when compared to
monotopic ligands L2, L3 and benzo-15-crown-5.
2
ReO4 is more strongly bound (Table 3), which suggests the
binding of the metal cation preorganises L1 for tetrahedral
anionic guest recognition.
Table 3 Stability constants for L1 anion binding in the presence and absence
of sodium picrate in CDCl3
Anion
K/M21
We thank BNFL for a studentship (P. K. H.) and the EPSRC
for use of the mass spectrometry service at University College,
Swansea.
Cl2
60a
520c
30a
Cl2 (+Na+)b
I2
I2 (+Na+)b
ReO4
ReO42 (+Na+)b
390c
40a
Notes and references
2
†
1H NMR titration studies with L1 and Na+ unfortunately proved too
840c
complicated to monitor, to enable binding stoichiometries to be deter-
mined.
a
b
At 298 K, errors estimated to be @10%. Titration carried out in the
c
‡ In analogous extraction experiments at neutral pH, L1 extracted 65%
presence of 1 equiv. of sodium picrate. At 298 K, errors estimated to be
@15%.
2
TcO4
.
1 M. T. Reetz, C. M. Niemeyer and K. Harris, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
Engl., 1991, 30, 1472.
2 D. M. Rudkevich, Z. Brzozka, M. Palys, H. C. Visser, W. Verboom and
D. N. Reinhoudt, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1994, 33, 467.
3 K. I. Kinnear, D. P. Mousley, E. Arafar and J. C. Lockhart, J. Chem.
Soc., Dalton Trans., 1994, 3637.
Encouraged by these cooperative ion pair binding results,
pertechnetate extraction experiments were carried out using
conditions that simulated nuclear waste streams. The aqueous
phase contained ammonium pertechnetate (100 ppm) and
sodium nitrate (2.35 M) and the pH was adjusted to basic
conditions (pH = 11) using NaOH. The organic phase consisted
of CH2Cl2 solutions of L1–L3 and benzo-15-crown-5 at
concentrations of 1.5 3 1022 M for the tripodal ligands and 4.5
3 1022 M for the crown ether. Equal volumes (2 ml) of each
solution were mixed, and rapidly shaken. Inductively coupled
plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) and 99Tc NMR were used
to determine the concentrations of pertechnetate in the re-
4 P. D. Beer, M. G. B. Drew, R. J. Knubley and M. I. Ogden, J. Chem.
Soc., Dalton Trans., 1995, 3117.
5 J. Scheerder, J. P. M. van Duynhoven, J. F. J. Engbersen and D. N.
Reinhoudt, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1996, 35, 1090.
6 J. E. Redman, P. D. Beer, S. W. Dent and M. G. B. Drew, Chem.
Commun., 1998, 231; P. D. Beer and S. W. Dent, Chem. Commun.,
1998, 825.
7 T. M. Beasley and H. V. Lorz, Technetium in the Environment, ed. G.
Desmet and C. Myttenacrc, Elsevier, London, 1986.
8 M. G. Jalhoom, J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem., 1986, 104, 131.
9 T. Omori, Y. Muraoka and H. Suganuma, J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem.,
1994, 178, 237.
10 J. F. Clark, D. L. Clark, G. D. Whitener, N. C. Schroeder and S. H.
Strauss, Environ. Sci. Technol., 1996, 30, 3124.
11 J. L. Atwood, K. T. Holman and J. W. Steed, Chem. Commun., 1996,
1401.
12 R. Ungaro, B. El Hay and J. Smid, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1976, 98,
5198.
13 M. J. Hynes, J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans., 1993, 311.
14 K. H. Wong, M. Bourgoin and J. Smid, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun.,
1974, 715.
2
spective phases. L1 extracted ca. 70% TcO4 whereas benzo-
15-crown-5 achieved ca. 20% extraction after 5 min.‡ No
increase in percentage extraction occurred after this time.
Interestingly the tripodal ligands L2 and L3 containing no crown
moieties displayed respectively less than 10 and 0% extraction
2
of TcO4 even after 24 h. The distribution coefficients for
2
TcO4 extraction by all the ligands are shown in Fig. 1. The
distribution coefficient D for L1 of 2.3 represents a greater than
twenty-fold and ten-fold enhancement in extraction efficiency
when compared to L2 and benzo-15-crown-5, respectively. This
important result suggests that a crown ether cation binding site
covalently linked to a tripodal amide anion coordinating cavity
2
creates a new efficient extraction reagent for TcO4 which
operates via similar cooperative ion-pair binding effects as
Communication 9/03440D
1254
Chem. Commun., 1999, 1253–1254