C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
respectively, and the [SO2]/diethylamine ratio is 1. Morpholine is
less basic than other tested amines (pKa ) 8.3 compared to pKa g
11 for others) and, as a consequence, binds to SO2 weaker than to
the porphyrin. Accordingly, 30 equiv of SO2 is required to displace
50% of porphyrin 1. Considering that 102-103-fold excess of
amines versus 1 is necessary in the displacement assays, these
calculations set the SO2 detection limit at a low millimolar range
and also can be used in the design of more sensitive systems.12
In conclusion, it is now possible to detect SO2 utilizing its
noncovalent chemistry with amines. The indicator-displacement
approach once again proved to be useful. While there are obvious
UV changes simply upon addition of SO2 to an amine, incorporating
the porphyrin in the assay brings the response into the visible region
of the spectrum. The proposed system discriminates between SO2
and such exhaust gases as COX, NOX, and moisture. For this
preliminary report, commercially available amines and a porphyrin
were used; however, synthetic modification of both is possible to
achieve more colorful responses. It would also be possible to modify
the system for SO2 detection in aqueous solutions and at the gas-
solid interface.13 We are working toward these goals and further
testing the system selectivity with respect to other gases and
volatiles.
Figure 3. Titrations of SO2 (λmax ∼ 288 nm) with piperidine (A) and
pyrrolidine (B) in CHCl3 at 23 ( 1 °C ([SO2] ) 4 × 10-3 M, [amine] )
4 × 10-4 - 7 × 10-3 M).
Acknowledgment. Financial support is acknowledged from the
NSF (CHE-0350958) and the A. P. Sloan Foundation.
Supporting Information Available: Experimental procedures and
spectra. This material is available free of charge via Internet at http://
pubs.acs.org.
References
Figure 4. Absorbance spectra of complex 1•quinuclidine (A) and 1•pyr-
rolidine (B) upon addition of SO2 in CHCl3 at 23 ( 1 °C. Determination
of the SO2•amine association constants was performed by a competitive
binding algorithm; see refs 10 and 11.
(2) Selected examples: (a) Mohr, G. J. Chem. Commun. 2002, 2646-2647.
(b) Stangelmayer, A.; Klimant, I.; Wolfbeis, O. S. Fresenius J. Anal. Chem.
1998, 362, 73-76. (c) Mohr, G. J.; Werner, T.; Oehme, I.; Preininger,
C.; Klimant, I.; Kovacs, B.; Wolfbeis, O. S. AdV. Mater. 1997, 9, 1108-
1113. (d) Raman, V.; Rai, J.; Singh, M.; Parashar, D. C. Analyst 1986,
111, 189-191. (e) Suzuki, Y.; Imai, S. Anal. Chem. 1986, 58, 3271-
3273. (f) Irgum, K. Anal. Chem. 1985, 57, 1335-1338. (g) Lambert, J.
L.; Chejlava, M. J.; Beyad, M. H.; Paukstelis, J. V. Talanta 1982, 29,
37-40. Reversible chemistry between SO2 and organometallic com-
pounds: (h) Albrecht, M.; Gossage, R. A.; Lutz, M.; Spek, A. L.; van
Koten, G. Chem.sEur. J. 2000, 6, 1431-1445.
concentrated solutions, clear color changes were observed from
purple-red to dark green. From the UV-vis experiments, the Kassoc
values ranging from 7.0 × 102 (diethylamine) to 7.0 × 104 M-1
(quinuclidine) were obtained, which are in agreement with the
literature (Table 1).9
In the indicator-displacement assay,10 ∼102-103-fold excess of
amines versus 1 was used to ensure the quantitative formation of
1•amine complexes at UV-vis concentrations (2 × 10-6 M).
Solution of SO2 in CHCl3 was added stepwise to the solutions of
1 and the corresponding amine in CHCl3, and the Soret absorbance
was monitored. Hypsochromic shifts of the Soret band were
observed, indicating the liberation of 1 and thus the formation of
SO2•amine adducts (Figure 4). The isosbestic points imply that clean
transformation from the 1•amine complexes to free porphyrin 1
takes place.
Using the algorithm developed by Anslyn and co-workers,10,11
the Kassoc constants for SO2•amine complexes were determined from
the indicator-displacement titrations (Table 1). These are compa-
rable to those obtained by direct titration experiments between SO2
and the amines. For example, the Kassoc values for pyrrolidine and
piperidine, obtained by direct titration, are 1.3 × 104 and 3.3 ×
104 M-1, respectively.
(3) Rudkevich, D. M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 558-571 (review).
(4) Kang, Y.; Zyryanov, G. V.; Rudkevich, D. M. Chem. Commun. 2003,
2470-2471.
(5) Florjanczyk, Z.; Raducha, D. Pol. J. Chem. 1995, 69, 459-481 (review).
(6) (a) Maier, N.; Schiewe, J.; Matschiner, H.; Maschmeier, C.-P.; Boese, R.
Phosphorous, Sulfur Silicon 1994, 91, 179-188. (b) Childs, J. D.; van
der Helm, D.; Christian, S. D. Inorg. Chem. 1975, 14, 1386-1390. (c)
van der Helm, D.; Childs, J. D.; Christian, S. D. Chem. Commun. 1969,
887-888.
(7) (a) Wong, M. W.; Wiberg, K. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 7527-
7535. (b) Douglas, J. E.; Kollman, P. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1978, 100,
5226-5227. (c) Lucchese, R. R.; Haber, K.; Schaefer, H. F., III. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1976, 98, 7617-7620.
(8) (a) Grundnes, J.; Christian, S. D. Acta Chem. Scand. 1969, 23, 3583-
3584. (b) Grundnes, J.; Christian, S. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1968, 90, 2239-
2245. (c) Moede, J. A.; Curran, C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1949, 71, 852-
858. (d) de Faria, D. L. A.; Santos, P. S. Magn. Reson. Chem. 1987, 25,
592-593.
(9) Recent review: Satake, A.; Kobuke, Y. Tetrahedron 2005, 61, 13-41.
(10) (a) Zhu, L.; Zhong, Z.; Anslyn, E. V. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 4260-
4269 and references therein. (b) Wiskur, S. L.; Lavigne, J. J.; Metzger,
A.; Tobey, S. L.; Lynch, V.; Anslyn, E. V. Chem.sEur. J. 2004, 10,
3792-3804. (c) Wiskur, S. L.; Ait-Haddou, H.; Lavigne, J. J.; Anslyn,
E. V. Acc. Chem. Res. 2001, 34, 963-972.
(11) Conners, K. A. Binding Constants. The Measurement of Molecular
Complex Stability; John Wiley and Sons: New York, 1987.
(12) For thermodynamic analysis of competition assays, see: Fabbrizzi, L.;
Marcotte, N.; Stomeo, F.; Taglietti, A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41,
3811-3814.
(13) For visual detection of SO2 at the air-solid interface, a test strip was
prepared by depositing red solution of 1 in CHCl3 on a filter paper and
drying it in air. Addition of pyrrolidine in CHCl3 changed the color of
the strip to green. After drying, this test strip was exposed to SO2, and its
color returned to the original red. See Supporting Information.
To estimate the sensitivity, the [SO2]/amine ratios were deter-
mined in the displacement experiments, at which the concentrations
of 1•amine complexes and free 1 are roughly equal (Table 1). When
binding constants between amines and porphyrin 1 are smaller than
or comparable to those between amines and SO2, the [SO2]/amine
ratios are small. For example, the Kassoc values for 1•diethylamine
and SO2•diethylamine are 7.0 × 102 and 2.2 × 104 M-1
,
JA053260V
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 127, NO. 41, 2005 14127