Scheme 2a
a (a) PhCH2Br, NaOH, Et3N, hexane, reflux, 5h, 98%; (b) MCPBA, CH2Cl2, rt, 24 h, 91%; (c) LiCtCH‚EDA, DMSO, rt, 40 min, 91%;
(d) CH2(OMe)2, P2O5, CHCl3, rt, 79%; (e) AcCl, Ac2O, Py, CH2Cl2, rt, 91%; (f) 12, THF, 60 °C, 15 h, 74%; (g) MeI, K2CO3, acetone,
reflux, 3 h, 81%; (h) K2CO3, MeOH, H2O, rt, 6 h, 85%; (i) CH2(OMe)2, BF3‚Et2O, Et2O, rt, 85%; (j) H2, Pd/C (10%), EtOH, rt, 2 days,
77%; (k) CrO3, acetone, CH3CO2H, H2O, rt, 40 min; (l) MeOH, H2SO4, rt, 12 h, 43% for last two steps; (m) BBr3, CH2Cl2, -78 to 0 °C,
85%; (n) KOH, MeOH, rt, 3 h, 97%.9
delighted to find that the benzannulation reaction of 12 with
the acetylene ester 18 proceeded smoothly, affording naph-
thol 20 in 74% isolated yield. It should be noted that the
benzannulation reaction with this terminal acetylene is highly
regioselective to give only 2-substituted naphthol, consistent
with what had been reported in the literature.14 Methylation
of the phenol using iodomethane and K2CO3 gave 81% of
1,4,5-trimethoxynaphthalene 21,24 which was converted to
alcohol derivative 22 in an 85% yield upon hydrolysis of
the acetyl group (K2CO3, MeOH, H2O). The oxa-Pictet-
Spengler cyclization of 22 with dimethoxymethane was
carried out in Et2O using BF3 etherate to give an 86% yield
of the functionalized naphthopyran 10.25
(6) Foland, L. D.; Decker, O. H. W.; Moore, H. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1989, 111, 989.
(7) Kraus, G. A.; Molina, M. T.; Walling, J. A. J. Org. Chem. 1987, 52,
1273.
(8) Uno, H. J. Org. Chem. 1986, 51, 350.
(9) Semmelhack, M. F.; Keller, L.; Sato, T.; Spiess, E. J.; Wulff, W. D.
J. Org. Chem. 1985, 50, 5566. Semmelhack, M. F.; Zask, A. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1983, 105, 2034.
(10) Ichihara, A.; Ubukata, M.; Oikawa, H.; Murakami, K.; Sakamura,
S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1980, 21, 4469.
(11) Kraus, G. A.; Li, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 5859.
(12) Xu, Y. C.; Roy, C.; Lebeau, E. Tetrahedron Lett. 1993, 51, 8189.
(13) Wuensch, B.; Zott, M.; Hoefner, G.; Bauschke, G. Arch. Pharm.
1995, 328 (6), 487.
(14) Wulff, W. D.; Tang, P. C.; McCallum, J. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1981, 103, 7677.
(15) Do¨tz, K. H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1975, 14, 644.
(16) Fafadia, N. J.; Wakankar, D. M.; Nambudiry, M. E. N. Chem. Ind.
1988, 6, 203.
(17) Romeo, S.; Rich, D. H. Tetrahedron Lett. 1993, 34(45), 7187.
(18) Takano, S.; Sekiguchi, Y.; Sato, N.; Ogasawara, K. Synthesis 1987,
139.
(19) Wulff, W. D.; Tang, P. C.; Chan, K. S.; McCallum, J. S.; Yang, D.
C.; Gilbertson, S. R. Tetrahedron 1985, 41, 5813.
(20) Wulff, W. D.; Xu, Y. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 2312.
(21) Wulff, W. D. In ComprehensiVe Organometallic Chemistry II; Abel,
E. W., Stone, F. G. A., Wilkinson, G., Eds.; Pergamon Press: 1995; Vol.
12.
(22) The effect of propargyl oxygen substituents in the benzannulation
has been studied: Semmelhack, M. F.; Jeong, N.; Lee, G. R. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1990, 31, 609.
(23) Mohler, D. L.; Thompson, D. W. Tetrahedron Lett. 1987, 28, 2567.
(24) Koo, S.; Liebeskind, L. S.; J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 3389.
Org. Lett., Vol. 1, No. 10, 1999
1601