1946
M. A. Leeuwenburgh et al.
LETTER
The transformation of 7 into the target compound 3
(Scheme 3) starts with the allylation of HO-2 in 7. Subse-
quent RCM of the resulting trans-allyl-O-allyl setting in 8
using Grubbs’ catalyst (PCy3)2Cl2Ru=CHPh11 provided
the trans-fused 7,6-bicyclic system 2b in near quantitative
yield. Introduction of the second and similarly fused ring
could be realised by executing the following simple and
straightforward six-step procedure. Desilylation of 2b fol-
lowed by allylation of the secondary hydroxyl group gave,
after detritylation of 9, the primary alcoholic derivative
2c. Dess-Martin periodinane oxidation12 of 2c and subse-
quent Wittig olefination with methyltriphenylphosphoni-
um bromide in the presence of n-butyllithium led to the
isolation of RCM precursor 10. RCM of the latter deriva-
tive using the same ruthenium catalyst also proceeded
smoothly at room temperature to give the trans-fused tri-
cyclic ether 3,8 as evidenced by NOE-experiments, in
43% yield based on 7.
Reagents and conditions: i. TBAF, THF, 94%. ii. allyl bromide, NaH,
DMF, 87%. iii. TsOH, MeOH/CH2Cl2 (1:1), 92%. iv. a) Dess-Martin
periodinane, CH2Cl2; b) MePh3P+Br–, n-BuLi, THF, –40 °C to r.t.,
78% (two steps). v. Cl2(PCy3)2R=CHPh (5 mol%), 0.02 M diene
conc., CH2Cl2, 3h, 78%.
Scheme 4
The results presented in this paper clearly indicate that the
differentially protected glucal 1b is a valuable and versa-
tile building unit in the design and synthesis of trans-
fused cyclic ethers. Moreover, the protecting group strat-
egy described here can be easily adapted for the prepara-
tion of other appropriately protected glucal derivatives,
e.g., compound 1d in which the benzyl group is replaced
by a 4-methoxybenzyl (MPM) group. In this respect, it is
of interest to mention that glucal 1b may be an attractive
alternative for the preparation of the recently reported2g
intermediate 2 (n = 1, R1 = H, R2 = MPM, R3 = Bn). The
implementation of our strategy in the assembly of more
extended cyclic ether frameworks of ciguatoxin 3C and
other structurally related marine toxins will be reported in
due course.
Acknowledgement
The authors thank Fons Lefeber for recording the COSY and
NOESY spectra and Hans van den Elst for performing the mass
spectrometry.
Reagents and conditions: i. allyl bromide, NaH, DMF, 97%. ii.
Cl2(PCy3)2R=CHPh (5 mol%), 0.02 M diene conc., CH 2Cl2, 2h, 99%.
iii. TBAF, THF, 84%. iv. allyl bromide, NaH, DMF, 88%. v. TsOH,
References and Notes
MeOH/CH2Cl2 (1:1), 94%. vi. a) Dess-Martin periodinane, CH Cl2;
(1) a) Ovaa, H.; Leeuwenburgh, M.A.; Overkleeft, H.S.; Van der
Marel, G.A.; Van Boom, J.H. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39,
3025. b) Van Hooft, P.A.V.; Leeuwenburgh, M.A.;
2
b) MePh3P+Br–, n-BuLi, THF, –40 °C to r.t., 80%. vii.
Cl2(PCy3)2R=CHPh (5 mol%), 0.02 M diene conc., CH 2Cl2, 3h, 82%.
Overkleeft, H.S.; Van der Marel, G.A.; Van Boeckel, C.A.A.;
Van Boom, J.H. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 6061. c) Ovaa,
H.; Codée, J.D.C.; Lastdrager, B.; Overkleeft, H.S.; Van der
Marel, G.A.; Van Boom, J.H. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39,
7987. d) Ovaa, H.; Codée, J.D.C.; Lastdrager, B.; Overkleeft,
H.S.; Van der Marel, G.A.; Van Boom, J.H. Tetrahedron Lett.
1999, 40, 5063. e) Leeuwenburgh, M.A.; Overkleeft, H.S.;
Van der Marel, G.A.; Van Boom, J.H. Synlett 1997, 1263. f)
Leeuwenburgh, M.A.; Kulker, C.; Duynstee, H.I.; Overkleeft,
H.S.; Van der Marel, G.A.; Van Boom, J.H. Tetrahedron
1999, 55, 8253.
Scheme 3
The relatively high efficacy of both metathesis steps (i.e.
8Æ2b and 10Æ3) urged us to explore whether the forma-
tion of 3 could be achieved in one step using the bis-O-al-
lyl derivative 14 (Scheme 4) as the substrate. The bis-O-
allyl ether functions could be easily installed (Scheme 4)
by desilylation of 7 (Æ11), allylation of both secondary
hydroxyl groups (11Æ12), detritylation of 12 and conver-
sion of 13 by the same sequence of events mentioned ear-
lier for the transformation of 2c into 10. Ruthenium
catalysed RCM of 14 was uneventful to give 3 in a similar
overall yield.
(2) a) Dirat, O.; Vidal, T.; Langlois, Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999,
40, 4801. b) Rainier, J.D.; Allwein, S.P. J. Org. Chem. 1998,
63, 5310. c) Ghosh, A.K.; Cappiello, J.; Shin, D. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1998, 39, 4651. d) Fürstner, A.; Müller, T. J. Org. Chem.
1998, 63, 424. e) Holt, D.J.; Barker, W.D.; Jenkins, P.R.;
Davies, D.L.; Garratt, S.; Fawcett, J.; Russell, D.R.; Ghosh, S.
Synlett 1999, No. 12, 1945–1947 ISSN 0936-5214 © Thieme Stuttgart · New York