5076
S. Goswami et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 54 (2013) 5075–5077
O2N
0.35
0.30
0.25
0.20
0.15
0.10
0.05
0.00
N
340nm
N
H
N
N
O
N
N
442nm
O
NH
NH
, MeOH
Ni
O
NiCl2.6H2O
r.t, 12 h
N
4
N
N
N
NO2
5
NO2
370nm
Scheme 2. Probable host-guest binding mode in solution phase.
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600
wavelength(nm)
Figure 1. UV–vis absorption spectra of HQNM (1 Â 10À5 M) in CH3CN–HEPES buffer
(9:1, v/v, pH 7.4) upon titration with nickel chloride (NiCl2Á6H2O, 0.8 equiv). The
arrows show changes due to the increasing concentration of Ni2+. Inset, binding
isotherms were recorded at 250 and 600 nm with Ni2+. The solid line is global least-
squares fit to the experimental data.
formation of a new complex between the receptor (HQNM) and the
nickel cation (Fig. 1) which is also responsible for the generation of
yellow color after the addition of nickel chloride into the solution
of the receptor. Figure 1 actually indicates the change of absor-
bance with the concentration of nickel. Furthermore the sensing
ability of HQNM with nickel at different pH was investigated. At
lower pH range, the sensor HQNM has no response to nickel in
absorption spectroscopy due to protonation and at pH 7.4 the sen-
sibility of the receptor HQNM toward nickel is maximum and at
higher pH the absorbance diminishes (Supplementary data) which
may be due to the fact that the receptor HQNM is unstable at high-
er pH. This indicates that the probe may be suitable for bio-appli-
cations at the physiological pH. The free probe is highly stable
under the assay conditions. Since HQNM has an acidic hydrogen
moiety, it would act as a weak acid in acetonitrile solution. The
pKa of HQNM was determined by pH-dependent UV–vis spectral
changes. Supplementary Fig. S2 shows plots of absorbance at
340 nm as a function of pH. This sigmoidal plot allowed us to
determine the pKa value of HQNM to be 5.14.
Figure 2. (A À A0)/A0 ratios of receptor HQNM (1 Â 10À5 M) after the addition of
0.8 equiv of each of the various cations (2 Â 10À4 M) in acetonitrile. Inset: color
changes of receptor HQNM (1 Â 10À5 M) upon the addition of 0.8 equiv of each of
the different guest cations (2 Â 10À4 M).
significant influence. The color changes are most probably due to
the formation of hydrogen bonds or deprotonation of the –NH
group of receptor HQNM on the addition of nickel ion which is
shown in Scheme 2. To further explore the binding mechanism,
Job’s plot of the UV–vis titrations of Ni2+ ion with a total volume
of 2 ml was revealed. A maximum absorption was observed when
the molar fraction reached 0.67, which is indicative of a 2:1 stoichi-
ometric complexation between HQNM and Ni2+ ion for the newly
formed species. The ESI mass spectrum of a mixture of HQNM
and NiCl2.6H2O also revealed the formation of a 2:1 ligand–metal
complex through the metal coordination interaction, with a major
signal at m/z = 700.0.[possibly for (2 M+Ni)+ ions]. From the IR data
the phenomenon is also well explained by the decreasing broad-
ness of the –NH peak at 3372 cmÀ1 due to the insertion of nickel
metal in HQNM (Supplementary data).
From the UV–visible titration data it is revealed that minimum
1.47 lM of nickel can be detected by using 10 lM of receptor
HQNM using the equation DL = K Â Sb1/S, where K = 3, Sb1 is the
standard deviation of the blank solution and S is the slope of the
calibration curve14b(Supplementary data).
These hydrogen bonds or de-protonations affect the electronic
properties of the chromophore which results in a change of color
from colorless to yellow along with a new charge-transfer interac-
tion between the nickel bound –NH moieties and the electron defi-
cient nitro group.15,16 Furthermore, the strong hydrogen-bonding
After addition of 0.8 equiv of nickel chloride, it reaches a satura-
tion level. Titrations were also carried out with various cations like
Na+, K+, Cr2+, Mn2+, Cd2+, Fe2+, Fe3+, Co2+, Cu2+, Zn2+ etc as their tetra
butyl ammonium salts. Interestingly there is no obvious change
observed in the UV spectrum except with cobalt ion, which shows
slight interference (Supplementary data). There is appearance of a
small new peak at 448 nm which indicates that the receptor
(HQNM) has a slight response to cobalt ion due to the same size
of ionic radius of the two cations. The cavity of HQNM binds selec-
tively to nickel over cobalt possibly because of the size of the nickel
cation which better fits in the core of the cavity as created by the
quinoxaline moiety and the hydrazone part (Scheme 2) forming a
stable six-membered ring.
Figure 2 actually shows the selectivity for nickel over the other
cations as shown by the sky blue bar. The slight interference of co-
balt is shown by the yellow bar but it cannot be detected by naked
eye which is shown in the inset. From the experimental data, it can
be concluded that the receptor HQNM possesses high selectivity
and sensitivity toward nickel in acetonitrile-HEPES buffer (9:1, v/
v, pH 7.4) medium. The other cations except cobalt had no practical
interaction between receptor HQNM and nickel could enhance
p
0.020
0.015
0.010
0.005
0.000
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
Xh
Figure 3. Job’s plot diagram of receptor HQNM for Ni2+ (where Xh is the mole
fraction of host and I indicates the change of the absorbance).
D