4192 J . Org. Chem., Vol. 65, No. 13, 2000
Notes
The reaction mixture was allowed to warm to room temperature,
and the stirring was continued for 30 min. The mixture was
diluted with saturated aqueous NH4Cl solution and extracted
with hexane. The combined organic phases were washed with
brine, dried, and concentrated. The residue was purified by
chromatography, using 95:5 hexanes-ether as eluent, to afford
the alcohol 5 (463 mg, 80%): mp 35-36 °C (from cold pentane);
enylation of ketone 13 (136 mg, 0.50 mmol) (prepared as
described in the Supporting Information) by treatment with
vinylmagnesium bromide (1 mL of a 1 M solution in THF, 1
mmol) in THF (4 mL) in the same way described for 4 afforded,
after chromatographic purification using 9:1 hexanes-ether as
eluent, the alcohol 14 (124 mg, 89%) as a white solid: mp 106.5-
107 °C (from MeOH); [R]25D +38.4 (c 1.3, CHCl3); IR (KBr) 3635,
1454, 1363, 996, 936 cm-1; 1H NMR (299.95 MHz, CDCl3) δ 5.83
(1H, dd, J 16.7, 11.5), 5.16 (1H, dd, J 16.7, 1.7), 5.15 (1H, dd, J
11.5, 1.7), 1.9 (2H, m), 1.01 (3H, s), 0.94 (3 H, s), 0.79 (3H, s),
0.70 (3H, d J 6.6), 0.5 (1H, m), 0.4 (1H, dd, J 9.0, 3.6), -0.09
(1H, dd, J 6.0, 3.6); HRMS calcd for C21H34O 302.2609, found
302.2604.
[R]22 -14.3 (c 10.2, CHCl3); IR (KBr) 3600 cm-1 1H NMR
;
D
(199.95 MHz, CDCl3) δ 5.82 (1H, dd, J 17.2, 10.8), 5.13 (1H, dd,
J 10.8, 1.6), 5.04 (1H, dd, J 17.2, 1.6), 0.95 (3H, s), 0.86 (3H, s),
0.81 (3H, s), 0.70 (3H, d, J 6.7); HRMS calcd for C16H28
O
236.2140, found 236.2147. This was followed by the (1S)-epimer
of 5 (28 mg, 5%): [R]22D -10.7 (c 9.9, CHCl3); IR (film) 3511 cm-1
1H NMR (299.95 MHz, CDCl3) δ 6.20 (1H, dd, J 16.8, 11.5), 5.24
(1H, dd, J 11.5, 1.9), 5.23 (1H, dd, J 16.8, 1.9), 1.05 (3H, s), 0.84
;
(1S,10S,13S,2R,7R,11R)-1,5,7,11-Tetr am eth yl-6-vin yltetr a-
cyclo[8.5.0.02,7.011,13]p en ta d ec-5-en e (15). This compound was
prepared by treatment of 14 (124 mg, 0.42 mmol) with pyridine
(1.6 mL) and thionyl chloride (40 µL, 0.42 mmol), as described
above for the synthesis of 6. Extraction with hexane and workup
of the extract afforded a residue, which was purified by chro-
matography, using 9:1 hexanes-ether as eluent, to give diene
(3H, s), 0.83 (3H, s), 0.70 (3H, d, J 6.6); HRMS calcd for C16H28
236.2140, found 236.2135.
O
(4aS,8aS)-3,4,4a,5,6,7,8,8a-Octah ydr o-2,5,5,8a-tetr am eth yl-
1-vin yln a p h th a len e (6). To a solution of the alcohol 5 (450 mg,
1.9 mmol) in anhydrous pyridine (4 mL) was added dropwise
thionyl chloride (0.18 mL, 2.09 mmol) at -30 °C. The reaction
mixture was allowed to warm to -10 °C during 1 h and then
diluted with hexane. The organic layer was washed with diluted
hydrochloric acid, aqueous NaHCO3, and brine. Drying and
evaporation of the solvent gave an oily residue. This was purified
by chromatography, using 95:5 hexanes-ether as eluent, to give
the diene 6 (374 mg, 90%) as a relatively volatile colorless oil:
[R]22D +85 (c 6, CHCl3); IR (film) 3091, 1621, 915 cm-1; 1H NMR
(200.13 MHz, CDCl3) δ 6.10 (1H, dd, J 17.5, 11.1), 5.21 (1H, dd,
J 11.1, 2.9), 4.87 (1H, dd, J 17.5, 2.9), 1.62 (3H, s), 0.97 (3H, s),
0.87 (3H, s), 0.82 (3H, s); HRMS calcd for C16H26 218.2034, found
218.2033.
15 (96 mg, 82%) as a colorless oil: [R]25 -10.6 (c 1.7, CHCl3);
D
IR (KBr) 3073, 3047, 1619, 915, 846 cm-1; 1H NMR (299.95 MHz,
CDCl3) δ 6.10 (1H, ddd, J 17.6, 11.2, 1), 5.22 (1 H, ddd, J 11.2,
2.9, 1), 4.90 (1H, dd, J 17.6, 11.2), 1.61 (3H, s), 1.02 (3H, s), 0.94
(3H, s), 0.81 (3H, s), 0.5 (1H, m), 0.42 (1H, dd, J 9.3, 3.6), -0.05
(1H, dd, J 6.0, 3.6); HRMS calcd for C21H32 284.2504, found
284.2501.
Dim eth yl (2S,5S,8S,1R,7R,11R,17R)-2,7,11,17-tetr am eth yl-
p en ta cyclo[9.8.0.02,8.05,7.012,17]n on a d eca -12,15-d ien e-15,16-
d ica r boxyla te (16). In the same manner as described above
for the conversion of 6 into 7, a mixture of 15 (36.8 mg, 0.13
mmol) and DMAD (32 µL, 0.26 mmol) was heated at 120 °C for
15 h. Chromatography of the crude product, using 8:2 hexanes-
ether as eluent, yielded the adduct 16 (50.7 mg, 92%) as a solid,
which was contaminated, as shown by its 1H NMR spectrum,
by approximately 5% of the epimeric adduct at C-13. Pure 16
was obtained by crystallization from MeOH: mp 117.5-118 °C;
Dim eth yl
(1S,7S,10S)-1,7,11,11-Tetr a m eth yltr icyclo-
[8.4.0.02,7]tetr a d eca -2,5-d ien e-5,6-d ica r boxyla te (7). A mix-
ture of diene 6 (68.4 mg, 0.316 mmol) and recently distilled
DMAD (100 µL, 0.632 mmol) was sealed in a tube under argon
and heated at 110 °C for 24 h. After cooling, the tube was opened
and the excess of DMAD was eliminated at reduced pressure.
The residue obtained was purified by chromatography eluting
with 95:5 hexanes-ether to give an approximately 95:5 mixture
of the Diels-Alder adducts (105 mg, 95%), as determined by
[R]25 +30 (c 9.4, CHCl3); IR (KBr) 1723 cm-1; 1H NMR (299.95
D
MHz, CDCl3) δ 5.62 (1H, dd, J 6.3, 1.7), 3.79 (3H, s), 3.71 (3 H,
s), 3.14 (1H, dd, J 21.7, 1.7), 2.76 (1H, dd, J 21.7, 6.6), 2.09 (1H,
ddd, J 12.8, 3.8, 3.8),1.9 (1H, m),1.57 (1H, m), 1.25 (3H, s), 0.97
(3H, s), 0.89 (3 H, s), 1.10 (3 H, s), 0.54 (1H, m), 0.5 (1H, m),
0.41 (1H, dd; J 10.0, 3.6), -0.04 (1H, dd, J 6.4, 3.6); HRMS calcd
for C27H38O4 426.2770, found 426.2774.
1
integration of the dCH signals for both adducts in the H NMR
spectrum of the mixture. Recrystallization from hexane-dichlo-
romethane gave pure 7: mp 154-156 °C; [R]22 +16 (c 2.4,
D
CHCl3); IR (KBr) 1720, 1660, 1630 cm-1; 1H NMR (299.95 MHz,
CDCl3) δ 5.64 (1H, dd, J 6.5, 1.9), 3.81 (3H, s), 3.73 (3H, s), 3.14
(1H, dd, J 21.8, 6.5), 2.77 (1H, dd, J 21.8, 1.9), 1.31 (3H, s), 1.05
(3H, s), 0.91 (3H, s), 0.85 (3H, s); HRMS calcd for C22H32O4
360.2301, found 360.2311.
Ack n ow led gm en t. Financial support from the Di-
reccio´n General de Ensen˜anza Superior e Investigacio´n
Cient´ıfica (Grant 1FD-97-0705) and the Generalitat
Valenciana (Grant GVDOC99-022) is gratefully acknowl-
edged.
(1bS,4S,5S,7bS,9aS,1aR,3aR,7aR)-1a,3a,5,7b-Tetr am eth yl-
4-vin ylp er h yd r ocyclop r op a [a ]p h en a n th r en -4-ol (14). Eth-
(19) It is noteworthy that the Diels-Alder reaction of the 1,3-diene
containing the double bond in the A ring (prepared from 12 following
the same procedure previously described for the conversion of 4 into
6) took place with identical efficacy and stereoselectivity, but in this
case and previously to the Diels-Alder reactions as showed control
experiments, the ene reaction of the A ring olefin moiety with DMAD
as enophile also occurred. Interesting, initial biological evaluation
revealed that this compound possesses promising antifungal and
â-glucuronidase inhibition activities. These results should be published
elsewhere.
(20) However, the results obtained in this work are of interest since
they could allow the preparation of tricyclic terpenoid systems with
the uncommon trans-anti-cis arrangement. For a relevant compound
of this type, see: Manes, L. V.; Crews, P.; Kernan, M. R.; Faulkner,
D. J .; Fronczek, F. R.; Gandour, R. D. J . Org. Chem. 1988, 53, 570.
This possibility is being studied in our laboratory.
Su p p or tin g In for m a tion Ava ila ble: 1H NMR spectra of
compounds 4-16, tables of 13C NMR data of compounds 4-7
(Table I), 8-10 (Table II), and 11-16 (Table III), X-ray
structural analysis of compound 7 containing crystal data,
tables of atomic coordinates, thermal parameters, and bond
lengths and angles, and the labeled structure (Figure 1 and
Tables IV-IX), optimized geometries and HF/STO-3G transi-
tion structures for syn- and anti-adducts of the reaction of 6
with DMAD (Figures 2 and 3), and spectroscopic data and
detailed experimental procedures for the preparation of com-
pounds 4 and 9-13. This material is available free of charge
(21) For general experimental information, please see ref 17.
J O9919097