foundation for our research. Our aim was to generate
porphyrins with easily modifiable groups in close proximity
to the core. Therefore, these substituents had to be placed at
the ortho-positions of the phenyl rings. TPPs with o-phenyl
substituents are subject to extensive research7 because ortho-
groups prevent aggregation and protect the core of the
porphyrin from side reactions. The modification of some
derivatives, especially of amino and hydroxy derivatives, was
extensively studied and led to beautiful molecules such as
cyclam-capped porphyrins8 and barrel-shaped systems9 with
a porphyrin center. Molecular modeling suggests that the
geometric situation of substituents in the ortho-positions
should lead to better interactions with the porphyrin core.
Also, due to the size of the porphyrin the rotation of such
groups will be strongly hindered.
about 1% ethanol as solvent and boron trifluoride-diethyl
etherate as catalyst. Porphyrin 3 was obtained after oxidation
with 2,3-dichloro-5,6-dicyanobenzoquinone (DDQ) and re-
peated chromatography (silica gel, CH2Cl2/ethyl acetate
19:1) in a yield of 7% (Scheme 2). Identified byproducts
Scheme 2a
These considerations led to the belief that a 2,6-disubsti-
tuted benzaldehyde had to be made and used in the
cyclocondensation reaction with pyrrole to yield porphyrins.
For synthetic reasons and to ensure good solubility the tert-
butyl group was included as the para-substituent. Encouraged
by recently reported improved reaction conditions for the
synthesis of TPPs with sterically encumbered benzalde-
hydes,10 we started by preparing 2,6-bis(methoxymethyl)-
4-tert-butylbenzaldehyde 1 using a modified literature11
procedure for the corresponding acid derivative.12 1 was
obtained by reacting aryl bromide 2 with n-butyllithium at
-78 °C and subsequent addition of dimethylformamide
(Scheme 1). With aldehyde 1, porphyrins 3-5 are available
a (a) i. BF3‚OEt2, CH2Cl2 (+1% EtOH), rt, ii. DDQ, CH2Cl2, rt.
were the oxidized form of dipyrromethane 6, a corrole
derivative, and a linear tetrapyrrole.
The lower symmetries of 4 and 5 required a different
approach. We decided to synthesize the porphyrin under
more or less controlled conditions. Therefore, the dipyrro-
methane 6 was made according to a literature procedure for
mesitaldehyde.13 The formation of 6 proceeded smoothly,
when aldehyde 3 was dissolved in pyrrole and boron
trifluoride-diethyl etherate was used as catalyst.
Scheme 1a
1
The dipyrromethane 6 shows in its H NMR spectrum
broad signals for the methylene and methyl protons of the
ether moiety. This seems to indicate a rotational constriction
of the phenyl group as was expected from a crystal structure
of 5-mesityldipyrromethane.14 Temperature-dependent NMR
spectroscopy will be employed to gain further insight of this
phenomenon. For the synthesis of 4 dipyrromethane 6 and
4-tert-butylbenzaldehyde were dissolved in dry methylene
chloride containing 1% ethanol. Again, boron trifluoride-
diethyl etherate served as Lewis acid. After the oxidation
step with DDQ, porphyrin 4 was obtained in 21% yield. No
scrambling15 of the dipyrromethane unit was observed under
these conditions. Also, when ethanol was not added to the
cyclization reaction the yield of product dropped well below
5%. This result is in contrast to the observations of Lindsey
and co-workers,15 who analyzed reactions of sterically
hindered dipyrromethanes with sterically unhindered alde-
hydes and found that no ethanol was needed in such cases.
The reason for this surprising behavior might be the
formation of a complex of boron trifluoride and the meth-
oxymethyl groups which is destroyed by ethanol. When
a (a) i. n-BuLi, ether, -78 °C, ii. DMF, ether, -78 °C to rt, iii.
NH4Cl, H2O, (b) pyrrole as solvent, BF3‚OEt2, rt.
by employing different strategies for their syntheses. Due
to its symmetry, 3 should be the most easily accessible
porphyrin in the series 3-5. The cyclotetracondensation of
1 with pyrrole was achieved in methylene chloride containing
(7) Wagner, R. W.; Lindsey, J. S.; Turowska-Tyrk, I.; Scheidt, W. R.
Tetrahedron 1994, 50, 11097-11112.
(8) Collman, J. P.; Zhang, X.; Herrmann, P. C.; Uffelman, E. S.; Boitrel,
B.; Straumanis, A.; Brauman, J. I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 2681-
2682. Collman, J. P.; Herrmann, P. C.; Fu, L., Eberspacher, T. A.; Eubanks,
M.; Boitrel, B.; Hayoz, P.; Zhang, X.; Brauman, J. I.; Day, V. W. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 3481-3489.
(9) Rose, E.; Kossanyi, A.; Quelquejeu, M.; Soleilhavoup, M.; Duwavran,
F.; Bernard, N.; Lecas, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 1567-1568.
(10) Lindsey, J. S.; Hsu, H. C.; Schreiman, I. C. Tetrahedron Lett. 1986,
41, 4969-4970. Lindsey, J. S.; Schreiman, I. C.; Hsu, H. C.; Kearney, P.
C.; Marguerettaz, A. M. J. Org. Chem. 1987, 52, 827-836. Lindsey, J. S.;
Wagner, R. W. J. Org. Chem. 1989, 54, 828-836.
(11) Christenson, B.; Hallnemo, G.; Ullenius, C. Tetrahedron 1991, 47,
4739-4752.
(12) Fuson, R. C.; Freedman, B. J. Org. Chem. 1958, 23, 1161-1166.
(13) Lee, C.-H.; Lindsey, J. S. Tetrahedron 1994, 50, 11427-11440.
(14) Littler, B. J.; Miller, M. A.; Hung, C.-H.; Wagner, R. W.; O’Shea,
D. F.; Boyle, P. D.; Lindsey, J. S. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 1391-1396.
(15) Littler, B. J.; Yangzhen, C.; Lindsey, J. S. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64,
2864-2872.
2130
Org. Lett., Vol. 2, No. 14, 2000