S. P. O’Connor et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 18 (2008) 4696–4699
4699
S. M.; Youssef, S.; Steinbacher, W. A.; Rendina, A. R.; Bozarth, J. M.; Peterson, T.
L.; Zhang, G.; Zahler, R. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2005, 15, 5453.
13. Adam, W.; Ahrweiler, M.; Saha-Moller, C. R.; Sauter, M.; Schonberger, A.; Epe,
B.; Muller, E.; Schiffmann, D.; Stopper, H.; Wild, D. Toxicol. Lett. 1993, 67, 41.
14. Kim, S.; Yi, K. Y. J. Org. Chem. 1986, 51, 2613.
15. Wiggall, K. J.; Richardson, S. K. J. Heterocy. Chem. 1995, 32, 867.
16. Multiple acylation products were observed with benzoyl chloride and we
experienced difficulty in separating the PyBop-derived phosphoryl triamide
by-products from the desired acylguanidines without resorting to preparative
HPLC.
17. (a) Ahmad, S.; Doweyko, L. M.; Dugar, S.; Grazier, N.; Ngu, K.; Wu, S. C.; Yost, K.
J.; Chen, B.-C.; Gougoutas, J. Z.; DiMarco, J. D.; Lan, S.-J.; Gavin, B. J.; Chen, A. Y.;
Dorso, C. R.; Serafino, R.; Kirby, M.; Atwal, K. S. J. Med. Chem. 2001, 44, 3302; (b)
Ahmad, S.; Wu, S. C.; Atwal, K. S.; Dugar, S. U.S. Patent 6,011,059, 2000.; (c)
Kitano, M.; Nakano, K.; Ohashi, N. WO 2000044707, 2000.; (d) Owens, A. H.;
Goehring, R. R.; Lampe, J. W.; Erhardt, P. W.; Lumma, W. C., Jr.; Wiggins, J. Eur. J.
Med. Chem. 1988, 23, 295.
obtaining products with good levels of purity. The FXa inhibi-
tory potential of these compounds revealed a strong preference
for the 2-methylbenzofuran in 1 (IC50 = 6 nM) relative to the
m-tolyl and p-anisyl portions of 12 (IC50 = 245 nM) and 25
(IC50 = 246 nM), respectively. However, while the intrinsic po-
tency of compound 1 was good, the concentration required
to double the prothrombin-based clotting time in human plas-
ma was low (EC2XPT = 48
lM). Compound 46 (IC50 = 10 nM;
EC2XPT = 7.5 M) displayed good intrinsic potency with a signif-
l
icantly improved prothrombin time. Further elaboration of this
chemotype will be disclosed in a more detailed publication in
the future.
References and notes
18. Lide, D. R. CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 78th ed.; CRC Press: Boca
Raton, 1997–1998.
19. Since the products were neutral and the potential impurities were either
1. (a) Ruef, J.; Katus, H. A. Expert Opin. Investig. Drugs 2003, 12, 781; (b) Hirsh, J.
Thromb. Res. 2003, 109, S1; (c) Bisacchi, G. S.. In Burger’s Medicinal Chemistry and
Drug Discovery; Abraham, D., Ed.; John Wiley, 2003; Vol. 3, p 283–338.
2. (a) Walenga, J. M.; Jeske, W. P.; Hopensteadt, D.; Fareed, J. Curr. Opin. Investig.
Drugs 2003, 4, 272; (b) Betz, A. Expert Opin. Ther. Patents 2001, 11, 1007; (c)
Steinmetzer, T.; Hauptmann, J.; Sturzebacher, J. Expert Opin. Investig. Drugs
2001, 10, 845; (d) Sanderson, P. E. J.. In Annu. Rep. Med. ChemChem.; Doherty, A.
N., Ed.; Academic Press: San Diego, 2001;Vol. 36, p 79–88; (e) Sanderson, P. E. J.
Med. Res. Rev. 1999, 19, 179.
3. (a) Lassen, M. R.; Davidson, B. L.; Gallus, A.; Pineo, G.; Ansell, J.; Deitchman, D. J.
Thromb. Haemost. 2007, 5, 2368; (b) Wong, P. C.; Crain, E. J.; Watson, C. A.;
Wexler, R. R.; Knabb, R. M. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2002, 303, 993.
4. (a) Walenga, J. M.; Jeske, W. P.; Samama, M. M.; Frapaise, F. X.; Bick, R. L.;
Fareed, J. Expert Opin. Investig. Drugs 2002, 11, 397; (b) Shimbo, D.; Osende, J.;
Chen, J.; Robbins, J.; Shimoto, Y.; Kunitada, S.; Fuster, V.; Badimon, J. J. Thromb.
Haemost. 2002, 88, 733.
charged or very polar, we first examined ion exchange as
a means of
purification. While it was possible to remove the acidic unreacted carboxylic
acid using an anion-exchange cartridge and the basic unreacted guanidine
could be eliminated with a cation-exchange cartridge, the neutral by-product
imidazole (pKa 6.95) was problematic. This contaminant co-eluted with
product from both types of ion-exchange cartridges. In addition, silica gel did
not provide a general method of purification as the products had a range of
polarities and required tedious adjustment of the solvent composition for
efficient elution.
20. (a) The conditions for LC analysis were either (a) or (b): (a) YMC S5 ODS
4.6 ꢀ 50 mm column; gradient from 10% MeOH/0.1% aqueous TFA to 90%
MeOH/0.1% aqueous TFA over 4 min; flow rate = 4 mL/min; 220 nM detection.;
(b) Phenomenex Luna 5
0.2% aqueous H3PO4 to 90% MeOH/0.2% aqueous H3PO4 over 4 min; flow
rate = 4 mL/min; 220 nM detection.
l C-18 4.6 ꢀ 50 mm column; gradient from 10% MeOH/
21. An excess of benzoic acid and CDI was used to drive all of the guanidines to
product ensuring that the reaction mixture would contain, after an aqueous
quench, only the fast eluting benzoic acid and imidazole along with the less
polar product.
5. (a) Lam, P. Y. S.; Clark, C. G.; Li, R.; Pinto, D. J. P.; Orwat, M. J.; Galemmo, R. A.;
Fevig, J. M.; Teleha, C. A.; Alexander, R. S.; Smallwood, A. M.; Rossi, K. A.;
Wright, M. R.; Bai, S. A.; He, K.; Luettgen, J. M.; Wong, P. C.; Knabb, R. M.;
Wexler, R. R. J. Med. Chem. 2003, 46, 4405; (b) Hirayama, F.; Koshio, H.;
Katayama, N.; Kurihara, H.; Taniuchi, Y.; Sato, K.; Hisamichi, N.; Sakai-Moritani,
Y.; Kawasaki, T.; Matsumoto, Y.; Yanagisawa, I. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2002,
10, 1509; (c) Choi-Sledeski, Y. M.; Kearney, R.; Poli, G.; Pauls, H.; Gardner, C.;
Gong, Y.; Becker, M.; Davis, R.; Spada, A.; Liang, G.; Chu, V.; Brown, K.; Collussi,
D., ; Leadley, R., Jr.; Rebello, S.; Moxey, P.; Morgan, S.; Bentley, R.; Kasiewski, C.;
Maignan, S.; Guilloteau, J.-P.; Mikol, V. J. Med. Chem. 2003, 46, 681; (d) Phillips,
G. A.; Buckman, B. O.; Davey, D. D.; Eagen, K. A.; Guilford, W. J.; Hinchman, J.;
Ho, E.; Koovakkat, S.; Liang, A.; Light, D. R.; Mohan, R.; Ng, H. P.; Post, J. M.;
Shaw, K. J.; Smith, D.; Subramanyam, B.; Sullivan, M. E.; Trinh, L.; Vergona, R.;
Walters, J.; White, K.; Whitlow, M.; Wu, S.; Xu, W.; Morrissey, M. M. J. Med.
Chem. 1998, 41, 3557.
22. Optimized conditions developed for the final reaction and purification steps
were as follows: to benzoic acid (18 mg, 0.15 mmol, 1.5 equiv) in 0.4 mL of
acetonitrile was added CDI (24 mg, 0.15 mmol, 1.5 equiv). After stirring at
room temperature for 5 min, compound 10 (41 mg, 0.10 mmol) was added and
the reaction progress monitored by LC. Within 2 h, the reaction was complete.
After quenching with 1 mL of water, the resulting slurry was placed directly
onto a 2 g C-18 cartridge23 and eluted with 40 mL of 20% acetonitrile in water.
The cartridge was then eluted with 5 mL of acetonitrile to yield, after
concentration, product 1 (35 mg, 0.068 mmol, 68%) as a tan foam in 96%
purity by LC analysis. This material was identical by 1H and 13C NMR, and co-
eluted on LC, LC-MS, and TLC with compound 1 produced by the alternative
method shown in Scheme 1.
6. Samama, M. M.; Gerotziafas, G. T. Thromb. Res. 2003, 109, 1.
23. The cartridges were first washed sequentially with 4–5 vol each of
methanol then water. Reaction mixtures were loaded onto the cartridges
under water. We have achieved comparable results using Varian 2 g
MegaBondElut C18 HF cartridges (cat. #14256015), United Chemical
Technologies 2.5 g Endcapped C-18 cartridges (cat. #CEC181(2500)6), or
7. Quan, M. L.; Lam, P. Y. S.; Han, Q.; Pinto, D. J. P.; He, M. Y.; Li, R.; Ellis, C. D.;
Clark, C. G.; Teleha, C. A.; Sun, J.-H.; Alexander, R. S.; Bai, S.; Luettgen, J. M.;
Knabb, R. M.; Wong, P. C.; Wexler, R. R. J. Med. Chem. 2005, 48, 1729.
8. Pinto, D. J. P.; Orwat, M. J.; Koch, S.; Rossi, K. A.; Alexander, R. S.; Smallwood, A.;
Wong, P. C.; Rendina, A.; Luettgen, J. M.; Knabb, R. M.; He, K.; Xin, B.; Wexler, R.
R.; Lam, P. Y. S. J. Med. Chem. 2007, 50, 5339.
9. (a) Straub, A.; Pohlmann, J.; Lampe, T.; Pernerstorfer, J.; Schlemmer, K.-H.;
Reinemer, P.; Perzborn, E.; Roehrig, S. J. Med. Chem. 2005, 48, 5900; (b) Eriksson,
B. L.; Borris, L.; Dahl, O. E.; Haas, S.; Huisman, M. V.; Kakkar, A. K. J. Thromb.
Haemost. 2006, 4, 121.
cartridges prepared with 2 g of J.T. Baker Bakerbond C-18 40
Packing (cat. #7025-01).
lM Prep LC
24. A modification of the reaction conditions described above was made when
synthesizing multiple acylguanidines simultaneously: the carboxylic acid
(1.5 equiv) and CDI (1.5 equiv) were combined and allowed to react for 2 h.
The guanidine (1.0 equiv) was then added and the reaction mixture was stirred
for 16 h.
10. (a) Liebeschuetz, J. W.; Jones, S. D.; Wiley, M. E.; Young, S. C. Struct. Based Drug
Des. 2006, 173; (b) Hampton, T. JAMA 2006, 295, 743.
25. We viewed this as an ‘on–off’ cartridge purification strategy whereby the
product would remain ‘on’ the C-18 packing with a high concentration of
water, while the undesired components would elute ‘off’. The concentration of
the organic component in the solvent could then be increased to elute the
product.
11. Bisacchi, G. S.; Stein, P. D.; Gougoutas, J. Z.; Hartl, K. S.; Lawrence, R. M.; Liu, E.;
Pudzianowski, A.; Schumacher, W. A.; Sitkoff, D.; Steinbacher, T. E.; Sutton, J.;
Seiler, S. M. Lett. Drug Des. Discov. 2005, 2, 563.
12. Shi, Y.; Zhang, J.; Stein, P. D.; Shi, M.; O’Connor, S. P.; Bisaha, S. N.; Li, C.; Atwal,
K. S.; Bisacchi, G. S.; Sitkoff, D.; Pudzianowski, A. T.; Liu, E. C.; Hartl, K. S.; Seiler,