COMMUNICATIONS
molar ratio ¼ 10.8/1 or 20/1 and the LHSV (mL-liquid/mL-cath), which is
the space velocity as normal liquid flow rate of the mixed solution of
reactants, is 5 hÀ1).
reaction gave only N,N-alkylmethylaminoethanols without
formation of any disproportionation products under these
conditions. Substituents on the nitrogen atom of N-alkylami-
noethanols affect the reactivity with scCH3OH mainly be-
cause of steric and electronic factors; the reactivity decreased
in the substituent order of H > CH3 > C2H5 > CH(CH3)2.
Furthermore, the lack of formation of O-methylated products
in the reaction of 1 with CH3OH under supercritical
conditions may exclude the possibility of the intramolecular
dehydration producing ethyleneimine 4, which is a main
product in the gas-phase reaction over the Cs-P-Si mixed-
oxide catalysts. These experimental results as well as those
previously reported[7] suggest that the reaction proceeds by
means of selective adsorption of 1 through the hydroxy group
on the acid base pair site of the catalyst to lead to the b-
aminoethyl silylester or the b-aminoethyl phosphate species.[7]
CH3OH should form its methylester on the neighboring acidic
sites in a similar manner. After N-methylation on the amino
group with methyl moieties through deprotonation of the
amino groups by the basic sites, these N-methylated adsor-
bates may be effectively desorbed with the aid of scCH3OH.
In contrast to the reactivity of the Cs-P-Si mixed-oxide
catalyst, which has both acidic and basic sites on the surface,
b-zeolite or amorphous silica-alumina catalysts with relatively
strong acid sites exerted unsatisfactory selectivity, while the g-
alumina catalyst, which has both strong acid and base sites,
exhibited comparatively good reactivity and selectivity.
In summary, we have described the first examples of the
selective N-methylation of bifunctional amines over the solid
acid base bifunctional catalyst in scCH3OH as well as
enhanced product selectivity on changing the pressure of
CH3OH. The use of scCH3OH, which acts as a methylating
agent and a reaction medium, as well as adjustment of the
catalyst components results in the fine-tuning of the reaction
conditions and particularly the reaction temperature for
chemoselective methylation of the functionalized amines.
Further investigations of the detailed mechanism of the
methylation of the amines, the origin of the enhancement of
the selectivity in scCH3OH, and the effect of the cogenerated
water on the reactivity[12] are now in progress.
The reaction products were identified by GC-MS analysis (Agilent 5973N-
6890N, Agilent Technologies). The selectivity and chemical yield of the
products were determined by GC analysis (GC-17A, Shimadzu Co.; FID
detector and DB-1 capillary column, J&W)). Conversion of amines Xa,
yield Yn, and selectivity Sn of each of the methylated products 2, 3, and n
were defined as:
Xa ¼ ðFaðiniÞÀFaÞ=FaðiniÞ ꢀ 100 ð%Þ
Yn ¼ Fn=FaðiniÞ ꢀ 100 ð%Þ
Sn ¼ Yn=Xa ꢀ 100 ð%Þ
ð1Þ
ð2Þ
ð3Þ
Fa(ini) and Fa represent molar flow rates of reactant amine at the reactor inlet
and outlet, respectively, and Fn represents that of methylated product n at
the reactor outlet.
During the reaction, no degradation products of methanol such as
dimethylether, carbon monoxide, and methane were detected. Methanol
was only consumed as a reactant in the N-methylation reaction.
Received: May 16, 2002 [Z19317]
[1] a) P. G. Jessop, T. Ikariya, R. Noyori, Nature 1994, 368, 231 233;
b) P. G. Jessop, T. Ikariya, R. Noyori, Science 1995, 269, 1065 1069;
c) T. Ikariya, R. Noyori in Transition Metal Catalyzed Reactions (Eds.:
S.-I. Murahashi, S. G. Davies), IUPAC, Blackwell Science, New York,
1999, pp. 1 28; d) P. G. Jessop, T. Ikariya, R. Noyori, Chem. Rev.
1999, 99, 475 493; e) Chemical Synthesis Using Supercritical Fluids
(Eds.: P. G. Jessop, W. Leitner), Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 1999; f) R.
Noyori, T. Ikariya in Stimulating Concepts in Chemistry, Wiley-VCH,
2000, pp. 13 24.
[2] As reviews: a) P. E. Savage, S. Gopalan, T. I. Mizan, C. J. Martino,
E. E. Brock, AIChE J. 1995, 41, 1723 1778; b) P. E. Savage in
Handbook of Heterogeneous Catalysis, Vol. 4 (Eds.: G. Ertl, H.
Knˆzinger, J. Weitkamp), Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 1997, pp. 1339
1347; c) A. Baiker, Chem. Rev. 1999, 99, 453 473; d) L. Fan, K.
Fujimoto in Chemical Synthesis Using Supercritical Fluids (Eds.: P. G.
Jessop, W. Leitner), Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 1999, pp. 388 413; e) R.
Wandeler, A. Baiker, CATTECH 2000, 4, 34 50; f) J. R. Hyde, P.
Licence, D. Carter, M. Poliakoff, Appl. Catal. A 2001, 222, 119 131;
g) B. Subramaniam, C. J. Lyon, V. Arunajatesan, Appl. Catal. B 2002,
37, 279 292; h) B. Subramaniam, Appl. Catal. A 2001, 212, 199 213;
i) B. Subramaniam, M. A. McHugh, Ind. Eng. Chem. Process Des.
Dev. 1986, 25, 1 12.
[3] a) G. Jenzer, T. Mallat, A. Baiker, Catal. Lett. 1999, 61, 111 114; b) A.
Fischer, M. Maciejewski, T. B¸rgi, T. Mallat, A. Baiker, J. Catal. 1999,
183, 373 383; c) A. Fisher, T. Mallat, A. Baiker, J. Catal. 1999, 182,
289 291; d) A. Fischer, T. Mallat, A. Baiker, J. Mol. Catal. A 1999,
149, 197 204; e) A. Fischer, T. Mallat, A. Baiker, Angew. Chem. 1999,
111, 362 365; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1999, 38, 351 354.
Experimental Section
The Cs-P-Si mixed-oxide catalyst was prepared by the following procedure:
Silica beads of 10 to 20 mesh size (CARiACT Q-30, Fuji Silysia Chemical
Co. LTD.) were impregnated with an aqueous solution of cesium nitrate
and ammonium dihydrogenphosphate. The crude mixture was then dried at
1208C and calcined at 5008C for 2 h in air. The Cs/P/Si atomic ratio in the
catalyst was 1/0.8/5 and the specific surface area was 7 m2 gÀ1. The acid and
base strength measured by the Hammet indicator method was weaker than
H0 ¼ þ6.3 and HÀ ¼ þ8.3, respectively. Chemisorption of NH3 and CO2 at
room temperature from the vapor phase did not occur in temperature-
programmed desorption (TPD) analysis.
[4] a) W. K. Gray, F. R. Smail, M. G. Hitzler, S. K. Ross, M. Poliakoff, J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 10711 10718; b) M. G. Hitzler, F. R.
Smail, S. K. Ross, M. Poliakoff, Chem. Commun. 1998, 359 360;
c) M. G. Hitzler, F. R. Smail, S. K. Ross, M. Poliakoff, Org. Process
Res. Dev. 1998, 2, 137 146; d) M. G. Hitzler, M. Poliakoff, Chem.
Commun. 1997, 1667 1668; e) U. R. Pillai, E. Sahle-Demessie, Chem.
Commun. 2002, 422 423; f) R. J. Bonilla, P. G. Jessop, B. R. James,
Chem. Commun. 2000, 941 942; g) R. Wandeler, N. Kunzle, M. S.
Schneider, T. Mallat, A. Baiker, Chem. Commun. 2001, 673 674.
[5] a) M. R. Edens, J. F. Lochary in Kirk-Othmar Encyclopedia of
Chemical Technology, Vol. 2, 4th ed. (Eds.: J. I. Kroschwitz, M.
Howe-Grant), Wiley, New York, 1991, pp. 1 26; b) Electronic
Release, ™Ethanolamines and Propanolamines∫: H. Hammer, W.
Kˆrnig, T. Weber, H. Kieczka in Ullmann©s Encyclopedia of Industrial
Chemistry, 6th ed., Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2001; c) Electronic
Release, ™Amines, Aliphatic∫: K. Eller, E. Henkes, R. Rossbacher,
H. Hˆke in Ullmann©s Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry, 6th ed.,
Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2001.
The N-methylation reaction of 1 in the gas or supercritical phase was
carried out isothermally in a continuous up-flow tubular reactor (SUS316
tubular reactor with a Swagelok VCR joint, 1/2 inch î 10 mm î 135 mm).
The reactor was loaded with catalyst particles and placed in an oven. A
mixture of amine and methanol was introduced into the reactor through the
preheating coil with an HPLC pump (PU1580, JASCO Co.). The pressure
in the reaction system was controlled by the automatic back-pressure
regulator (880-81, JASCO Co.) at 0.1 to 15 MPa. Standard reaction
conditions were used (5.0 mL catalyst, 3008C, 8.2 MPa, methanol/amine
3478
¹ 2002 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
0044-8249/02/4118-3478 $ 20.00+.50/0
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2002, 41, No. 18