MedChemComm
Research Article
dissolved in Et2O (12.2 cm3) and cooled to 0 °C under argon.
LiAlH4 (95 mg, 1.85 × 10−3 mol) in Et2O (3.5 dm3) was added
and the mixture was stirred for 2 h at 0 °C. 5% aq. NaHSO4
was added and diluted with Et2O. The organic layer was
washed with water and saturated aq. NaCl. It was dried with
anhydrous Na2SO4, concentrated in vacuo, and dissolved in
EtOH. DimethylIJ1-diazo-2-oxopropyl)phosphonate (495 mg,
2.58 × 10−3 mol) and K2CO3 (888 mg, 4.69 × 10−3 mol) were
added and the reaction mixture was stirred at rt under argon
for 20 h. The solution was concentrated in vacuo, diluted with
Et2O, and washed with water and saturated aq. NaCl. The or-
ganic layer was dried over Na2SO4 and concentrated in vacuo.
Silica gel chromatography (hexane/AcOEt) yielded the corre-
sponding alkyne 36 (361 mg, 53.8%, 2 steps). The other deriv-
atives were prepared similarly. Spectral details of 34–38 are
given in the ESI.†
broth were diluted 100 times with fresh broth. One loopful (5
μl, about 105 to 104 CFUs (Colony Forming Units) of bacterial
cells) of each dilution was plated using a Microplanter
(Sakuma: Tokyo, Japan) on agar plates containing the drug.
The growth of the bacteria was determined after incubation
of the plates at 37 °C for 18–20 hours.
Hemolytic activity
Rabbit erythrocytes obtained from rabbit blood (NIPPON
BIO-TEST LABORATORIES INC.) were suspended in buffer
(150 mM NaCl/10 mM Hepes-NaOH, pH 7.4) at a final con-
centration of 0.5% hematocrit. After incubation with CDs at
37 °C for 30 min, hemolysis was estimated by measuring the
absorbance at 540 nm. Lysolethicin (50 μM) was used to de-
termine the 100% level of hemolysis.
K+ efflux and cell viability
General procedure for synthesis of CD amines 1–19
Bacterial cells were washed twice with a buffer (100 mM cho-
line chloride/50 mM Mops-Tris, pH 7.2) and suspended in
this buffer at 2 × 109 cells per cm3. The final volume of the
cell suspension was 1 cm3. The cells were incubated with the
CD at 37 °C for 30 min. After incubation, 0.1 cm3 of the cell
suspension was taken, diluted with physiological saline, and
dispersed on an agar plate prepared with 1% polypeptone,
0.5% yeast extract, 0.5% NaCl, and 1.5% agar (pH was ad-
justed by adding 1 M NaOH). The colonies were counted after
being left to stand overnight at 37 °C and the viability of the
cells was determined. The remaining cell suspension was
centrifuged, and the amount of K+ in the supernatant was
measured using a K+-selective electrode. Melittin (10 μM) was
used to determine the 100% level of K+ efflux from S. aureus.
Preparation of 1-amino-2-phenylethyl-modified 18 was
performed as follows. A reaction solution was prepared by
dissolving per-2,3-acetylated β-CD octaazide 39 (19.0 mg, 1.00
× 10−5 mol) in DMSO–H2O (10 : 1) (1.1 cm3) containing the al-
kyne 37 (21.4 mg, 1.25 mol eq. of an azide group), CuSO4
·5H2O (1.75 mg, 0.1 mol eq.), and sodium ascorbate (17.3
mg, 1.25 mol eq.). After MW heating (120 °C, 10 min), ethyl
acetate was added followed by washing with 5% aq. EDTA.
Silica gel column chromatography (CH2Cl2/methanol) gave
the click reaction product (33.0 mg). Deprotection of the ace-
tyl groups with NaOMe–MeOH followed by that of the Boc
group with TFA gave the desired product 18 (76.3%, overall
yield). Other derivatives were prepared similarly. Spectral de-
tails of 1–19 are given in the ESI.†
Conflicts of interest
Bacteria
There are no conflicts of interest to declare.
The microorganisms Bacillus subtilis 168, Staphylococcus au-
reus FDA 209P, Escherichia coli K12 W3110, S. typhimurium
LT2, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 were used as drug-
sensitive bacteria. Drug-resistant bacteria MRSA (methicillin-
resistant Staphylococcus aureus) MS29202, Enterococcus
faecium MS29120, Enterococcus faecalis MS29030, VRE (vanco-
mycin resistant Enterococcus) MS29016, and Streptococcus
agalactiae Str.B-1 were clinical isolates. Their MIC values
against conventional antibiotics are shown in the ESI.†
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by JSPS Grants-in-Aid for Scientific
Research grant number 15K07857 and JST A-STEP (Adaptable
and Seamless Technology Transfer Program through Target-
driven R&D) Program grant number AS2711906T.
References
Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC)
1 J. O'Neill, Review on Antimicrobial Resistance, Antimicrobial
Resistance: Tackling a Crisis for the Health and Wealth of
Nations, supported by the Wellcome Trust and HM
Government, 2014.
2 European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control,
Antimicrobial resistance surveillance in Europe 2015, Annual
report of the European Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance
Network (EARS-Net), 2017.
MICs against B. subtilis, S. aureus, E. coli, S. typhimurium,
and P. aeruginosa were determined by the liquid micro-
dilution method, using serially diluted (two-fold) CDs. Cells
(1 × 104) were cultured at 37 °C for 20 h in Mueller–Hinton
broth (0.1 cm3) containing CDs in a 96-well microtiter plate.
The MIC was determined as the lowest concentration of CD
at which cells were unable to grow. The MICs against MRSA,
S. agalactiae, E. faecium, E. faecalis, and VRE were deter-
mined by the agar dilution method according to CLSI recom-
mendations.23 Overnight cultures of the strains grown in
3 A. P. Zavascki, L. Z. Goldani, J. Li and R. L. Nation,
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., 2007, 60, 1206–1215.
4 M. Zasloff, Nature, 2002, 415, 389–395.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2018
Med. Chem. Commun.