J. R. Neale et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 19 (2009) 680–683
683
tration of BTE2-A1 could be attributable to a differential selectivity
for ER subtypes as BTE2-A1 has an ER selectivity (ER RBA/ERb
References and notes
a
a
1. Fujisaki, J.; Tokunaga, Y.; Takahashi, T.; Hirose, T.; Shimojo, F.; Kagayama, A.;
Hata, T. J. Drug Target. 1995, 3, 273.
2. Sekido, T.; Sakura, N.; Higashi, Y.; Miya, K.; Nitta, Y.; Nomura, M.; Sawanishi, H.;
Morito, K.; Masamune, Y.; Kasugai, S.; Yokogawa, K.; Miyamoto, K. J. Drug
Target. 2001, 9, 111.
RBA) of 1.74. However, these data appear to support this bone-tar-
geting strategy, as the bone protective effects of BTE2-A1 and estra-
diol were observed at similar ED50 despite the fact that BTE2-A1
binds to the estrogen receptor with a much lower affinity than
estradiol.
3. Gil, L.; Han, Y.; Opas, E. E.; Rodan, G. A.; Ruel, R.; Seedor, J. G.; Tyler, P. C.; Young,
R. N. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 1999, 7, 901.
Additional studies will be required to determine the mechanism
of action of BTE2-A1. The ester bond linking the bone-targeting agent
to estradiol may be hydrolyzed to generate free estradiol following
the selective delivery of the compound to bone. Alternatively, intact
BTE2-A1 may mediate the selective effects on bone. Future SAR stud-
ies will be performed in which the bond linking the bone-targeting
agent to estradiol is modified from an ester to a less labile linkage
such as an amide or ether. Additionally, drug activation mechanisms
which will allow for the generation of estradiol specifically at bone
will be explored. Modifications will also be made to the bone-target-
ing agent in order to determine the effects that steric hindrance may
have on the ability of the moiety to bind to hydroxyapatite. Addi-
tionalstudieswill also be requiredtodemonstrate thatour bone-tar-
geting agent is biologically inactive and devoid of the inherent
antibacterial properties of tetracycline. However, from this study it
is apparent that our single ring bone-targeting agent maintains an
affinity for hydroxyapatite similar to that of the complete four ring
system of tetracycline and that conjugation of the bone-targeting
agent to estradiol results in a compound with selectively efficacious
effects on bone.
In summary, we have successfully synthesized and characterized
a novel bone-targeting agent modeled after the tricarbonylmethane
grouping of ring A of tetracycline. This bone-targeting agent, 3-ami-
no-2,6-dihydroxybenzamide (5), was shown to possess significant
hydroxyapatite binding affinity. A bone-targeted estrogen, BTE2-
A1 (10), was subsequently synthesized via chemical conjugation of
estradiol and the pharmacological effects of this conjugate were
evaluated in an ovariectomized rat model of osteoporosis. Using this
model, a partial separation of the skeletal effects of estradiol from
the uterine effects was observed following subcutaneous adminis-
tration of BTE2-A1, indicating that our novel osteotropic estradiol
delivery system has the potential to improve the safety profile of
estradiol in the treatment of osteoporosis.
4. Uludag, H. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2002, 8, 1929.
5. Erez, R.; Ebner, S.; Attali, B.; Shabat, D. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2008, 18,
816.
6. Yokogawa, K.; Miya, K.; Sekido, T.; Higashi, Y.; Nomura, M.; Fujisawa, R.;
Morito, K.; Masamune, Y.; Waki, Y.; Kasugai, S.; Miyamoto, K. Endocrinology
2001, 142, 1228.
7. Fujisaki, J.; Tokunaga, Y.; Takahashi, T.; Shimojo, F.; Kimura, S.; Hata, T. J. Drug
Target. 1997, 5, 129.
8. Fujisaki, J.; Tokunaga, Y.; Takahashi, T.; Kimura, S.; Shimojo, F.; Hata, T. Biol.
Pharm. Bull. 1997, 20, 1183.
9. Stepensky, D.; Kleinberg, L.; Hoffman, A. Clin. Pharmacokinet. 2003, 42, 863.
10. Hirabayashi, H.; Fujisaki, J. Clin. Pharmacokinet. 2003, 42, 1319.
11. Skinner, H. C.; Nalbandian, J. Yale J. Biol. Med. 1975, 48, 377.
12. Pierce, W. M.; Waite, L. C. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 1987, 186, 96.
13. Orme, M. W.; Labroo, V. M. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 1994, 4, 1375.
14. Wang, D.; Miller, S. C.; Kopecková, P.; Kopecek, J. Adv. Drug Delivery Rev. 2005,
57, 1049.
15. Albert, A. In Selective Toxicity; John Wiley and Sons: New York, 1979, pp 431–
433.
16. Korst, J. J.; Johnston, J. D.; Butler, K.; Bianco, E. J.; Conover, L. H.; Woodward, R.
B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1968, 90, 439.
17. Myers, H. M.; Tochon-Danguy, H. J.; Baud, C. A. Calcif. Tissue Int. 1983, 35, 745.
18. Hydroxyapatite binding assay. A 10À3 M solution for each analyte was made in
100% dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO). A 100-fold dilution was then made to form a
10À5 M solution in 50 mM Tris–HCl buffer, pH 7.4, 1% DMSO. Tetracycline was
used as a reference analyte and approximately 50% was adsorbed to HA at the
concentration of 10À5 M. The HA slurry was 0.5 g/100 mL 50 mM Tris–HCl
buffer, 1% DMSO. For each analyte, two samples were prepared. For one
sample, 1 mL of 10À5 M analyte and 100
was pipetted into a microcentrifuge tube. For the second sample, 1 mL of
10À5 M analyte and 100
of the HA slurry was pipetted into
lL 50 mM Tris–HCl buffer, 1% DMSO
lL
a
microcentrifuge tube. The samples were mixed gently by inversion for 4 min
and then centrifuged at 12,000g for 3 min to sediment the HA contained in
those samples. The supernatant was transferred to another microcentrifuge
tube. An electronic spectral scan (ultraviolet–visible) from 220 to 520 nm was
obtained for each analyte using a Varian Cary 300 Bio Scan. The blank was
50 mM Tris–HCl buffer, 1% DMSO. The wavelength of maximum absorbance
(kmax) was determined, and the extinction coefficient (
the Beer–Lambert Law. The absorbance of the samples incubated with HA was
measured at kmax and the molar concentration of the analyte was then
e) was calculated using
,
determined using the Beer–Lambert Law and the previously calculated
extinction coefficient. The fraction adsorbed to HA for each sample was
calculated.
19. Estrogen receptor competition binding assays. Purified ERa and ERb were
obtained following expression in Sf21 insect cells and were generously
provided by Dr. Carolyn Klinge of the University of Louisville. Reaction
mixtures containing 5 nM ER
concentrations of competitor were added to 40 mM Tris buffer, pH 7.4,
containing 1 mM ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA), 111 mM KCl,
0.5 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF), and 1 mM dithiothreitol
Acknowledgments
a
or ERb, 5 nM [3H]-estradiol, and increasing
We thank Carolyn Klinge, Ph.D. of the University of Louisville
for generously providing purified ERa and ERb for the competitive
estrogen receptor binding assay. This work was supported in part
by grants from the Kowa Co., Ltd, the Kentucky Science and Tech-
nology Corporation and the University of Louisville. J.R. Neale, K.G.
Taylor, L.C. Waite, and W.M. Pierce have a financial interest in
Pradama, Inc. as does author K.E. Merten as an employee of the
company. Pradama, Inc. has licensed the technology included here-
in from the University of Louisville Research Foundation, Inc.
(DTT). Total reaction volume was 60 lL. A 200-fold excess of unlabeled
estradiol was used to determine non-specific binding (0% [3H]-estradiol bound)
and 0 nM competitor represented total binding (100% [3H]-estradiol bound).
Each sample was performed in triplicate and incubations were conducted for
16 h at 4 °C. Bound and free radioligand were separated by a hydroxyapatite
(HA) slurry consisting of 10% (w/v) HA, 40 mM Tris buffer, pH 7.4, 111 mM KCl,
0.5 mM PMSF, and 1 mM DTT. A volume of 50 lL of the HA slurry was added to
the reaction mixture and vortexed briefly to precipitate the ER and stop the
binding reaction. The reaction mixture containing the HA solution and the
precipitated ER with bound ligand was centrifuged, the supernatant was
discarded, and the HA pellet was resuspended in buffer to rinse the HA pellet of
any unbound [3H]-estradiol. Scintillation cocktail was added to the HA pellet. A
scintillation counter was used to determine the amount of [3H]-estradiol
present.
Supplementary data
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in
20. Kalu, D. N. Bone Miner. 1991, 15, 175.