Organic Letters
Letter
at 120 °C in 1 mL of toluene under O2 in a sealed tube, we
were pleased to find that α-ketoester 3aa was formed in 20%
isolated yield with ester 4aa in 70% yield (Table 1, entry 1).
Scheme 2. Substrate Scope for the Formation of α-
Ketoesters from Aryl Methyl Ketones 1 and nBuOH (2a)
a
,b
a
Table 1. Optimization of the Reaction Conditions
a
Conditions: acetophenone 1 (0.5 mmol), alcohol 2 (1.5 mmol),
CuOTf (10 mol %), pyridine (0.25 mmol), TFA (0.25 mmol) in O2 in
a sealed tube, corresponding temperature, 24 h. Isolated yield based
on 1.
a
b
Conditions: 1a (0.5 mmol), 2a (1.5 mmol), catalyst, solvent (1 mL),
b
additive, T (°C), under O2 in a sealed tube. GC yield, isolated yield
listed in the paretheses. Under N2.
c
The formation of ester 4aa could be maximized to 86% by
increasing the pyridine amount (Table 1, entry 21). During
preparation of this manuscript, Jiao and co-workers reported
esterification of aryl ketones with alcohols leading to esters 4.18
Because of their report, we chose to focus on the formation of
α-ketoester 3aa. Further catalyst screening indicated that
CuOTf is the best one among CuBr, Cu(OAc)2, Cu(TFA)2,
CuCl2, and Cu2O (Table 1, entries 1−6). When temperature
was increased to 130 °C, the yield was dropped to 29%, yet
when the temperature was decreased to 100 °C the yield of
desired product 3aa increased to 53%. Further reduction of the
reaction temperature, however, attenuated the formation of 3aa
(Table 1, entries 7−9). The identity of the ligand also affected
the yield of our reaction: 3-methylpyridine and thiazole led to
9% and 52% yield at 100 °C correspondingly (Table 1, entries
10 and 11). Solvent screening indicated that toluene is the
superior choice to dioxane, MeCN, THF, DMSO, and DMF
(Table 1, entries 8, 13, and 14). If the reaction was conducted
under N2 atmosphere, only a trace amount product was
detected (Table 1, entry 12). Additives were also screened, and
the addition of TFA improved the yield to 83% (Table 1,
entries 15−17). In contrast to our previous results, increasing
the temperature to 130 °C slightly increased the yield of the
desired product to 86% yield, a significantly higher yield than in
the absence of TFA (Table 1, entry 20 vs entry 7).
this esterification reaction. Other aromatic rings, such as 2-
naphthyl and 3-thiophene methyl ketone, were compatible in
this reaction (3qa and 3ra).
The scope of alcohol for this transformation was further
explored by changing the identity of the alcohol reagent. As
shown in Scheme 3, a variety of phenylmethanols and 2-
phenylethanols could be used in our transformation regardless
of their substitution pattern or electronic nature (Scheme 3,
3ab−ak). Significantly, heteroaromatic ethanol, such as 2-
thiophene ethanol, was also tolerated under the standard
conditions to afford the desired product (Scheme 3, 3al). Both
primary and secondary aliphatic alcohols, which are susceptible
to oxidative conditions, could be used to generate the α-
ketoester in good yields (Scheme 3, 3aa, 3am, and 3an). To
demonstrate the potential use of our method in late-stage
target-oriented applications, chloresterol was examined as a
substrate. To our delight, α-ketoester 3an was formed in good
yield.
To gain insight into the mechanism of α-ketoester formation,
several control experiments were performed (Scheme 4). We
found that the reaction was inhibited if TEMPO and BHT were
added to suggest that the oxidation proceeds through a radical
pathway (Scheme 4, eq 1). The reactions of 2-oxo-2-
phenylacetaldehyde monohydrate (5), 2-hydroxy-1-phenyl-
ethanonebenzoic acid (6), and 2-oxo-2-phenylacetic acid (7)
with n-BuOH under standard conditions were also investigated,
and the desired products were afforded in 95%, 70%, and 61%
yields respectively (Scheme 4, eqs 2−4). These results
demonstrate that compounds 5−7 might be the intermediates
in the reaction process.
The ketone scope for the formation of α-ketoester 3 was
investigated using the optimized conditions (Scheme 2). A
variety of acetophenones (1) worked well with n-BuOH (2a) to
afford α-ketoesters 3 in good yields. Both electron-donating
groups, like methyl, ethyl, t-Bu, n-Bu, methoxy, and methylthiol,
and electron-withdrawing groups, such as halo and methyl-
sulfonyl, were tolerated (Scheme 2, 3ba−pa). In addition to
monosubstituted aryl methyl ketones, bis-substituted aryl
methyl ketones (3da, 3ea, and 3ja) were also well-behaved in
In order to determine the origin of the oxygen in the new
carbonyl group in the desired product, the reaction was
performed using 18O2. Analysis of the reaction mixture using
GC−MS revealed that only 16O18O-3aa was obtained
B
Org. Lett. XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX