Structure Based Design of SelectiVe MMP-13 Inhibitors
J. Am. Chem. Soc., Vol. 122, No. 40, 2000 9649
Patrick method) into related sets of structures.31 The active structures
were analyzed by their calculated physical properties (total number of
non-hydrogen atoms, number of heteroatoms, number of hydrogen-
bond donors, number of hydrogen-bond acceptors, calculated log P,
molecular weight) as well as known cytotoxicity as measured by the
3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide, when
available.
difference across the MMP family provides an obvious approach
for designing specificity into potent MMP inhibitors by design-
ing compounds that appropriately fill the available space in the
S1′ pocket while taking advantage of sequence differences. A
number of examples have been previously reported using this
approach where some selectivity between MMPs has been
achieved by incorporating a biphenyl into the S1′ pocket.8,27,28
The recent NMR and X-ray structures for MMP-13 indicated
an unusually large S1′ pocket for MMP-13 suggesting that it
may be feasible to take advantage of this feature to design a
selective MMP-13 inhibitor.8,9 Here we report a novel, potent
inhibitor highly selective for MMP-13 that has been identified
by optimizing an initial lead from high throughput screening
based on an NMR structure of its complex with MMP-13 in
conjunction with computer aided molecular design.
The properties of each compound were normalized against a set of
known orally bioavailable drugs.33 Specifically, the mean and standard
deviation of the six calculated properties were determined for the set
of orally bioavailable drugs. Then, for each assayed compound, the
normalized property value was obtained by subtracting the mean value
and dividing by the standard deviation for the known drugs. The
normalized property profiles for each structure in a cluster were plotted
side by side as a column graph to obtain the cluster’s profile, clusters
containing a high percentage of cytotoxic compounds (as measured by
the MTT assay described above) would be eliminated from further
consideration. Similarly, any significant deviation from the profiles of
the orally bioavailable drugs would also eliminate the cluster from
further analysis.
Experimental Methods
High Throughput Screening Analysis. A total of 58079 compounds
were analyzed for MMP-13 inhibitor activity in a high throughput screen
(HTS). Enzyme activity was assessed using nonlabeled recombinant
MMP-13 and a peptide substrate.29,30 MMP-13 activity was determined
using 50 mM HEPES buffer with 5 mM CaCl2, 0.02% Brij 35
(polyoxyethylene 23 lauryl ether), and 0.5% Cysteine at pH 7.0. The
HTS was a kinetic assay where compounds were screened at a
concentration of 10 µg/mL with final MMP-13 and DMSO concentra-
tions of 5 nM and <1.0%, respectively. A total of 385 compounds
were identified that inhibited g40% of MMP-13 activity. From the
385 actives, 162 structures were eliminated by visual inspection using
considerations such as synthetic accessibility and reactivity. The
remaining 223 active compounds were clustered (using the Jarvis-
Synthesis of WAY-170523. General: Melting points were obtained
on a Mel-Temp apparatus and are uncorrected. 1H spectra were recorded
at 75, 100, 300, or 400 MHz as indicated and are expressed in δ (ppm)
with TMS as an internal standard. Infrared spectra were recorded as a
KBr press on a Niclete 710. Low-resolution mass spectra were
determined on a Micromass platform electrospray ionization quadrapole
mass spectrometer. High-resolution mass spectra were determined on
a Bruker 9.4 T FTMS. Elemental analyses were performed on a Perkin-
Elmer Series II CHNS/O Analyzer and are within 0.4% of theory. Thin-
layer chromatography was performed on silica gel 60 F-254 (EM
Reagents). Flash column chromatography was carried out using silica
gel 60 (230-400 mesh). Solvents and reagents were obtained from
commercial sources and used without additional purification. All
chemical yields are not optimized and generally represent the result of
a single experiment.
(12) Lovejoy, B.; Cleasby, A.; Hassell, A. M. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 1994,
732, 375-8.
(13) Lovejoy, B.; Hassell, A. M.; Luther, M. A. Biochemistry 1994, 33,
8207-17.
Benzofuran-2-carboxylic acid (2-hydroxyethyl)amide (11): To
a solution of 2-benzofurancarboxylic acid (1.0 g, 6.16 mmol), 1-(3-
dimethylaminopropyl)-3-ethylcarbodiimide hydrochloride (1.0 g, 6.16
mmol), and 1-hydroxybenzotriazole (1.08 g, 8.0 mmol) in DMF (12
mL) at 0 °C was added ethanolamine (0.37 mL, 6.16 mmol) and
4-methylmorpholine (2.04 mL, 9.24 mmol). The reaction was stirred
at 0 °C for an additional 10 min and then warmed to room temperature
and stirred for 4 h. The reaction mixture was then diluted with ethyl
acetate, washed three times with H2O, once with NaHCO3 (saturated),
and once with brine, dried over MgSO4, and concentrated in vacuo to
provide 0.55 g (43% yield) of the desired product as a pale yellow
solid. Mp 90-91 °C. IR (KBr) 3349, 3256, 1614, 1597, 1539, 1302,
(14) Lovejoy, B.; Cleasby, A.; Hassell, A. M. Science 1994, 263, 375-
7.
(15) Spurlino, J. C.; Smallwood, A. M.; Carlton, D. D.; Banks, T. M.;
Vavra, K. J.; Johnson, J. S.; Cook, E. R.; Falvo, J.; Wahl, R. C.; et al.
Proteins: Struct., Funct., Genet. 1994, 19, 98-109.
(16) Stams, T.; Spurlino, J. C.; Smith, D. L.; Wahl, R. C.; Ho, T. F.;
Qoronfleh, M. W.; Banks, T. M.; Rubin, B. Nat. Struct. Biol. 1994, 1, 119-
123.
(17) Becker, J. W.; Marcy, A. I.; Rokosz, L. L. Protein Sci. 1995, 4,
1966-76.
(18) Gonnella, N. C.; Bohacek, R.; Zhang, X.; Kolossvary, I.; Paris, C.
G.; Melton, R.; Winter, C.; Hu, S.-I.; Ganu, V. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.
1995, 92, 462-6.
(19) Van Doren, S. R.; Kurochkin, A. V.; Hu, W.; Ye, Q.-Z.; Johnson,
L. L.; Hupe, D. J.; Zuiderweg, E. R. P. Protein Sci. 1995, 4, 2487-2498.
(20) Botos, I.; Scapozza, L.; Zhang, D.; Liotta, L. A.; Meyer, E. F. Proc.
Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1996, 93, 2749-2754.
1
1182, 1069, 743 cm-1. H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 3.43 (dq, J
) 5.85, 52.0 Hz, 5 H), 4.78 (t, J ) 5.60 Hz, 1 H), 7.33 (m, 1 H), 7.46
(m, 1 H), 7.53 (d, J ) 0.84 Hz, 1 H), 7.65 (dd, J ) 0.66, 8.56 Hz, 1
H), 7.73 (d, J ) 18.69 Hz, 1 H), 8.63, (t, J ) 5.70 Hz). 13C NMR (75
MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 41.93, 59.89, 109.57, 112.08, 123.06, 124.0, 127.07,
127.51, 149.58, 154.49, 158.53. Electrospray mass spec: m/z 205.8
[(M + H)+ C11H12NO3 requires 206.07]. Anal. Calcd for C11H11NO3:
C, 64.38; H, 5.40; N, 6.83. Found: C, 64.20; H, 5.30; N, 6.84.
(21) Broutin, I.; Arnoux, B.; Riche, C.; Lecroisey, A.; Keil, B.; Pascard,
C.; Ducruix, A. Acta Crystallogr., Sect. D: Biol. Crystallogr. 1996, D52,
380-92.
(22) Gooley, P. R.; O’Connell, J. F.; Marcy, A. I.; Cuca, G. C.; Axel,
M. G.; Caldwell, C. G.; Hagmann, W. K.; Becker, J. W. J. Biomol. NMR
1996, 7, 8-28.
(23) Betz, M.; Huxley, P.; Davies, S. J.; Mushtaq, Y.; Pieper, M.;
Tschesche, H.; Bode, W.; Gomis-Rueth, F. X. Eur. J. Biochem. 1997, 247,
356-363.
2-[[(4-{2-[(1-Benzofuran-2-ylcarbonyl)amino]ethoxy}phenyl)-
sulfonyl](benzyl)amino]-3,5-dimethylbenzoic acid (13): Benzofuran-
2-carboxylic acid (2-hydroxyethyl)amide (157 mg, 0.76 mmol) was
dissolved in DMF (1.5 mL) and cooled to 0 °C. Sodium hydride (76
mg, 1.9 mmol) was added and the reaction was stirred for 30 min. To
this solution was added acid 12 (289 mg, 0.73 mmol) in DMF (2 mL).
The reaction was held at 0 °C for an additional 30 min and then allowed
to warm to room temperature and stirred overnight. The reaction was
then quenched with 1 M HCl and extracted three times with CH2Cl2.
(24) Gonnella, N. C.; Li, Y.-C.; Zhang, X.; Paris, C. G. Bioorg. Med.
Chem. 1997, 5, 2193-2201.
(25) Moy, F. J.; Chanda, P. K.; Cosmi, S.; Pisano, M. R.; Urbano, C.;
Wilhelm, J.; Powers, R. Biochemistry 1998, 37, 1495-1504.
(26) Moy, F. J.; Chanda, P., K.; Chen, J. M.; Cosmi, S.; Edris, W.;
Skotnicki, J. S.; Wilhelm, J.; Powers, R. Biochemistry 1999, 38, 7085-
7096.
(27) Hajduk, P. J.; Sheppard, G.; Nettesheim, D. G.; Olejniczak, E. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 5818-5827.
(28) Olejniczak, E. T.; Hajduk, P. J.; Marcotte, P. A.; Nettesheim J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 5828-5832.
(29) Weingarten, H.; Feder, J. Anal. Biochem. 1985, 24, 437-440.
(30) Bickett, D. M.; Green, M. D.; Berman, J.; Dezube, M.; Howe, A.
S.; Brown, P. J.; Roth, J. T.; McGeehan, G. M. Anal. Biochem. 1993, 212,
58-64.
(31) Jarvis, R. A.; Patrick, E. A. A. IEEE Trans. Comput. 1973, C-22,
1025-1034.
(32) Denzoit, F.; Lang, R. J. Immunol. Methods 1986, 89, 271-277.
(33) Martin, E. J.; Critchlow, R. E.; Spellmeyer, D. C.; Rosenberg, S.;
Spear, K. L.; Blaney, J. M. Pharmacochem. Libr. 1998, 29, 133-146.