Upon exposure to Pb(OAc)4 in CH2Cl2, 18 underwent
smooth, stereospecific oxidative cyclization to provide the
stable lactone 19 in 74% yield. Not surprisingly, treatment
of 19 with DMDO cleanly led to a hydroxyketone (80%
yield). The diastereofacial selectivity of this reaction was in
excess of 95% as judged by proton NMR analysis.
Various arguments and counter arguments could be posited
in anticipation of the likely course of facial preference in
this epoxidation.8 In fact, X-ray analysis revealed the major
isomer to be the undesired 20b, wherein the DMDO oxidant
had approached the enol ether from its â-face.9 While we
could improve the ratio of 20a to 20b by altering epoxidation
reagents, we could not render it the major product in
satisfactory yield.10
We were not unmindful that, in principle, diasteromers
20a and 20b could be interconverted through a retroaldol-
realdol sequence (see arrow).11 In practice, however, attempts
to realize this possibility were not successful. At this juncture,
we sought to exploit the directing ability of the free hydroxyl
moiety12 which would be unveiled if the γ-lactone could be
opened. Accordingly, compound 19 was treated with lithium
methoxide, thereby affording the allylic alcohol 21 (Scheme
4). The success of this reaction under such mild conditions
mixture favoring the desired R-diastereomer.13 By performing
the epoxidation in benzene, the ratio was increased to 7:1.
However, the greatest success was realized through the use
of trifluoroperacetic acid (TFPAA), which provided a 20:1
mixture of 20a:20b. In this fashion, 20a became available
as a single isomer in 51% yield from 21, following
recrystallization (mp ) 173 °C).
Ultimately, it would be our goal to incorporate and
maintain the angular methoxy group prior to construction
of the CDEF system. However, for the present, we undertook
its installation post facto. GiVen the strain of the γ-lactone
discussed aboVe, it was anticipated that installation of R,â-
unsaturation would enable smooth Michael-type addition of
MeOH. In pursuing this conjecture, we attempted to generate
the discrete enolate of TMS-protected lactone 22 (Scheme
5). Such efforts, instead, resulted in opening of the E ring
Scheme 5a
Scheme 4a
a (a) LiHMDS, MeOH, CH2Cl2, -35 °C (51% + 40% recovered
19); (b) TFPAA, Na2CO3, CH2CL2, 0 °C; (c) TsOH, benzene, reflux
(51% for two steps). LiHMDS ) lithium bis(trimethylsilyl)amide;
TFPAA ) trifluoroperacetic acid.
a (a) HMDS, imidazole, cat. TMSCl, CH2Cl2 (84%); (b) 20b,
TMSCl, THF, then LiHMDS, then NIS (86%; see ref 15); (c)
DMDO, CH2Cl2 (71% + 17% recovered 23); (d) Tf2O, Hu¨nig’s
base, CH2Cl2 (60%); (e) CSA, MeOH (88%); (f) LiI, THF, HOAc,
reflux (55%). HMDS ) 1,1,1,3,3,3-hexamethyldisilazane; Tf2O )
trifluoromethanesulfonic anhydride; CSA ) camphorsulfonic acid.
probably reflects significant strain associated with the
γ-lactone in the context of this tetracyclic construct. In the
event, treatment of 21 with mCPBA in CH2Cl2, followed
by acid-catalyzed ring closure, provided ketols 20 as a 3:1
via â-elimination. However, upon addition of LiHMDS to
lactone 20 in the presence of TMSCl,14 the corresponding
silyl ketene acetal could be generated, as evidenced by its
reaction with a number of trapping agents.
Among the electrophiles that reacted successfully with the
presumed silyl ketene acetal was N-iodosuccinimide, which
(5) We could obtain analytically pure 10 in 10-20% yield after quickly
passing the crude material through Florisil, or in up to 50-60% of less
pure material by an aqueous wash of the crude reaction mixture. Disap-
pointingly, attempted epoxidation led predominately to decomposition,
providing only a trace of material with NMR and LRMS signals consistent
with those of the desired R-hydroxyketone.
(6) Napolitano, E.; Spinelli, G.; Fiaschi, R.; Marsili, A. Synthesis 1985,
38.
(7) Watanabe, M.; Morimoto, H.; Nogami, K.; Ijichi, S.; Furukawa, S.
Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1993, 41, 968.
(10) For instance, epoxidation with trifluoroperacetic acid provided an
approximately 1:1 ratio of 20a:20b; however, the yield was low, presumably
due to competing processes such as protonation of the enol ether and/or
Baeyer-Villiger oxidation.
(8) While approach from the bottom face is significantly hindered by
the lactone ring, epoxidation from the top face would provide the highly
strained trans-fused 6:5 ring system. Additionally, π-overlap between the
double bond and the proximal â-disposed ketone might have favored attack
from the R-face: cf. Woodward, R. B.; Bader, F. E.; Bickel, H.; Frey, A.
J.; Kierstead, R. W. Tetrahedron 1958, 2, 1.
(9) Crystallographic data for the structures reported in this paper have
been deposited with the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Center as
supplementary publication numbers CCDC-149057 (20b) and CCDC-
149058 (27).
(11) As expected, density functional calculations (pBP/DN*) confirm
that the desired 20a is favored thermodynamically with respect to 20b (3.1
kcal/mol). We thank Professor James Leighton for access to his SGI O2
running Spartan 5.1.2 to perform this analysis.
(12) For an excellent review of substrate-directed reactions in organic
synthesis, see: (a) Hoveyda, A. H.; Evans, D. A.; Fu, G. C. Chem. ReV.
1993, 93, 1307. Some years ago we made use of the sequence of ring
opening of a lactone, hydroxyl-directed epoxidation, and re-lactonization
in the total synthesis of vernolepin, see: (b) Danishefsky, S.; Kitahara, T.;
Schuda, P. F.; Etheredge, S. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1976, 98, 3028.
Org. Lett., Vol. 2, No. 22, 2000
3495