J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 11553-11554
Highly Selective Gold-Catalyzed Arene Synthesis
11553
A. Stephen K. Hashmi,* Tanja M. Frost, and J. W. Bats
Institut fu¨r Organische Chemie
Johann Wolfgang Goethe-UniVersita¨t, Marie-Curie-Strasse 11
60439 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
ReceiVed September 3, 2000
Figure 1. ORTEP plot of the solid-state structure of 4g.
The classic route to aromatic compounds with specific substitu-
tion patterns is the aromatic substitution which introduces or
exchanges substituents at an already existing arene.1 A different
mechanism but the same synthetic principle is applied in the
different transition-metal-catalyzed (cross-) coupling reactions2
or ortho-metalation and subsequent functionalization reactions.3
Other approaches assemble the arene, e.g. use cycloaddition
reactions such as the Diels-Alder reaction followed by a
subsequent oxidation of the unsaturated six-membered ring to an
arene.4 Some major achievements in this field of cycloadditions
or cycloisomerizations of the past years stem from transition metal
catalysis.5 For arene synthesis Vollhardt’s [2+2+2] cycloaddition6
and variations thereof7 as well as the Do¨tz reaction8 are among
the most prominent.
Since both allenyl and propargyl ketones are known to
isomerize to furans with the gold catalyst,12 we assumed that first
3 is formed from 1 and 2 and then 3 is transformed to 4 by the
gold catalyst in a separate step.
We now want to report our results concerning the synthesis of
highly substituted arenes, more specifical phenols, by gold
catalysis. Gold-catalyzed homogeneous organic reactions are quite
rare: the only examples that reached some importance are the
Ito-Hayashi aldol reaction9 and the addition of O- or N-
nucleophiles to unsaturated compounds first described by Utim-
oto10 and later improved by Teles.11 Recently we reported new
C-O- and C-C-bond formations catalyzed by gold; further
investigation of these reactions led to the completely new results
described here.12
Further experiments prove that assumption. AuCl3 in acetoni-
trile cleanly transformed 3 to 4. The structure of 4g was
unequivocally proven by X-ray crystal structure analyses.14 The
reactions proceeded at room temperature, neither air nor water
needed to be excluded: even when 2.7 equiv of water was added,
no addition of water to the alkyne was observed, only 4 was
formed. No paramagnetic species were formed and no gold
precipitates; the reactions could nicely be monitored by 1H NMR.
The spectra show that during the reaction no detectable concentra-
tions of any intermediates build up.
When we subjected a mixture13 of the allenyl ketone 2 and the
propargyl ketone 1 in acetonitrile to AuCl3, besides the expected
furan 3, a second product, the hydroxyarene 4, could be isolated.
(1) Electrophilic or nucleophilic: Olah, G. A. Acc. Chem. Res. 1971, 4,
240-248. Hartshorn, S. R. Chem. Soc. ReV. 1974, 3, 167-192. Pearson, D.
E.; Buehler, C. A. Synthesis 1971, 455-477.
(2) Negishi, E. Acc. Chem. Res. 1982, 15, 340-348. Brown, J. M.; Cooley,
N. A. Chem. ReV. 1988, 88, 1031-1046. Miyaura, N.; Suzuki, A. Chem. ReV.
1995, 95, 2457-2483. Mitchell, T. N. Synthesis 1992, 803-815.
(3) Chauder, B.; Green, L.; Snieckus, V. Pure Appl. Chem. 1999, 71, 1521-
1529. Snieckus, V. Pure Appl. Chem. 1990, 62, 2047-2056.
(4) Oppolzer, W. In ComprehensiVe Organic Synthesis; Trost, B. M.,
Fleming, I., Eds.; Pergamon: Oxford, 1991; Vol. 5, pp 315-399. Fu, P. P.;
Harvey, R. G. Chem. ReV. 1978, 78, 317-361.
(5) Wender, P. A.; Snapper, M. L. Tetrahedron Lett. 1987, 28, 2221-
2224. Jolly, R. S.; Luedtke, G.; Sheehan, D.; Livinghouse, T. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1990, 112, 4965-4966. Baldenius, K.-U.; tom Dieck, H.; Ko¨nig, W. A.;
Icheln, D.; Runge, T. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1992, 31, 305-307.
Wender, P. A.; Jenkins, T. E.; Suzuki, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 1843-
1844. Wender, P. A.; Takahashi, H.; Witulski, B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995,
117, 4720-4721. Saito, S.; Salter, M. M.; Gevorgyan, V.; Tsuboya, N.; Tando,
K.; Yamamoto, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 3970-3971. Saito, S.;
Uchiyama, N.; Gevorgyan, V.; Yamamoto, Y. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 4338-
4341.
(6) Vollhardt, K. P. C. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1984, 23, 539-556.
(7) Reppe, W.; von Kutepow, N.; Magin, A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl.
1969, 8, 727-733. Mu¨ller, E. Synthesis 1974, 761-774. Grigg, R.; Scott, R.;
Stevenson, P. Tetrahedron Lett. 1982, 23, 2691-2692. Schore, N. E. Chem.
ReV. 1988, 88, 1081-1119. Schore, N. E. In ComprehensiVe Organic
Synthesis; Trost, B. M., Fleming, I., Eds.; Pergamon: Oxford, 1991; Vol. 5,
pp 1129-1162. McDonald, F. E.; Zhu, H. Y. H.; Holmquist, C. R. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 6605-6606. Witulski, B.; Stengel, T. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. Engl. 1999, 38, 2426-2430.
Analysis of the spectra shows that the catalyst suffers deactiva-
tion. In the reaction of 1 and 2 with AuCl3 the deactivation of
the catalyst seems to be even faster, therefore the further
conversion of 3 to 4 is not complete when starting from these
substrates. On the other hand, only a small amount (2 mol %) of
catalyst is necessary for a complete reaction, which strongly
suggests that if the deactivation can be prevented by modification
(8) Do¨tz, K. H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1984, 23, 587-608.
(9) Ito, Y.; Sawamura, M.; Hayashi, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1986, 108, 6405-
6406.
(10) Fukuda, Y.; Utimoto, K. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1991, 64, 2013-2015.
(11) Teles, J. H.; Brode, S.; Chabanas, M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl.
1998, 370, 1415-1418.
(12) Hashmi, A. S. K.; Schwarz, L.; Choi, J.-H.; Frost, T. M. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. Engl. 2000, 39, 2285-2288.
10.1021/ja005570d CCC: $19.00 © 2000 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 11/03/2000