vitro than Crixivan, against a clinically significant mutant
strain, which proved to be orally bioavailable in dogs
(13%).2c In addition, we designed and synthesized a com-
petent pyrrolinone inhibitor of renin,2a,5 a high affinity
peptide-pyrrolinone hybrid ligand for the class II major
histocompatibility complex (MHC) protein HLA-DR1,6 and
most recently a polypyrrolinone â-turn mimic.7 The latter
exploited the D,L-alternating (i.e., heterochiral) polypyrroli-
none structural motif. Given these successes, we sought to
extend further the scope of the pyrrolinone scaffold. We
report here the design, synthesis, and enzymatic evaluation
of a pyrrolinone-based matrix metalloprotease inhibitor.
displaced nitrogens in bispyrrolinone 1, but the trajectories
of the attached hydrogens were quite similar, providing the
potential for intermolecular hydrogen bonding with the
enzyme. This low energy conformation was then docked into
the active site of the MMP-1 enzyme (Figure 2). As
Matrix metalloproteases (MMPs) comprise a family of
more than 20 zinc-containing enzymes that are involved in
the degradation of extracellular connective tissue.8 They have
been implicated in a number of inflammatory and degenera-
tive diseases including arthritis, multiple sclerosis, Guillian
Barre′ syndrome, stroke, and cancer.9 Thus, this enzyme class
represents an attractive target for the design and synthesis
of selective, small molecule inhibitors that can modulate the
severity of the underlying disease.10
The prospective MMP inhibitor 1 (Figure 1) was designed
on the basis of the Roche peptidyl inhibitor Ro-31-4724 (2),
reported to have an IC50 of 9 nM against human fibroblast
collagenase (MMP-1).11 The X-ray structure of peptidyl
inhibitor 2 cocrystallized with MMP-1 (2.2 Å resolution)12
clearly indicated that the hydroxamate in the peptidyl
inhibitor effectively coordinates to the active-site zinc(II),
and that the S1′-S3′ pockets of the enzyme are occupied
with isobutyl side chains at P1′ and P2′ and a methyl at P3′.
Energy minimization of 1 employing Macromodel 5.013 led
to a low energy model; the overlay of this model with the
Roche inhibitor (2) held in the enzyme bound conformation
(Figure 1) revealed remarkable similarities, as anticipated
from our prior work.2-7 The backbone, hydroxamate, side
chains, and carbonyls all overlaid very well, while some
differences were observed at the C-terminus. Not surpris-
ingly, the amide nitrogens of 2 did not overlay with the
Figure 2. (a) Bispyrrolinone 1 (red) docked into the active site of
human fibroblast collagenase (MMP-1) and (b) a cartoon of the
active site for clarity.
anticipated, we observed coordination of the hydroxmate to
the active site zinc(II), hydrogen bonding of both the
pyrrolinone carbonyls and NH’s with the enzyme backbone,
and S1′-S3′ occupation with the respective side chains as
observed with peptidyl inhibitor 2.
From the synthetic perspective, we envisioned construction
of 1 to exploit our base-mediated pyrrolinone ring synthetic
protocol,2-7 followed by functional group manipulation
(Scheme 1). Bispyrrolinone 9 would thus require 2 equiv of
known amino ester (-)-76 and 1 equiv of aldehyde 6.
(8) (a) Birkedal-Hansen, H. J. Oral Pathol. 1988, 17, 445. (b) Birkedal-
Hansen, H. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 1995, 7, 728. (c) Emonard, H.; Grimaud,
J. A. Cell. Mol. Biol. 1990, 36, 131. (d) Murphy, G.; Docherty, A. J. P.
Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 1992, 7, 120. (e) Baramova, E.; Foidart, J.
Cell Biol. Int. 1995, 19, 239. (f) Borkakoti, N. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol.
1998, 70, 73. (g) Johnson, L. L., Dyer, R., Hupe, D. J. Curr. Opin. Chem.
Biol. 1998, 2, 466. (h) Shapiro, S. D.; Senior, R. M. Am. J. Respir. Cell
Mol. Biol. 1999, 20, 1100.
(9) (a) Chandler, S.; Miller, K. M.; Clements, J. M.; Lury, J.; Corkill,
D.; Anthony, D. C. C.; Adams, S. E.; Gearing, A. J. H. J. Neuroimmunol.
1997, 72, 155. (b) Toi, M.; Ishigaki, S.; Tominaga, T. Breast Cancer Res.
Treat. 1998, 52, 113. (c) Michaelides, M. R.; Curtin, M. L. Curr. Pharm.
Des. 1999, 5, 787. (d) Lukes, A.; Mun-Bryce, S.; Lukes, M.; Rosenberg,
G. A. Mol. Neurobiol. 1999, 19, 267. (e) Kieseier, B. C.; Seifert, T.;
Giovannoni, G.; Hartung, H. Neurology 1999, 53, 20. (f) Curran, S.; Murray,
G. I. J. Pathol. 1999, 189, 300. (g) Whittaker, M.; Floyd, C. D.; Brown,
P.; Gearing, A. J. H. Chem. ReV. 1999, 99, 2735.
(10) Zask, A.; Levin, J. I.; Killar, L. M., Skotnicki, J. S. Curr. Pharm.
Des. 1996, 2, 624.
(11) Johnson, W. H.; Roberts, N. A.; Borkakoti, N. J. Enzyme Inhib.
1987, 2, 1.
(12) Borkakoti, N.; Winkler, F. K.; Williams, D. H.; D’Arcy, A.;
Broadhurst, M. J.; Brown, P. A.; Johnson, W. H.; Murray, E. J. Struct.
Biol. 1994, 1, 106.
(13) MacroModel, ver 5.0; Still, W. C.; Mohamadi, F.; Richards, N. G.
J.; Guida, W. C.; Lipton, M., Liskamp, R.; Chang, G.; Hendrickson, T.;
Degunst, F.; Hasel, W. Department of Chemistry, Columbia University:
New York, 10027.
Figure 1. Overlay of active-site conformation of Roche compound
Ro-31-4724 (2) with model of bispyrrolinone 1.
3810
Org. Lett., Vol. 2, No. 24, 2000