organic compounds
Figure 3
Second-level R24(8) or R44(12) hydrogen-bond motifs in (a) 1,1,3,3-
tetramethylguanidinium dihydrogen orthophosphate (Criado et al., 2000),
(b) 1,1,3,3-tetramethylguanidinium propionate (King et al., 2011), (c)
dicyclohexylammonium 4-nitrophenylsulfinate (Brito et al., 2006) and
(d) N-[2-(3-methoxyphenoxy)propyl]-m-tolylacetamidinium p-toluene-
sulfonate monohydrate (Blaton et al., 1995). In (d), the water molecule
has been omitted and the substituted phenyl rings are shown as small
spheres for clarity. The small circles in (a), (c) and (d) indicate
crystallographic inversion centres.
Figure 2
contrast with the sulfinate, the 4-methylbenzenesulfonate is
quite a common anion in the CSD, with close to 600 structures
reported to date, of which 310 are classified as ‘organic’ (i.e.
not ‘metallo-organic’). In the latter group, 55 structures
contain R44(12) ring motifs with N-atom donors. Most of them
have charged amino groups as donors; Fig. 3(d) shows one of
the few occurrences of an Nsp2 atom as donor (Blaton et al.,
1995).
Crystal packing arrangements for (a) (I) and (b) (II). H atoms not
involved in hydrogen bonds (indicated as dashed lines) have been
omitted for clarity. The large shape in (b) represents a small void,
˚
calculated by Mercury (Macrae et al., 2008) using a 0.9 A probe radius and
˚
0.5 A grid spacing. In (I), there are three ꢁ–ꢁ interactions with
˚
(C—)Hꢀ ꢀ ꢀC distances in the range 2.80–2.86 A. The corresponding
˚
distances in (II) are slightly longer and cover the range 2.86–3.06 A. Only
the major component (the sulfonate) is shown for (II).
In the Cambridge Structural Database (CSD, Version 5.34
of November 2012; Allen 2002) there are 18 structures
containing the 1,1,3,3-tetramethylguanidinium cation, of
which seven form 2:2 cyclic adducts as shown in Fig. 3. In the
structures of (I) and (II), each acceptor atom is involved in
only a single strong hydrogen bond, but there are also cases of
twofold acceptors, as seen for the dihydrogen phosphate salt in
Fig. 3(a) (Criado et al., 2000), where the graph set is R24(8)
rather than R44(12). The ring system may, as for (I) and (II),
have a central centre of symmetry, giving essentially coplanar
guanidinium cations, or they may be folded, as seen in Fig. 3(b)
for the complex with propanoic acid (King et al., 2011).
The 4-methylbenzenesulfinate (I) (or p-toluenesulfinate)
occurs in only two previous entries in the CSD (Thirupathi et
al., 2003; Betz & Gerber, 2011). Two further structures have
4-nitro substituents in place of 4-methyl (Nakazawa et al.,
2011; Brito et al., 2006), while the parent benzenesulfinate
accounts for a single entry (McDonald et al., 2010). One of the
nitro-substituted structures (Brito et al., 2006) forms a
hydrogen-bonded ring system related to (I) (Fig. 3c). In
Experimental
Acid–base complex (I) precipitated from the reaction mixture (in
tetrahydrofuran, THF) during the transformation of an ꢀ-bromo-
acetamide into an ꢀ-diazoacetamide, using the reagent ditosyl-
hydrazine and the base 1,1,3,3-tetramethylguanidine, a reaction that
generates 2 molar equivalents of p-toluenesulfinate (Kaupang, 2010;
Toma et al., 2007). The complex is soluble in dichloromethane,
acetonitrile, methanol and water, poorly soluble in THF and nearly
insoluble in diethyl ether. Only one previous report of the isolation of
complex (I) (Ragnarsson & Grehn, 2012) was found in the Chemical
Abstracts Service (CAS; American Chemical Society, 2008).
Complex (II) was obtained by oxidation of (I) in air over a period
of approximately 72 h, after which time the resulting powder was
submitted to crystallization. For a previously reported synthesis of
(II), see Vilas & Tojo (2010). A saturated solution of freshly preci-
pitated (I) in acetonitrile was placed in a beaker, which was covered
with Parafilm and stored in the dark at 277 K (refrigerator) for a
period of approximately 12 h, during which time multiple clusters of
colourless needles of (I) appeared. A selected sample of these crystals
was exposed to air over a period of approximately 72 h. A solution of
C5H14N3 ꢀC7H7O2Sꢁ and C5H14N3 ꢀC7H7O2.82Sꢁ 779
+
+
ꢂ
Acta Cryst. (2013). C69, 778–780
Kaupang et al.