Fig. 2 Crystal structure of 8a.
Fig. 3 Crystal structure of 11aA.
strated the utility of Grubbs’ catalyst 1 for the construction of
topologically novel organometallic (poly)macrocycles from
easily accessed precursors in a single step.
We thank the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG; GL
300-1/1) and US National Science Foundation for support.
Scheme 3 A trimacrocyclization reaction
Notes and references
† Crystal
C63H93O3P3W, M
hexagonal,
data;
5b/8a/11aA:
964.30/1006.47/1175.13, monoclinic/monoclinic/
31.7963(7)/24.8121(3)/18.900(8),
C44H48ClF5P2Pt/C46H66ClF5P2Pt/
Scheme 1, reactions of 7 and 1 gave 84–65% yields of
metathesized products, which were hydrogenated and chroma-
tographed on alumina. The two least polar products were
isolated in 31 and 7% yields, and shown by X-ray crystallog-
raphy to be 8a and 8b, respectively.† The structure of the former
is given in Fig. 2. Some diplatinum products form, and the
conditions for this sequence are still being optimized. However,
no traces of 9 have been detected to date—a surprising and
highly exploitable selectivity.
=
=
a
b
=
10.7342(3)/10.5438(2)/18.900(8), c = 24.9213(6)/18.0730(4)/9.842(3) Å,
V = 8311.2(4)/4575.32(14)/3045(2) Å3, T = 173(2)/173(2)/95(2) K, space
groups C2/c, P21/c, P3, Z = 8/4/2, m(Mo-Ka) = 3.570/3.246/2.017 mm21
,
=
¯
15944/17699/14105 reflections measured, 9273/10322/3555 unique (Rint
0.0683/0.0549/0.0796), which were used in calculations. Final R values: R1
[I 2s(I)] 0.0435/0.0404/0.1018; wR2 (all data)
>
=
=
0.1278/0.0796/0.1647. Two CH2 groups in 5b were disordered and could
not be fully resolved. Refined partial occupancy (C10/C10A, C11/C11A):
b007405p/ for crystallographic files in .cif format.
We sought to attempt even more speculative types of
macrocyclizations. Many tungsten triphosphine complexes fac-
W(CO)3(L)3 are known, and 10 (Scheme 3) was prepared by a
standard method.12 This could give three different types of
metathesis products, each with a plethora of CNC and/or PPh
isomers (a: one triphosphine, 16 isomers; b: one diphosphine
and one monophosphine, 18 isomers; c: three monophosphines,
4 isomers). Reaction with 1 as above and chromatography gave
a sample of empirical formula W(CO)3{PPh[(CH2)6CHN]2}3 11
(83%), as assayed by NMR and mass spectrometry. HPLC
showed three overlapping regions of many partially resolved
peaks. Hydrogenation could be effected (94%), but under no
1 Top. Organomet. Chem., ed. A. Fürstner, Springer, Berlin, 1998, vol. 1.
2 C. Alvarez Toledano, A. Parlier, H. Rudler, J. C. Daran and Y. Jeannin,
J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 1984, 576; C. Alvarez, A. Pacreau, A.
Parlier, H. Rudler and J. C. Daran, Organometallics, 1987, 6, 1057.
3 (a) B. Mohr, M. Weck, J.-P. Sauvage and R. H. Grubbs, Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. Engl., 1997, 36, 1308; (b) M. Weck, B. Mohr, J.-P. Sauvage and
R. H. Grubbs, J. Org. Chem., 1999, 64, 5463.
4 C. Dietrich-Buchecker, G. Rapenne and J.-P. Sauvage, Chem. Com-
mun., 1997, 2053; G. Rapenne, C. Dietrich-Buchecker and J.-P.
Sauvage, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1999, 121, 994.
5 R. W. Heo, F. B. Somoza and T. R. Lee, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1998, 120,
1621; M. A. Buretea and T. D. Tilley, Organometallics, 1997, 16,
1507.
6 J. M. Martín-Alvarez, F. Hampel, A. M. Arif and J. A. Gladysz,
Organometallics, 1999, 18, 955.
7 (a) P. L. Ng and J. N. Lambert, Synlett, 1999, 1749; (b) H. Seshadri and
C. J. Lovely, Org. Lett., 2000, 2, 327; (c) R. S. Paley, L. A. Estroff, J.-M.
Gauguet, D. K. Hunt and R. C. Newlin, Org. Lett., 2000, 2, 365.
8 M.-A. Guillevic, C. Rocaboy, A. M. Arif, I. T. Horváth and J. A.
Gladysz, Organometallics, 1998, 17, 707.
9 R. Usón, J. Forniés, P. Espinet, R. Navarro and C. Fortuño, J. Chem.
Soc., Dalton Trans., 1987, 2077.
10 New complexes were characterized by IR, NMR (1H/13C/31P), and MS.
All except 3b and 7 gave correct microanalyses. Representative
procedures have been described earlier.6
conditions was
a preparatively meaningful purification
achieved. Nonetheless, two macrocyclic triphosphine com-
plexes (11aA, 11aB) could be crystallized from the mixture
before hydrogenation, and X-ray structures of both were
determined.† That of 11aA, which is representative, is shown in
Fig. 3. All PPh groups are anti to the W(CO)3 moiety in 11aA,
whereas one is syn in 11aB. Each has three E-CNC linkages.
The preceding syntheses have many noteworthy features.
First, a variety of complexes with trans-spanning diphosphines
are known.13 However, our route is the first to link two existing
monophosphines with a hydrocarbon tether. Second, doubly
trans-spanning diphosphines such as in 8 are to our knowledge
unknown. However, a conceptually similar two-fold ring-
closing metathesis involving trans 2,6-disubstituted pyridine
ligands has recently been reported.7a Here, the pyridine
geometry favors the formation of trans-spanning bridges,
whereas 7 lacks a structure-based driving force. Third, in
contrast to the surprisingly selective conversion of 7 to 8, 10
appears to give virtually every possible product. Such behavior,
disparaged in the past, is now praised as an efficient route to a
combinatorial library. Importantly, other strategies have been
used to effect high-yield template syntheses of 10–15 mem-
bered facially-spanning triphosphine complexes from tris-
monophosphine complexes.14 In conclusion, we have demon-
5
11 J. M. Martín-Alvarez and C. H. Horn, unpublished results with [(h -
C5Me5)Re(NO)(6)(L)]n+ systems.
12 G. J. Kubas, Inorg. Chem., 1983, 22, 692.
13 Recent lead references to trans-spanning phosphine ligands: D.
Armspach and D. Matt, Chem. Commun., 1999, 1073; W. J. Perez, C. H.
Lake, R. F. See, L. M. Toomey, M. R. Churchill, K. J. Takeuchi, C. P.
Radano, W. J. Boyko and C. A. Bessel, J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans.,
1999, 2281.
14 B. N. Diel, P. F. Brandt, R. C. Haltiwanger, M. L. J. Hackney and A. D.
Norman, Inorg. Chem., 1989, 28, 2811; P. G. Edwards, P. D. Newman
and D. E. Hibbs, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2000, 39, 2722 and extensive
earlier work cited therein.
2262
Chem. Commun., 2000, 2261–2262