Fig. 5 Schematic representation of the metal-ion complexation with
macroligand tpy~PSm~UPy leading to supramolecular metallo-
polymers 7 and 8.
Fig. 7 SEC-traces of tpy~PS60~UPy (6b) and [bis-tpy]nickel(II) complex
8. Eluent: N,N-Dimethyl formamide (DMF) with 0.005 M NH4PF6.
The prepared telechelic polymers are promising building
blocks for the stepwise construction of supramolecular archi-
tectures. The Upy gives rise to the formation of hydrogen-
bonded dimers as demonstrated by 1H NMR spectroscopy
while the tpy unit can be used for the formation of metal
complexes (Fig. 5). To investigate the potential metal coordi-
nation of the heterotelechelic polymers, UV-vis-titration
experiments were performed:3a a methanol solution of iron(II)
chloride was added stepwise to a chloroform solution of
‘‘tpy~PS120~UPy’’. A linear increase of both the metal-to-
ligand charge-transfer (MLCT) band of the iron(II) complex
at 559 nm and the ligand-centered (LC) band of terpyridine at
318 nm was observed confirming the formation of the
[bis-tpy]iron(II) complex (Fig. 6). The equivalence point is indi-
cated by a significant change in the slope at both wavelengths,
whereby a plateau was reached for the MLCT absorption. The
molar mass calculated from UV-vis (Mn = 9000 g molꢀ1) is
comparable to the SEC-value (Mn = 11400 g molꢀ1).
A complete shift to higher molar masses was observed
indicating near-quantitative complexation (Fig. 7).
However, a shoulder at higher molar masses was observed that
cannot be explained up to now. Similar shoulders were also
observed for purified polymeric nickel(II) complexes12 suggesting
that the shoulder is not necessarily caused by side products, but
might be due to different solvation or interactions with the column.
To summarize, the synthesized ‘‘tpy~TIPNO~UPy’’ alkoxy-
amine represents a powerful NMP initiator for the one-step
preparation of well-defined heterotelechelic polymers as supra-
molecular building blocks. This approach is attractive for the
creation of polymer libraries towards tailor-made architec-
tures, since the nature and length of the polymeric spacer
between the supramolecular motifs can be controlled in a
facile way. In addition, the orthogonal non-covalent binding
units in the polymers are believed to provide access to
extended stimuli responsiveness opening new pathways towards
‘‘smart’’ materials, which will be investigated in future work.
Besides a change in the optical properties upon metal
complexation, an increase in molar mass should be detectable
by SEC for the complexation of macroligand ‘‘tpy~PSm~UPy’’.
To be able to analyze the tpy metal complex system, polar
SEC-conditions were utilized that suppress the formation of
hydrogen-bonded dimers. In particular, [bis-tpy]nickel(II)
complexes are stable under the used SEC-conditions12 and,
therefore, the complexation of the macroligand with nickel(II)
acetate was performed in a mixture of methanol and chloroform.
The product was characterized by SEC without purification.
Notes and references
1 (a) L. Brunsveld, B. J. B. Folmer, E. W. Meijer and R. P. Sijbesma,
Chem. Rev., 2001, 101, 4071–4098; (b) U. S. Schubert and
C. Eschbaumer, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2002, 41, 2892–2926.
2 P. Cordier, F. Tournilhac, C. Soulie-Ziakovic and L. Leibler,
Nature, 2008, 451, 977–980.
3 (a) H. Hofmeier and U. S. Schubert, Chem. Commun., 2005,
2423–2432; (b) J. M. Pollino, L. P. Stubbs and M. Weck, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 2004, 126, 563–567.
4 H. Hofmeier, M. E. L. Wouters, R. Hoogenboom and
U. S. Schubert, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2005, 127, 2913–2921.
5 (a) C. J. Hawker, A. W. Bosman and E. Harth, Chem. Rev., 2001,
101, 3661–3688; (b) K. Matyjaszewski and J. Xia, Chem. Rev.,
2001, 101, 2921–2990.
6 (a) D. Benoit, V. Chaplinski, R. Braslau and C. J. Hawker, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 1999, 121, 3904–3920; (b) M. Rodlert, E. Harth,
I. Rees and C. J. Hawker, J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem.,
2000, 38, 4749–4763.
7 (a) S. Marque, H. Fischer, E. Baier and A. Studer, J. Org. Chem.,
2001, 66, 1146–1156; (b) A. Nilsen and R. Braslau, J. Polym. Sci.,
Part A: Polym. Chem., 2006, 44, 697–717.
8 R. Nicolay, L. Marx, P. Hemery and K. Matyjaszewski,
Macromolecules, 2007, 40, 6067–6075.
9 J. Dao, D. Benoit and C. J. Hawker, J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym.
Chem., 1998, 36, 2161–2167.
10 B. G. G. Lohmeijer and U. S. Schubert, J. Polym. Sci., Part A:
Polym. Chem., 2004, 42, 4016–4027.
11 B. J. B. Folmer, R. P. Sijbesma, R. M. Versteegen, J. A. J. van der
Rijt and E. W. Meijer, Adv. Mater., 2000, 12, 874–878.
12 M. Chiper, J. M. Kranenburg, M. A. R. Meier and U. S. Schubert,
Macromol. Chem. Phys., 2007, 208, 679–689.
Fig. 6 UV-vis titration of tpy~PS120~UPy (6c) with FeCl2 revealing
the formation of the [bis-tpy]iron(II) complex 7 in chloroform by the
appearance of the MLCT band at 559 nm and the LC band at 318 nm.
The inset shows their absorption increase with addition of FeCl2.
ꢁc
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2009
3388 | Chem. Commun., 2009, 3386–3388