10
reaction was performed with >95% H2O2 and freshly
corresponding perfluorocarboxylic peracid (RfCOOOH). The
rapid ion exchange process in polar perfluorocarboxylic acid
also facilitates the catalytic activity. This result supports
accepting a general scheme for BPFAP formation (Scheme
3).
distilled trifluoroacetic anhydride (TFAAn) with concentra-
tion ratios of [TFAAn]/[H2O2] ) 0-10 at room temperature.
19F NMR analyses of the reaction mixtures at different ratios
shows the stoichiometric formation of TFPAA (δ -74.3),
trifluoroacetic acid (TFAA, δ -77.7), and nonreacted
TFAAn (δ -77.1) when the ratio [TFAAn]/[H2O2] is greater
than 1. When the ratio was greater than 5, only traces of
bis(trifluoroacetyl) peroxide11 (BTFAP, δ -72.8) appeared
in the reaction mixture. Nonetheless, the presence of BTFAP
in the reaction media indicated the feasibility of BTFAP
formation. It was reasonable to infer that acidic or basic
catalysis could facilitate this ionic process. Acidic catalysts
(H2SO4, BF3) did not change the ratio of components.
However, the addition of trace amounts of sodium or
potassium salts of TFAA (less than 0.1% of the concentration
of H2O2), dramatically changed the product distribution. The
peak for TFPAA completely disappeared, and the peak for
BTFAP appeared when the ratio of [TFAAn]/[H2O2] was
greater than or equal to 2. The essentially irreversible
character of this catalytic, consecutive process was character-
ized by Figure 1. Figure 1 also demonstrates quantitative
transfer of active oxygen from H2O2 into TFAAn.
Scheme 3
The stoichiometry of the entire process (Scheme 3) shows
that the ratio of [bis(perfluoroacyl) anhydride]/[H2O2] should
be equal to 2 (if 100% H2O2) in order to receive the highest
concentration of BPFAP. If the ratio of [bis(perfluoroacyl)
anhydride]/[H2O2] is less than or equal to 1 (zone 1), an
equivalent amount of perfluorocarboxylic peracid and per-
fluorocarboxylic acid is formed. If this ratio is greater than
1 and less than 2 (zone 2), the solution would contain
perfluorocarboxylic peracid, BPFAP, and perfluorocarboxylic
acid. When this ratio is greater than 2 (zone 3), the solution
(10) Pizey, S. J. Synthetic Reagents; John Wiley & Sons: New York,
1985; Vol. 6, p 60.
(11) Kopitzky, R.; Willner, H.; Hermann, A.; Oberhammer, H. Inorg.
Chem. 2001, 40, 2693.
(12) General procedure for the preparation of a solution of bis-
(perfluoroacyl) peroxide (BPFAP) in the corresponding perfluorocarboxylic
acid: 95% H2O2 (1.70 g, 47.5 mmol H2O2) was added dropwise into a
well-stirred solution of RfCOOK (0.047 mmol) in freshly distilled bis-
(perfluoroacyl) anhydride (100 mmol) at 0 °C. After addition of the H2O2,
the reaction mixture was stirred for 10 min at 0 °C. A 31% (mol) solution
of BPFAP in perfluorocarboxylic acid was obtained. It is possible to use
less concentrated H2O2. In this case the solution of bis(perfluoroacyl)
peroxide in perfluorocarboxylic acid would be less concentrated to a
corresponding degree. For example 8% (mol) solution of BPFAP in
perfluorocarboxylic acid was obtained when 30% H2O2 (1.77 g, 15.6 mmol
H2O2) was added dropwise into a well-stirred solution of RfCOOK (0.047
mmol) in freshly distilled bis(perfluoroacyl) anhydride (100 mmol) at 0
°C. After addition of the H2O2, the reaction mixture was stirred for 10 min
at 0 °C. The concentration of BPFAP was measured by 19F NMR spectra.
19F chemical shifts are given relative to external CFCl3. BTFAP 19F NMR
(CF3COOH, 282.2 MHz): δ -72.8. Bis(pentafluoropropanonyl) peroxide
19F NMR (C2F5COOH, 282.2 MHz): δ -85.1, -121.3. Bis(heptafluoro-
butanoyl) peroxide 19F NMR (C3F7COOH, 282.2 MHz): δ -82.6, -118.4,
-128.2. Bis(nonafluoropentanoyl) peroxide 19F NMR (C4F9COOH, 282.2
MHz): -83.2, -117.9, -124.8, -127.5.
(13) Gaussian 98, revision A.5; Frisch, M. J.; Trucks, G. W.; Schlegel,
H. B.; Scuseria, G. E.; Robb, M. A.; Cheeseman, J. R.; Zakrzewski, V. G.;
Montgomery, J., Jr. A.; Stratmann, R. E.; Burant, J. C.; Dapprich, S.; Millam,
J. M.; Daniels, A. D.; Kudin, K. N.; Strain, M. C.; Farkas, O.; Tomasi, J.;
Barone, V.; Cossi, M.; Cammi, R.; Mennucci, B.; Pomelli, C.; Adamo, C.;
Clifford, S.; Ochterski, J.; Petersson, G. A.; Ayala, P. Y.; Cui, Q.;
Morokuma, K.; Malick, D. K.; Rabuck, A. D.; Raghavachari, K.; Foresman,
J. B.; Cioslowski, J.; Ortiz, J. V.; Stefanov, B. B.; Liu, G.; Liashenko, A.;
Piskorz, P.; Komaromi, I.; Gomperts, R.; Martin, R. L.; Fox, D. J.; Keith,
T.; Al-Laham, M. A.; Peng, C. Y.; Nanayakkara, A.; Gonzalez, C.;
Challacombe, M.; Gill, P. M. W.; Johnson, B.; Chen, W.; Wong, M. W.;
Andres, J. L.; Head-Gordon, M.; Replogle, E. S.; Pople, J. A. Gaussian,
Inc.: Pittsburgh, PA, 1998.
Figure 1. Molar concentration of fluorine-containing products vs.
the ratio [TFAAn]/[H2O2] in the presence of CF3COO-.
The same observation was made for other perfluorinated
anhydrides (Rf ) C2F5, C3F7, C4F9).12 To clarify accurately
the energetic feasibility of this process, DFT computations
at the B3LYP/6-31G(d) level, as implemented in a Gaussian
98 program, were employed.13 The results of these calcula-
tions indicated that this process was energetically rather
favorable (Scheme 2).
Scheme 2
The efficiency of basic catalysis for this process is
understandable, because of the higher nucleophilicity of
perfluoropercarboxylate ion (RfCOOO-) compared to the
2998
Org. Lett., Vol. 3, No. 19, 2001