The syn-1,3-diol structural unit is a common motif in many
natural products with a wide range of biological activities.6
Due to the wide distribution of the syn-1,3-polyol motif in
natural products, many synthetic methodologies have been
employed to synthesize this core structure. These range from
the use of stoichiometric chiral reagents such as enolates7
and allyl anions8 to the more elegant use of catalytic
reagents.9 Perhaps the most successful application of enan-
tioselective catalysis is Rychnovsky’s5,6 use of the Noyori
hydrogenation.10 More recently, Leighton has developed two
carbonylation approaches to 1,3-syn-diols of type 1.11
Recently, we developed several effective routes to various
carbohydrate-based natural products using the Sharpless
dihydroxylation and aminohydroxylation to establish the
absolute stereochemistry.12 Continuing our investigations on
the utility of these transformations, we decided to investigate
its merit toward the synthesis of the syn-1,3-diol structural
motif. We envisioned establishing 3,5-dihydroxy carboxylic
esters from δ-hydroxy-1-enoates 4, which Evans has shown
can be converted into a benzylidene-protected 3,5-dihydroxy
carboxylic ester 3 in a single step (Scheme 2).13
of a 3,4-dihydroxy-1-enoate, which in turn could be prepared
via an asymmetric dihydroxylation of a dienoate such as 6.15
Miyashita has developed a similar reduction strategy to
prepare δ-hydroxy-1-enoates from γ,δ-epoxy acrylates.4a
Herein, we describe our approach to the synthesis of these
key building blocks via an efficient asymmetric and dia-
stereoselective reaction sequence.
To test the feasibility of this sequence, we decided to start
with commercially available ethyl sorbate (6a). Following
Sharpless’s protocol for the dihydroxylation of 6a, diol 5a
was provided in good yields and enantiomeric excesses
(Scheme 3).16,17 Either enantiomer of diol 5a was obtained
Scheme 3
Scheme 2
with enantiomeric excesses on the order of 80% from the
(DHQ)2PHAL ligand system and > 90% from the (DHQD)2-
PHAL ligand.
Diol 5a was conveniently converted into bis-benzoate 7
or bis-ethyl carbonate 8 by treatment with benzoyl chloride
or ethyl chloroformate (57 and 81% yields, respectively).
At this stage the two functional groups were readily
differentiated by taking advantage of the fact that allyl
benzoates and carbonates are good leaving groups for the
formation of π-allyl palladium complexes.18
Thus, treatment of 7 with a catalytic amount of a
palladium(0) source and triphenylphosphine (2.5% Pd2(dba)3‚
CHCl3/6.3% PPh3) and a mild hydride source (3 equiv, Et3N/
HCO2H) gave the reduced product 9 in low yield (43%)
Thus, the problem was reduced to an efficient asymmetric
synthesis of δ-hydroxy-1-enoates.14 We hoped these δ-hy-
droxy-1-enoates could be prepared by the selective reduction
(5) Rychnovsky, S. D. Chem. ReV. 1995, 95, 2021-2040.
(6) (a) Rychnovsky, S. D.; Hoye, R. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116,
1753-1765. (b) Rychnovsky, S. D.; Khire, U. R.; Yang, G. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1997, 119, 2058-2059.
(7) (a) Evans, D. A. Aldrichimica Acta. 1982, 2, 23. (b) Evans, D. A.;
Nelson, J. V.; Taber, T. R. Top. Stereochem. 1982, 13, 1.
(8) For good reviews see: (a) Hoffmann, R. W. Pure Appl. Chem. 1988,
60(1), 123-30. (b)Yamamoto, Y.; Asao, N. Chem. ReV. 1993, 93, 2207-
2293.
(9) (a) Carreira, E. M.; Singer, R. A.; Lee, W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994,
116, 8837-8838. (b) Evans, D. A.; Murry, J. A.; Kozlowski, M. C. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 5814-5815. (c) Evans, D. A.; Coleman, P. J.; Cote,
B. J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 788-789. (d) Paterson, I.; Oballa, R. M.;
Norcross, R. D. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 8581-8584. (e) Paterson, I.;
Gibson, K. R.; Oballa, R. M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 8585-8588.
(10) Noyori, R.; Hashiguchi, S. Acc. Chem. Res. 1997, 30, 97-102.
(11) (a) Leighton, J. L.; O’Neil, D. N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119,
11118-11119. (b) Sarraf, S. T.; Leighton, J. L. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 3205-
3208. (c) Leighton, J. L.; Chapman, E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119,
12416-12417.
(14) For vinylogous aldol approaches to δ-hydroxy-1-enoates, see: (a)
Fleming, I. Bull. Soc. Chem. Fr. 1981, 2, 7-13. (b) Barloy-Da Silva, C.;
Benkouider, A.; Pale, P. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 3077-3081. (c)
Albaugh-Robertson, P.; Katzenellenbogen, J. A. J. Org. Chem. 1983, 48,
5288-302. For aldol/Wittig approaches, see: ref 4 and (d) Keck, G. E.;
Palani, A.; McHardy, S. F. J. Org. Chem. 1994, 59, 3113. (e) Solladie, G.;
Gressot, L.; Colobert, F. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 357-364.
(15) Previously Sharpless had shown that the AD mix reagent dihy-
droxylates simple dienoates 6a and 6c with good enantio- and diastereo-
control, see: (a) Xu, D.; Crispino, G. A.; Sharpless, K. B. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1992, 114, 7570-7571. (b) Becker, H.; Soler, M. A.; Sharpless, K. B.
Tetrahedron 1995, 51, 1345-76.
(12) (a) Harris, J. M.; O’Doherty, G. A. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 2983-2986.
(b) Harris, J. M.; Keranen, M. D.; Nguyen, H.; Young, V. G.; O’Doherty,
G. A. Carbohydr. Res. 2000, 328, 17-36. (c) Balachari, D.; O’Doherty,
G. A. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 863-866. (d) Harris, J. M.; Keranen, M. D.;
O’Doherty, G. A. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 2982-2983. (e) Haukaas, M.
H.; O’Doherty, G. A. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 401-404.
(16) All levels of enantioinduction were determined by HPLC analysis
(8% IPA/Hexane, Chiralcel OD) and/or Mosher ester analysis. (a) Sullivan,
G. R.; Dale, J. A.; Mosher, H. S. J. Org. Chem. 1973, 38, 2143. (b)
Yamaguchi, S.; Yasuhara, F.; Kabuto, K. T. Tetrahedron 1976, 32, 1363.
(17) All new compounds were identified and characterized by 1H NMR,
13C NMR, FTIR, HRMS, and/or elemental analysis.
(13) See: ref 4b and Evans, D. A. Gauchet-Prunet, J. A. J. Org. Chem.
1993, 58, 2446-2453.
(18) (a) Tsuji, J.; Minami, I. Acc. Chem. Res. 1987, 20, 140. (b) Hughes,
G.; Lautens, M.; Wen, C. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 107-110.
1050
Org. Lett., Vol. 3, No. 7, 2001