C. Shen, et al.
PhytochemistryLetters36(2020)68–72
esterification with trifluoromethanesulfonic anhydride in a mixture of
anhydrous pyridine and DCM. Subsequent nucleophilic substitution of
triflate 5 with KNO2 and simultaneous hydrolysis under H2O afforded
1,3,5-tri-O-benzoyl-α-L-arabinofuranose
6 with 52 % yield. En-
couragingly, a single crystal of L-arabinofuranose 6 suitable for X-ray
crystallography was obtained and its structure was ambiguously con-
firmed (Fig. 3)1 . Details of structure refinement for 6 was given in
Fig. 3. ORTEP molecular structure of 1,3,5-tri-O-benzoyl-α-L-arabi-
Next, methylation of 2−OH of compound 6 was investigated.
Literature survey revealed that CH3I/Ag2O and trimethylsilyl diazo-
methane (TMSCHN2)/HBF4 were frequently used for the O-methylation
base, transesterification of benzoyl to 2−OH occurred and a compli-
experiment, L-arabinose methyl ether 7 was successfully obtained but in
low yield accompanied by unreacted starting material. After extensive
optimization of solvents, reaction temperature, equivalence ratios of
TMSCHN2 and HBF4, it was found that the best condition was using of
1.0 equiv. 1,3,5-tri-O-benzoyl-α-L-arabinofuranose 6, 2.0 equiv. of
TMSCHN2, and 1.0 equiv. of HBF4 in DCM at room temperature. The
results are depicted in supporting information (Table S2). It affords
methyl ether 7 in 70 % yield accompanied with 20 % unreacted starting
material arabinose 6.
Fig. 3. ORTEP molecular structure of 1,3,5-tri-O-benzoyl-α-L-arabinofuranose
6.
Table 1
13C Chemical shifts of nucleosides 1, 2, 3 and the reported nucleosidea.
Subsequent, vorbrüggen glycosylation of uracil with methyl ether 7
was performed in MeCN/BSA/TMSOTf. It afforded the β-L-arabinosy-
luridine 8 and α-L-arabinosyluridine 9 (approximation ratio of 3:1) as
expected in 74 % yield. Careful recrystallization of the mixed isomers
can give part of nucleoside 8 as a white solid. The remaining residue
containing the mixed isomers 8 and 9 was difficult to separate using
silica gel chromatography. Thus, the mixture was subjected to a satu-
rated solution of ammonia in methanol directly to afforded nucleoside 1
and 2, which can be separated successfully by HPLC. Discrimination of
the α-anomer and β-anomer was done based on 3JH1′,H2′ coupling
constant. The resonances for the anomeric hydrogens of α/β-L-arabi-
nosyluridine appeared as a doublet (3JH1′,H2′ =2.9 Hz) at δ 5.81 ppm
and a doublet (3JH1′,H2′ =5.6 Hz) at δ 6.13 ppm, respectively (Remin
1/CD3OD [α]eq
2/ CD3OD [α]eq 3/CD3OD [α]eq Reported/CD3OD
\o(\s\up 6(20),
\o(\s\up 6(20),
[α]eq \o(\s\up
\s\do 2()) -136b \s\do 2()) -16.7b \s\do 2()) -44b
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
59.0
61.8
74.6
85.1
85.6
87.0
101.3
144.1
152.2
58.5
58.8
58.8
62.8
61.6
61.8
75.5
69.7
69.8
90.3
85.0
85.2
91.5
86.1
86.2
92.0
88.8
88.9
100.2
143.1
152.1
166.4
102.5
142.4
152.1
166.2
102.8
142.6
152.0
166.6
10 166.2
a
b
Recorded at c = 0.050 in CH3OH.
Table 1 13C Chemical shifts of nucleosides 1, 2, 3 and the reported
uridine 11 was obtained in 80 % yield. Next, 2,2′-anhydro-β-L-arabi-
nosyluridine 12 was prepared in 70 % yield by refluxing nucleoside 11
with diphenyl carbonate. In addition, a single crystal of nucleoside 12
suitable for X-ray crystallography was also obtained and its structure
was ambiguously confirmed. The molecules form stacked dimers which
are linked by two hydrogen bonds (Fig. 4)2 . Details of structure re-
2′-O-methyl-β-L-uridine 3 was prepared by refluxing nucleoside 12 with
freshly prepared magnesium methoxide in 75 % yield.
Further comparing the reported 13C NMR chemical shift of 2′-O-
methyl-β-L-arabinosyluridine isolated from the broth of Penicillium sp.
(NO. 64) with the synthetic sample, it clearly showed different data
(Table 1). This inconsistency proved that the nucleoside structure from
the broth of Penicillium (NO. 64) is not 2′-O-methyl-β-L-arabinosylur-
idine indeed.
Revisiting the two-dimensional NMR data, we supposed that the
uridine might be 2′-O-methyl-β-L-uridine instead of the former reported
2′-O-methyl-β-L-arabinosyluridine. Although 2′-O-methyl-β-D-uridine
was commercially available, 2′-O-methyl-β-L-uridine was not reported
yet. In order to further verify its structure, synthesis of 2′-O-methyl-β-L-
Fig. 4. ORTEP molecular structure of 2,2′-anhydro-β-L-arabinosy-
After 2′-O-methyl-β-L-uridine was obtained, we were glad to find
that all the NMR spectroscopy of synthesized are in accordance with the
nucleoside isolated from Penicillium sp. (NO. 64) (Table 1). Further-
more, the specific optical rotations of nucleosides isolated from Peni-
cillium sp. (NO. 64) and synthesized by L-ribofuranose are [α]eq \o(\s
\up 6(20),\s\do 2(-68 and [α]eq \o(\s\up 6(20),\s\do 2(-44 (c =
0.050) respectively. Therefore, we reassigned the nucleoside isolated
from Penicillium sp. (NO. 64) as 2′-O-methyl-β-L-uridine. To the best of
Synthesis of 2′-O-methyl-β-L-uridine started from 1,2,3,5-tetra-O-
acetyl-β-L-ribofuranose, which was conveniently prepared using L-ri-
glycosylation between 1,2,3,5-tetra-O-acetyl-β-L-ribofuranose and ur-
acil gave L-nucleoside 10 in 60 % yield. After Zemplén saponification, L-
1 CCDC 1940346 Contains the Supplementary Crystallographic Data.
2 CCDC 1940359 Contains the Supplementary Crystallographic Data.
70