J.-B. Regnouf-de-Vains et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 42 (2001) 2681–2684
Table 1. Extraction operating data—first series of experiments
2683
Ag/Pb Pb(NO3)2 mg (mol)
AgNO3 mg H2O (ml) [Pb]; [Ag] 1 mg
CHCl3 (ml) [1] (10−3 M) Ag/1 2-PF6 (mg) Yield (%)
(10−5 mol)
(10−3 M) (10−5 mol)
(10−5 mol)
1
28.90 (8.7×10−5
28.70 (8.66×10−5
)
)
15.00 (8.8)
10
8.7; 8.8
8.7; 1.06 10 (0.84) 10
168; 1.85
835; 0.88
838; 0.10
50 (4.2)
25
1.70
0.84
2.80
4.20
0.84
2.1
1.3
1.1
1.0
1.3
56 (3.9)
11.2 (0.78) 93
115 (8.0)
114 (7.9)
12 (0.83)
93
1/10
1/100
1.80 (1.06) 10
15.70 (9.24) 50
14.90 (8.77) 100
1.80 (1.06) 100
2790 (8.4×10−3
)
)
)
100 (8.4)
100 (8.4)
10 (0.84) 10
30
20
95
94
98
1/1000 27750 (8.35×10−2
1/10000 27750 (8.35×10−2
A second set of experiments8 was carried out in order
to develop a continuous extraction process. It was
performed in a decantation funnel containing an
aqueous solution of Pb(NO3)2 at 600 g.l−1, at the limit
of saturation at rt, charged before extraction with
AgNO3. The initial Ag+/Pb2+ molar ratio of ca. 1:30000
was maintained at each addition of AgNO3, assuming
that the extraction was complete. The organic phase
(CH2Cl2) was charged with 15 equivalents of 1 versus
silver, in order to perform 15 successive extractions;
thus, the ligand was in excess during all experiments,
except for the last one. The mixture was shaken for 30
seconds, then allowed to equilibrate for 15 minutes.
TLC monitoring (Al2O3, CH2Cl2) showed a regular loss
of 1 to the benefit of the AgNO3 complex. All the
ligand was complexed with the last aliquot of metal.
The aqueous phase was washed with CH2Cl2, and the
combined organic phases were concentrated, treated
with KPF6 then purified by chromatography to give
2-PF6 in ca. 90% yield. The ligand was quantitatively
recycled in CH2Cl2 by treatment with NH4OH.
2. (a) Wieser, C.; Dieleman, D. B.; Matt, D. Coord. Chem.
Rev. 1997, 165, 93; (b) Yordanov, A. T.; Roundhill, D.
M. Coord. Chem. Rev. 1998, 170, 93–124.
3. Rao, P.; Enger, O.; Graf, E.; Hosseini, M. W.; De Cian,
A.; Fischer, J. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2000, 7, 1503–1508.
4. For example: (a) Roundhill, D. M. In Prog. Inorg.
Chem.; K. D. Karlin, Ed.; John Wiley and Sons, 1995;
43, 533–592; (b) Yordanov, A. T.; Falana, O. M.; Koch,
A. F.; Roundhill, D. M. Inorg. Chem. 1997, 36, 6468–
6471; (c) Yordanov, A. T.; Whittlesey, B. R.; Roundhill,
D. M. Inorg. Chem. 1998, 37, 3526–3531.
5. For example: (a) Beer, P. D.; Martin, J. P.; Drew, M. G.
B. Tetrahedron, 1992, 48, 9917–9928; (b) Regnouf-de-
Vains, J.-B.; Lamartine, R. Helv. Chim. Acta 1994, 77,
1817–1825; (c) Regnouf-de-Vains, J.-B.; Lamartine, R.;
Fenet, B.; Bavoux, C.; Thozet, A.; Perrin, M. Helv. Chim.
Acta 1995, 78, 1607–1619; (d) Pellet-Rostaing, S.; Reg-
nouf-de-Vains, J.-B.; Lamartine, R.; Fenet, B. Inorg.
Chem. Commun. 1999, 2, 4–7.
6. Ward, M. D.; Couchman, S. M.; Jeffrey, J. C. Acta
Crystallogr., Sect. C. 1998, 54, 1820–1823.
7. Jaime, C.; de Mendoza, J.; Prados, P.; Nieto, P. M.;
Sanchez, C. J. Org. Chem. 1991, 56, 3372–3376.
Conclusion
8. Aqueous phase: 100 ml H2O; Pb(NO3)2: 60 g (1.8 mol
l−1); AgNO3: 1.0 mg (5.9×10−5 mol l−1); [Ag]/[Pb]: 1/
30500; organic phase: 20 ml of CH2Cl2; initial mass of 1:
105 mg (8.8×10−5 mol)
The binding ability of the new podand 19 towards Ag+
was studied, affording the stable mononuclear complex
2-PF6.10 We suggested that the tetrahedral mode of
binding could be a driving force in the selective extrac-
tion of Ag+ in the presence of Pb2+. The experimental
results showed that the extraction was selective, quanti-
tative and rapid, authorising a continuous process; this
last point, the improvement of silver and ligand recov-
ering processes, as well as competitive extractions of
Ag+ in the presence of other metal cations are currently
under investigation.
9. Compound 1: White powder. Mp: 157°C. IR: 1570 cm−1
(CꢀN), 2960 (CꢀH). UV–vis (CH2Cl2): 290 (31300). 1H
NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): 1.00 (s, 18H, Me3C); 1.18 (s,
18H, Me3C); 2.63 (s, 6 H, Mebpy); 2.93,4.28 (‘q’, AB,
J
AB=12.9, 8H, Ar-CH2-Ar); 4.77 (s, 4H, -OCH2C6H5);
5.20 (s, 4 H, -OCH2bpy); 6.67 (s, 4H, ArH); 6.88 (s, 4H,
2+
ArH); 7.06–7.29 (m, 12H, C6H5 H of bpy); 7.44 (t,
J=7.7, 2H, bpy); 7.57 (t, J=7.7, 2H, bpy); 7.65 (d,
J=6.5, 2H, bpy); 8.00 (d, J=8.1, 2H, bpy); 8.26 (d,
J=7.7, 2H, bpy). 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): 24.66
(Mebpy); 31.35, 31.57 (Me3C); 31.40 (Ar-CH2-Ar); 33.76,
33.89 (Me3C); 77.05, 77.49 (OCH2C6H5, OCH2bpy);
118.33, 119.48, 122.99, 123.47, 124.92, 125.24, 127.51,
127.95, 129.26, 136.91, 137.04 (C(1), C(2), C(3), C(4),
C(5) of C6H5; Cm of Ar; C(3), C(4), C(5), C(3%), C(4%),
C(5%) of bpy); 133.34, 134.30, 138.06, 144.47, 144.58,
152.37, 153.37, 155.21, 155.90, 157.62, 157.88 (C(6) of
C6H5, Co,p,ipso of Ar, C(2), C(2%), C(6), C(6%) of bpy).
ES-MS (pos. mode): 1193.7 ([1+H]+), 1215.7 ([1+Na]+),
597.7 ([1+2 H]2+/2). Anal. calcd for C82H88N4O4
(1193.64): C, 82.51; H, 7.43; N, 4.69; O, 5.36. Found: C,
82.47; H, 7.24; N, 4.77; O, 5.68.
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to the MRES for financial support,
especially J.-O.D. for a Ph.D. fellowship; to SAFAS
(Monaco) and Bruker S.A. for UV spectroscopy and
WinNMR facilities, respectively.
References
1. Guerlet, J.-P.; Pianelli, F., Traite´ de Me´tallurgie, M 2388,
10. Compound 2-PF6: White powder. Mp: 275°C; IR: 1576
Techniques de l’Inge´nieur Ed., Paris, 1992.
.
(C-N), 2955 (CH), 843 (PF6−). UV–vis (CH2Cl2): 291