Organic Letters
Letter
Analysis of the 1H NMR spectra reveals that the addition of
both the smallest LiOTf and the largest CsOTf salts has a
marginal effect on the chemical shifts of both isomers,
suggesting that the binding of the cation is realized outside
the macrocyclic cavity, most likely near azobenzene scaffold
trans and cis isomers exhibit contrasting changes in chemical
shifts of the α-glucose anomeric proton CH(1). Namely, near
1.0 ppm upfield and 0.32 ppm downfield a shift of the CH(1)
hydrogen signal is observed after the addition of 4 equiv of
KOTf to the solutions of trans-1 and cis-1. At the same time,
the aromatic CH resonances of the azobenzene moiety were
shifted downfield by ≤0.55 and ≤0.28 ppm for the trans and cis
isomers respectively, exemplifying the indirect involvement in
cation binding. Among other factors, the shift behavior of the
CH(1) resonance results from (i) the cation-induced
conformational change of the binding pocket, (ii) the
deshielding effect of the cationic guest localized in the
proximity, and (iii) geometry and distance-dependent
through-space effects associated with the ring currents of
benzyl moieties. For the cis isomer, effect (ii) has a decisive
impact on the proton shift, whereas for the trans isomer, effects
Figure 3. Models of the energy-minimized host−guest complexes (a)
[K⊂trans-1]+ and (b) [K⊂cis-1]+, where ⊂ denotes encapsulation.
M−1 for the R and S enantiomers, respectively) and cis-1 (Ka =
38 and 42 M−1 for the R and S enantiomers, respectively)
hosts, plausibly due to their large size and more dispersed
charge of the primary ammonium cation. The discrimination of
the PEA enantiomers by trans-1 (KR/KS = 1.15) and cis-1 (KR/
KS = 1.11) is relatively weak, yet the cis isomer exhibits near 2
times better affinity for (R)-PEA (Kcis/trans = 1.93) and (S)-PEA
(Kcis/trans = 1.97) cations as compared with trans-1. Both trans-1
an cis-1 have a slight preference for the R-PEA enantiomer over
the S-PEA enantiomer, in contrast to other host−guest systems
based on a sucrose scaffold developed in our laboratory.10b,20
Only in one case has the 21-membered host, bearing two
amide groups, shown the complexing ability with a preference
for the R enantiomer of α-PEA.10a Notably, cis-1 exhibits a
different binding mode for PEA as compared with alkali metal
cations; i.e., addition of PEA enantiomers [clearly the effect of
(R)-PEA is stronger than that of (S)-PEA] causes the upfield
shift and metal cations the downfield shift of the signal
corresponding to the anomeric sugar moiety (H1). This might
be attributed to the π−π stacking between the aromatic part of
PEA and benzyl groups of the sugar moiety.
1
(i) and (iii) prevail. On top of that, careful analysis of the H
NMR titration spectra reveals that cis-1 displays a distinct
binding behavior for KOTf versus NaOTf. In particular, the
CHsp2(11) and CHsp2(11′) protons (for numbering, see
Scheme 1) exhibit upfield and downfield shifts upon addition
The plausible explanation is that the larger K+ cation can
coordinate with lone pairs of the NN linkage, whereas the
smaller Na+ interacts with these donor groups to a lesser
extent. Furthermore, a specific through-space interaction
between O-benzyl residues and the azobenzene scaffold
might also be responsible for this effect. As depicted in Figure
S8, a clear dependence of the stability constants (log Ka) for
trans-1 and cis-1 on the alkali cation radius suggests that both
isomers possess cavities of similar sizes. This indicates that the
increased cation affinity of cis-1 presumably results from the
higher number of hydrogen bond interactions and/or a more
effective spatial arrangement of hydrogen bond donor atoms.
To gain better insights into the binding mode of trans-1 and
cis-1 toward alkali metal cations in solution, we performed
DFT calculations using B3LYP-D3 combined with the 6-
31G(d) basis set and C-PCM model (MeCN; ε = 37.5) to
approximate the solvent effects. The energy-minimized
conformations of the complexes of trans-1 and cis-1 with K+
are demonstrated in Figure 3. The results of DFT calculations
are in line with the experimental data showing that cis-1 binds
K+ stronger than trans-1 by 4 kJ mol−1 (see Table S3). For
both isomers, the potassium cation is encapsulated in a three-
dimensional cryptandlike cage by multiple interactions with
the O-donors and lone pairs of the NN bond.
In conclusion, we demonstrated the first example of a
macrocyclic host system in which cation binding properties
could be reversibly controlled by visible light. In contrast to the
photoresponsive macrocyclic systems reported to date, the key
ring closure step was remarkably efficient and cation-
dependent, allowing the preparation of trans-1 in 85.3%
yield, while Cs2CO3 was employed as a dual base and
templating agent. trans-1 is converted into long-lived cis-1 (t1/2
= 25 days) upon irradiation with green light (530 nm), and
reverse isomerization is driven by blue light (410 nm). Both
isomers have a preference for the potassium cation, and cis-1
exhibits higher binding affinity and selectivity for cations than
trans-1, including chiral phenylethylammonium guests (Kcis/
1
Ktrans ≤ 4.1). DFT calculations and H NMR titrations reveal
cis-1 displays a larger number of interactions with potassium
(coordination number of 8) compared to trans-1 (coordination
number 7). In addition, cis-1 exhibits a particularly short K+···
O bond length (d = 2.56 Å) originating from the glucose ring
oxygen atom, which might greatly contribute to stabilization of
the complex.
Furthermore, to elucidate the chiral recognition properties
of geometrical isomers of 1, we also tested triflates of R and S
enantiomers of the 2-phenylethylammonium (PEA) cation.
These chiral guests were bound with considerably lower
affinity than the achiral ones by both trans-1 (Ka = 19 and 22
that, besides the polyether residues, the sucrose ring oxygen
and azobenzene nitrogen atoms markedly contribute to cation
recognition.
ASSOCIATED CONTENT
* Supporting Information
■
sı
The Supporting Information is available free of charge at
Materials and methods, synthetic procedures and full
characterization of new compounds, spectroscopic data,
2690
Org. Lett. 2021, 23, 2687−2692