X. Franck et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 42 (2001) 2801–2803
Table 1. CD3OD H and 13C NMR dataa of 1 (500 MHz),1 and synthetic 12a/13a and 12b/13b (400 MHz)
2803
1
Atom
1
12a/13a (erythro)
12b/13b (threo)
1
− (175.75)
− (175.58)
− (175.78)
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
6.16 [dd, 5.8, 2.0] (122.71)
7.63 [dd, 5.8, 1.4] (157.13)
5.07 [quint., 1.8] (88.22)
3.77 (71.65)
6.18 [dd, 7.0, 2.0] (122.95)
7.72 [dd, 5.8, 1.5] (156.56)
5.01 [td, 4.9, 1.7] (88.37)
3.70 (72.28)
6.16 [dd, 5.8, 2.0] (122.69)
7.63 [dd, 5.8, 1.5] (157.11)
5.07 [quint., 1.8] (88.19)
3.78 (71.73)
1.56b (34.22)
1.56b (34.19)
1.56b (34.19)
1.36b (30.61b)
1.37b (30.59b)
1.36b (30.59b)
1.35b (26.78b)
1.37b (26.75b)
1.36b (26.75b)
1.56b (26.78b)
1.56b (26.75b)
1.56b (26.75b)
10
11
12
1.42 (40.12)
3.70 (68.54)
1.13 [d, 6.2] (23.50)
1.42 (40.09)
3.70 (68.51)
1.13 [d, 6.2] (23.50)
1.42 (40.09)
3.70 (68.51)
1.13 [d, 6.2] (23.50)
a l ppm [mult., J (Hz)] (13C NMR).
b Assignments may be interchanged.
13a,b in around 50% combined yield which were ana-
lyzed by 1H NMR in CDCl3 in the presence of
Eu(hfc)3. It is noteworthy that the pseudo-enantiomers
12a and 13a or 12b and 13b were not separable by usual
chromatography.
Acknowledgements
We thank Professor C. M. Ireland for copies of NMR
data of iso-cladospolide and cladospolide B.
B
M.E.V.A. thanks the University of Vigo for
SOCRATES fellowship.
a
The diastereomeric ratio in experiment B was in favor
of the threo isomers (d.r.=65:35) which showed fur-
thermore a 12b/13b ratio of 85:15, whereas erythro
1
isomers showed a 12a/13a ratio of 75:25 (by H NMR
analysis in CDCl3 in the presence of Eu(hfc)3). How-
ever, in experiment C the threo and erythro isomers
were obtained in a 50:50 ratio. In that case, the threo
isomers showed a 12b/13b ratio of 20:80, whereas ery-
thro isomers showed a 12a/13a ratio of 30:70.
References
1. Cameron, J. S.; Abbanat, D.; Bernan, V. S.; Maiese, W.
M.; Greenstein, M.; Jompa, J.; Tahir, A.; Ireland, C. M.
J. Nat. Prod. 2000, 63, 142–145.
2. (a) Hirota, A.; Sakai, H.; Isogai, A. Agric. Biol. Chem.
1985, 49, 731–735; (b) Fuji, Y.; Fukuda, A.; Hamasaki,
T.; Ichimoto, I.; Nakajima, H. Phytochemistry 1995, 40,
1443–1446.
3. Szlosek, M.; Franck, X.; Figade`re, B.; Cave´, A. J. Org.
Chem. 1998, 63, 5169–5172.
Absolute configurations of the products drawn on Fig.
4, were deduced from comparison of the H chemical
1
shifts in the presence of Eu(hfc)3 with those of related
compounds.10 Then specific rotations were measured in
methanol after isolation by flash chromatographies of
four erythro and threo enriched mixtures: 12amaj, [h]D=
−32 (c 0.66); 13amaj, [h]D=+15 (c 0.55); 12bmaj, [h]D=
+54 (c 0.45); 13bmaj, [h]D=−47 (c 0.75). After calcula-
tions,11 comparison of the specific rotations with those
of natural products (1, [h]D=−90;1 2, [h]D=+452b) did
not unfortunately allow us to determine unambigously
all absolute configurations of stereogenic centers of 1.
However, due to the strong influence of the butenolide
moiety on the specific rotation, we can assume that 1
has the 4S,5S configuration, identical to cladospolide
B 2.
4. Czernecki, S.; Georgoulis, C.; Provelenghiou, C. Tetra-
hedron Lett. 1976, 3535.
5. Yamagushi, M.; Hirao, I. Tetrahedron Lett. 1983, 24,
391–394.
6. Corey, E. J.; Venkateswarlu, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1972,
94, 6190.
7. Heathcock, C. H.; Ratcliffe, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1971,
93, 1746.
8. Hattori, K.; Sajiki, H.; Hirota, K. Tetrahedron Lett.
2000, 41, 5711–5714.
9. Mancuso, A. J.; Swern, D. Synthesis 1981, 165–185.
10. Szlosek, M.; Figade`re, B. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2000,
39, 1799–1801.
11. After calculations: 12a, [h]D=−152; 13a, [h]D=+157; 12b,
[h]D=+99; 13b, [h]D=−105.
12. (a) Dale, J. A.; Mosher, H. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1968,
90, 3732–3738; (b) Trost, B. M.; Belletire, J. L.; Godleski,
S.; McDougal, M. C.; Balkovec, J. M. J. Org. Chem.
1986, 51, 2370–2374; (c) Duret, P.; Waechter, A. I.;
Figade`re, B.; Hocquemiller, R.; Cave´, A. J. Org. Chem.
1998, 63, 4717–4720.
In conclusion, the synthesis of iso-cladospolide B 1 was
performed in seven steps and 13% overall yield. The
NMR data of the synthetic compounds, as well as the
comparison of the specific rotations allow us to propose
the absolute configuration of 1 as follows: 4S,5S and
1
11R, for close analogy with cladospolide B 2. H NMR
analysis of the Mosher esters12 of natural 1 would allow
one to conclude without ambiguity on the absolute
configuration at C-11.