ChemComm
Communication
phenol and the neighboring nitro as well as a relatively long distance
of the intermolecular O–HÁÁÁN make the intermolecular proton
transfer impossible under such limited acidic enhancement by
grinding. In contrast, p-nitro-AM exhibits a desired stress triggered
intermolecular proton transfer property, which can be summarized
as a result of the relatively shorter intermolecular hydrogen bond
length, the absence of intramolecular neighboring O–HÁÁÁN restric-
tion, and an appropriate acidity–basicity matching.
In summary, stress triggered molecular acidulation and
mechanochromism via proton transfer were observed for the
first time in twisted and conjugated amphoteric molecules. Both
experimental data and theoretical calculations support strongly
that external mechanical forces do manipulate molecular acidity
in the solid state. In addition to the acidity–basicity matching,
the hydrogen bonding distance and neighboring restriction also
play an important role in the intermolecular proton transfer.
This newly demonstrated important concept of stress acidula-
tion and promoting proton transfer not only opens a new avenue
for mechanochromic materials, but also inspires and accelerates
further development of stress/pressure sensors, rewritable media
and stress sensitive artificial nervous system, etc.
Fig. 3 Partial view of the crystal packing of AM, p-nitro-AM and o-nitro-AM.
The hydrogen bonds are indicated by the dashed lines (red: oxygen atom, blue:
nitrogen atom, white: hydrogen atom).
The proton transfer is believed to take place in the following
manner. First of all, the electron withdrawing indole moiety enhanced
the acidity of the intramolecular phenolic moiety due to a more planar
conformation under external stress, which provides the possibility for
phenol to give the proton to the nitrogen atom in the indole moiety.
Secondly, the strong multiple intermolecular hydrogen bonds
O–HÁÁÁN [HÁÁÁN = 1.869 Å] (Fig. 3) between the phenol moiety of
one molecule and the indole moiety of another provided the channels
for proton transfer. Finally, the hydrogen bond length in O–HÁÁÁNwas
shortened under external stress and it eventually transformed to
OÀÁÁÁH–N+ simultaneously, resulting in the zwitterionic form.
This work was supported by the National Science Foundation
of China (Grant No. 21072025). The authors also acknowledge Dr
Shubin Zhao for helpful discussion relating to this project.
The neutral-to-zwitterionic transition ratio was dependent on the
pressure (Fig. S9a, ESI‡) and grinding time (Fig. S9b, ESI‡). Take
hand grinding for example, one hour of grinding was enough to
induce maximum transition for 0.04 g of p-nitro-AM. The transition
ratio for this sample was estimated based on N 1s XPS spectra and
in situ fluorescence spectra. The results show that the neutral-to-
zwitterionic transition ratio was approximately 9.3% with hand
grinding (Fig. S10, ESI‡). Although the conversion was less than
10%, it showed a clear colour change from yellow to red (Fig. 1a).
Overall, we clearly proved that stress can enhance molecular
acidity by forcing molecules to be more planar, but the enhancement
is relatively weak with current concept proving molecules. Among
the four amphoteric compounds, only p-nitro-AM exhibits an inter-
molecular proton transfer property upon stress. The primary factor
for the proton transfer is acidity–basicity matching between the
amphoteric functional groups. For di-nitro-AM, two strong electron-
withdrawing nitro groups significantly increase the acidity (pKa =
3.94) of phenolic groups,12 thus resulting in a stable zwitterionic
isomer. Owing to the absence of the electron-withdrawing nitro
group in its acidic moiety, AM has a relatively weak acidity (pKa =
10.59, Fig. S11, ESI‡). This is not strong enough to enable the proton
transfer even under external stress, regardless of numerous inter-
molecular strong hydrogen bonds O–HÁÁÁN [HÁÁÁN = 1.983 Å] as
proton transfer channels (Fig. 3). Comparing o-nitro-AM with p-nitro-
AM, the acidity difference is not remarkable, because the pKa and
pKb of o-nitro-AM and p-nitro-AM are very close (Fig. S12 and S13,
ESI‡). The dihedral angles between the phenolic plane and the
indole plane are also close at 18.51 and 18.11 (Fig. S3, ESI‡),
respectively, which means that the effect of external stress on the
molecular conformation should be similar. The significant differ-
ence lies in hydrogen bonds. In o-nitro-AM, there are two different
hydrogen bonds, one is the intramolecular hydrogen bond O–HÁÁÁN
[HÁÁÁN = 1.946 Å] associated to the hydroxyl and neighboring nitro
group, the other is the intermolecular hydrogen bond O–HÁÁÁN
[HÁÁÁN = 2.430 Å]. The intramolecular O–HÁÁÁN restriction between
Notes and references
1 M. Irie, T. Fukaminato, T. Sasaki, N. Tamai and T. Kawai, Nature,
2002, 420, 759.
2 (a) D. Yan, J. Lu, J. Ma, S. Qin, M. Wei, D. G. Evans and X. Duan,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2011, 50, 7037; (b) Y. Wang, W. Liu, L. Bu,
J. Li, M. Zheng, D. Zhang, M. Sun, Y. Tao, S. Xue and W. Yang,
J. Mater. Chem. C, 2013, 1, 856.
3 (a) H. Ito, T. Saito, N. Oshima, N. Kitamura, S. Ishizaka, Y. Hinatsu,
M. Wakeshima, M. Kato, K. Tsuge and M. Sawamura, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
2008, 130, 10044; (b) G. Shan, H. Li, H. Cao, D. Zhu, P. Li, Z. Su and
Y. Liao, Chem. Commun., 2012, 48, 2000; (c) S. J. Yoon, J. W. Chung,
J. Gierschner, K. S. Kim, M. G. Choi, D. Kim and S. Y. Park, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 2010, 132, 13675; (d) M. S. Kwon, J. Gierschner, S. J. Yoon and
S. Y. Park, Adv. Mater., 2012, 24, 5487; (e) G. Zhang, J. Lu, M. Sabat and
C. L. Fraser, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2010, 132, 2160; ( f ) G. Zhang, J. P. Singer,
S. E. Kooi, R. E. Evans, E. L. Thomas and G. L. Fraser, J. Mater. Chem.,
2011, 21, 8295; (g) Y. Sagara and T. Kato, Nat. Chem., 2009, 1, 605;
(h) J. Wang, J. Mei, R. Hu, J. Z. Sun, A. Qin and B. Z. Tang, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 2012, 134, 9956; (i) X. Zhang, Z. Chi, J. Zhang, H. Li, B. Xu, X. Li,
S. Liu, Y. Zhang and J. Xu, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2011, 115, 7606; ( j) H. Li,
X. Zhang, Z. Chi, B. Xu, W. Zhou, S. Liu, Y. Zhang and J. Xu, Org. Lett.,
2011, 13, 556; (k) Y. Ooyama, Y. Kagawa, H. Fukuoka, G. Ito and
Y. Harima, Eur. J. Org. Chem., 2009, 5321; (l) Y. Ooyama and
Y. Harima, J. Mater. Chem., 2011, 21, 8372; (m) M. Teng, X. Jia,
S. Yang, X. Chen and Y. Wei, Adv. Mater., 2012, 24, 1255.
4 X. Luo, J. Li, C. Li, L. Heng, Q. Dong, Z. Liu, Z. Bo and B. Z. Tang,
Adv. Mater., 2011, 23, 3261.
5 F. Chen, J. Zhang and X. Wan, Chem.–Eur. J., 2012, 18, 4558.
6 D. Wilson and H. Drickamer, J. Chem. Phys., 1975, 63, 3649.
7 X. Zhou, S. Goh, S. Lee and K. Tan, Polymer, 1997, 38, 5333.
8 (a) J. S. Stevens, S. J. Byard, C. A. Muryn and S. L. M. Schroeder,
J. Phys. Chem. B, 2010, 114, 13961; (b) M. Shibata, Y. Kimura and
D. Yaginuma, Polymer, 2004, 45, 7571.
9 J. S. Stevens, S. J. Byard, C. C. Seaton, G. Sadiq, R. J. Davey and
S. L. M. Schroeder, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2011, 50, 9116.
10 J. Fernandez-Bertran, J. C. Alvarez and E. Reguera, Solid State Ionics,
1998, 106, 129.
11 (a) C. Dou, D. Chen, J. Iqbal, Y. Yuan, H. Zhang and Y. Wang,
Langmuir, 2011, 27, 6323; (b) G. Shan, H. Li, D. Zhu, Z. Su and
Y. Liao, J. Mater. Chem., 2012, 22, 12736.
12 R. P. Schwarzenbach, R. Stierli, B. R. Folsom and J. Zeyer, Environ.
Sci. Technol., 1988, 22, 83.
c
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2013
Chem. Commun., 2013, 49, 6587--6589 6589