presence of halogen or carboxy groups as the eventual source of
radicals.12 Several publications have reported that the catalyst is
usually not compatible with sulfide substrates.4,5
Notes and references
1 A. Y. Mohammed and D. L. J. Clive, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun.,
1986, 588.
The starting materials 3b–8b (Scheme 1) for the metathesis–
radical closure sequence were made as follows. Aldehyde 1 was
converted into alcohols 3 (80%), 5 (87%), and 6 (60%)
(Scheme 1) by reaction with vinyllithium, allylmagnesium
bromide, and but-3-enylmagnesium bromide, respectively.
Reaction of 1 with phenyllithium (50%), oxidation, using
pyridine·SO3 in DMSO2 (87%), and treatment of the resulting
ketone with vinyllithium afforded alcohol 7 (85%).
2 Cf. J. R. Parikh and W. von E. Doering, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1967, 89,
5505.
3 Other oxidation methods: (a) R. Baudat and M. Petrzilka, Helv. Chim.
Acta, 1979, 62, 1406; (b) D. H. R. Barton, D. J. Lester, W. B.
Motherwell and M. T. B. Papoula, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun.,
1980, 246; (c) G. H. Posner and M. J. Chapdelaine, Tetrahedron Lett.,
1977, 3227; (d) M. Shimizu, H. Urabe and I. Kuwajima, Tetrahedron
Lett., 1981, 22, 2183; (e) J. Lucchetti and A. Krief, C. R. Acad. Sci., Ser.
C, 1979, 288, 537.
The alcohols 3, 5, 6 and 7 were easily converted into
substrates for ring-closing metathesis by simple ionic reactions.
Acylation of 3 and 5 with acryloyl chloride (Et3N, DMAP,
CH2Cl2) gave 3b (64%) and 5b (71%), respectively (Scheme 1),
and the ethers 4b (65%) and 7b (73%) were made by alkylation
(NaH, THF) of 3 with 2-chloromethyl-3-[(phenylmethyl)-
oxy]prop-1-ene13,14 and of 7 with allyl bromide, respectively.
The metathesis substrate 6b was prepared by oxidation of 6
(87%), again using the pyridine·SO3–DMSO system—which is
an excellent reagent for selective oxidation of phenylseleno
alcohols—and treatment with allylmagnesium bromide
(78%).
4 Sulfides and disulfides have been subjected to ring-closing metathesis,
using a molybdenum catalyst; in some experiments a ruthenium catalyst
[(Cy3P)2Cl2RuNCHCHNCPh2] was unsatisfactory (Ref. 5), as was
(Cy3P)2Cl2RuNCHPh (Ref. 6).
5 E.g. (a) S.-Y. Shon and T. R. Lee, Tetrahedron Lett., 1997, 38, 1283; (b)
S. K. Armstrong and B. A. Christie, Tetrahedron Lett., 1996, 37,
9373.
6 A. G. M. Barrett, M. Ahmed, S. P. Baker, S. P. D. Baugh, D. C.
Braddock, P. A. Procopiou, A. J. P. White and D. J. Williams, J. Org.
Chem., 2000, 65, 3716.
7 For a rare example of ring-closing metathesis of a sulfide, using
(Cy3P)2Cl2RuNCHPh, see: A. G. M. Barrett, S. P. D. Baugh, D. C.
Braddock, K. Flack, V. C. Gibson, M. R. Giles, E. L. Marshall, P. A.
Procopiou, A. J. P. White and D. J. Williams, J. Org. Chem., 2000, 63,
7893.
The bis-allyl selenide 8b was obtained directly from ester 2
by the action of allylmagnesium bromide (78%).
Each of the bis-olefins shown in Scheme 1 underwent ring-
closing metathesis in the presence of (Cy3P)2Cl2RuNCHPh
(8–12 mol%; 22% for 3b), and the products were isolated by
flash chromatography. The reactions were usually run in PhH at
50 °C for 12 h [4b, 6b (65 °C), 7b, 8b (refluxing PhH,15 8 h)],
or in refluxing CH2Cl2 in the presence of Ti(OPr-i)4,16 (42 h,17
3b, 8 h, 5b). In the case of the acrylates (3b, 5b), Ti(OPr-i)4
must be added to complex the ester carbonyl and prevent
unproductive complexation of carbenoid intermediates.18
The radical cyclization step (see Scheme 2), leading to 3d,
4d,e, 5d–8d, was carried out under standard conditions by
syringe pump addition (over ca. 10 h) of a PhH solution of
Bu3SnH (1.4–2.2 equiv., 0.01–0.08 M) and AIBN (0.2–0.4
equiv., 0.006–0.03 M) to a refluxing solution (0.01–0.02 M) of
the substrate (1 equiv.) in the same solvent. In the case of 6c we
isolated only the product of 6-exo cyclization, and not the
isomeric alcohol resulting from 7-exo closure.19
8 For an extensive table of functional group-catalyst compatibility, see:
S. K. Armstrong, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1, 1998, 371.
9 (a) D. L. J. Clive and R. J. Bergstra, J. Org. Chem., 1990, 55, 1786; (b)
C. Bigogno, B. Danieli, G. Lesma and D. Passarella, Heterocycles,
1995, 41, 973.
10 K. Hiroi, J. Abe, K. Suya, S. Sato and T. Koyama, J. Org. Chem., 1994,
59, 203.
11 For one of several recent reviews, see: R. H. Grubbs and S. Chang,
Tetrahedron, 1998, 54, 4413.
12 For synthesis of bridgehead bicyclic sultams by tandem ring-closing
metathesis–radical cyclization (in which the radical is derived from a
halomethylsulfonyl group), see: L. A. Paquette and S. M. Leit, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 1999, 121, 8126.
13 T. Konosu, Y. Furukawa, T. Hata and S. Oida, Chem. Pharm. Bull.,
1991, 39, 2813.
14 In the alkylation with this reagent, NaI was added to generate the iodide
in situ.
15 Reaction was very slow in refluxing CH2Cl2. Cf. A. Fürstner, O. R.
Thiel, L. Ackermann, H.-J. Schanz and S. P. Nolan, J. Org. Chem.,
2000, 65, 2204.
The above experiments establish that the PhSe group, which
serves as a very convenient radical source, can be introduced at
an early stage in synthetic routes that involve ionic reactions and
that end with sequential application of two powerful bond-
forming processes, ring-closing metathesis and radical cycli-
zation.
16 A solution of the substrate was refluxed in the presence of Ti(OPr-i)4
before adding the Grubbs catalyst.
17 A fresh portion of catalyst was added after 30 h.
18 (a) A. Fürstner and K. Langemann, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1997, 119, 9130;
(b) A. K. Gosh, J. Cappiello and D. Shin, Tetrahedron Lett., 1998, 39,
4651.
All new compounds were characterized spectroscopically,
including high resolution mass measurements.
19 Cf. A. L. J. Beckwith, Tetrahedron, 1981, 37, 3073.
Acknowledgment is made to the Natural Sciences and
Engineering Research Council of Canada and to Merck Frosst
for financial support.
606
Chem. Commun., 2001, 605–606