5674
A. Sidduri et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 20 (2010) 5673–5676
R2
I
cyclopentyl analog 10. A similar modification in the saturated ser-
ies led to a complete loss of activity.8 In our experience, the ready
accommodation of the R2 region of larger and homologated cyclo-
alkyl groups is unique to this olefinic class of GK activators.
In order to investigate the stereochemical preference of these
olefins and the impact of further subsitution, we prepared the Z-
isomer and tetra-substituted derivatives. The Z-regioisomer 15 is
ꢀ20-fold less potent than the corresponding E-regioisomer 10
and the tetra-substituted olefin 16 was inactive (Fig. 2), possibly
due to conformational effects leading to inhibition of essential
hydrogen bonding between N–H and the protein.13
a, b, c, d
e, f
R2
X
O
O
4
3
R2
R2
H
O
g, h
N
R3
O
O
R
Further improvement in potency was achieved by optimizing
the heteroaromatic ring (R3) and the R- and R1-substituents on
the benzene ring while maintaining the cyclopentyl ring at R2
(Table 2). The SAR at the R3 region in the current series follows very
similar trends to the saturated series. Several smaller substituents
such as bromide, chloride, methyl, and cyano were acceptable at
the 5-position of the thiazol-2-yl ring. Of these, the chloro 17
and bromo 18 derivatives gave a >5-fold improvement in potency.
Other heterocycles such as pyridin-2-yl were also tolerated (21 vs
22), but with a small reduction in potency. Replacement of thiazol-
2-yl ring with an open chain N-methylacetamide resulted a nine-
fold less potent compound (25 vs 26) which is in parallel with re-
sults obtained in the saturated series.8
Also consistent with our experience with the saturated ana-
logues,8 the benzene ring accommodates a variety of electron
withdrawing groups at the 3- and 4-positions. Some of the 3,4-
disubstituted analogues were somewhat more potent than the 4-
monosubstituted compound 10. The methanesulfonyl moiety at
the 4-position can be substituted by a 5-methyl tetrazol-1-yl group
(22 vs 27) without loss of potency. On the other hand, substitution
with chloride reduced activity fivefold (22 vs 24).
R
R1
R1
5
2
Scheme 1. Reagents and conditions: (a) X = I, Zn dust, 1,2-dibromoethane, TMSCl,
THF, rt, 2–5 h, or X = Br, Mg turnings, THF, rt, 4–5 h; (b) CuCNÁ2LiCl, THF, À70 °C to
À10 °C, 10 min; (c) methyl propiolate, THF, À70 °C to À30 °C, 3 h; (d) I2, THF, À70 °C
to rt, 1 h; (e) Zn dust, 1,2-dibromoethane, TMSCl, THF, rt, 3–4 h; (f) substituted
bromobenzene or iodobenzene, Pd(dba)2, PPh3, THF, 40–45 °C, 15 h; (g) 1.0 N aq
NaOH, EtOH, 40 °C, 4–5 h; (h) NBS, PPh3, CH2Cl2, 0 °C, 1.5 h, and then 2-amino-R3,
0 °C to rt, 15 h.
X
X
Y
a, b
N
H2N
N
N
R1
R1
N
6
7
R1 = F or Cl
X = Br or I
Y = CH3 or CF3
Scheme 2. Reagents and conditions: (a) Acetic anhydride or trifluoroacetic
anhydride, THF, 0 °C to rt, 15 h; (b) NaN3, acetonitrile, CH2Cl2, trifluoromethane-
sulfonic anhydride, 0 °C to rt, 15 h.
Combination of the optimal substituents at each position R, R1,
R2, and R3 led to the very potent analogues described in Table 3.
Several GK activators incorporating cyclopentylmethyl, cyclohexyl,
and cycloheptyl moieties had SC1.5 values in the single digit (31
and 35) to low double digit nanomolar range (29, 32, 36 and 37).
The positive impact of addition of strongly electron withdrawing
trifluoromethyl- (28–31) and nitro- (32) groups at the R1 position
of the aromatic ring are consistent with parallel observations in
saturated series.14 We also note that the replacement of a 5-methyl
by a 5-trifluoromethyl group on the tetrazol-1-yl ring caused a
fourfold reduction in potency (33 vs 34).
glucose-6-phosphate to NADH which is measured spectrophoto-
metrically. Concentration response curves were constructed and
the concentration of drug molecule causing a 50% increase (SC1.5
)
in GK activity, relative to baseline, was calculated.
As anticipated from our experience with the saturated deriva-
tives,8 a significant improvement in potency was observed through
the replacement of the lower alkyl moieties at R2 with cycloalkyl
groups (Table 1). Interestingly, the cyclopentyl analog was twofold
more potent than that of the corresponding saturated compound
(1 vs 10). In contrast to the SAR of the saturated derivatives, the
cyclohexyl 11 and cycloheptyl 12 were more potent than the
cyclopentyl derivative 10. As a further surprise, the homologated
cyclopentylmethyl analog 14 retained equivalent activity to the
H
N
H
N
N
N
O
S
O
S
S
S
Table 1
O
O
O
O
SAR summary of R2 modifications
1
10
R2
SC 1.5 = 0.127 µM
SC 1.5 = 0.06 µM
H
N
N
O
S
CH3
S
H
N
O
O
H
N
N
N
Compd
R2
SC1.5 (lM)
O
S
8
9
Ethyl
1.2
0.45
0.06
0.029
0.021
0.073
0.053
O
S
S
S
Isopropyl
Cyclopentyl
Cyclohexyl
Cycloheptyl
Cyclooctyl
O
O
O
O
10
11
12
13
14
16
15
SC 1.5 = Inactive
SC 1.5 = 1.18 µM
Cyclopentylmethyl
Figure 2. Comparison of E-, Z- and tetra-substituted olefins.