are not distinguishable because their mass spectra are very
similar in the C(5) (demethylation fragmentation) and C(4)
regions (deethylation fragmentation).12 Furthermore, the dif-
ferent isotopic species of 2,2-dimethylbutane can not be quan-
tiÐed because of the absence of the parent peak group; this is
why they have not been reported in Table 1.
\ 3.4 and (iii) the relative amount of
\ 28.9%.
(c) With 3-methylpentane(3-13C) we note that the relative
contribution of the self isomerization is equal to 35.7%.
Moreover, we have, with the two 2-methylpentanes, almost
the same relative contributions for chain lengthening, n-
hexane formation, for chain shortening, 2,3-dimethylbutane
formation and for 3-methylpentane formation, which are in
the ratio 40 : 7 and 53%. Starting from 3-methylpentane, we
have 16, 5 and 78% for n-hexane, 2,3-dimethylbutane and 2-
methylpentane formation, respectively.
3.1. On WC
(Ov700)4 h
Isomerization of the three labelled methylpentanes, 2-
methylpentane(2-13C),
2-methylpentane(4-13C)
and
3-
methylpentane(3-13C) has been performed on this catalyst
sample.
3.1.1. Isomerization of 2-methylpentane(4-13C). Isomer-
ization of 2-methylpentane (4-13C) mainly leads to di†erent
isotopic species of 3-methylpentane and n-hexane, with a 3-
methylpentane/n-hexane ratio of about 1. As already shown,6
this value of 1 is characteristic of a metallic behavior of the
catalyst sample. The most abundant labelled species are those
obtained from self-isomerization, i.e., 2-methylpentane(2-13C)
(33.5%). Isomerization into 3-methylpentane(2-13C) and n-
hexane(2-13C) represents 24.0 and 20.1%, respectively.
With the same intermediate species, via only bond shifts,
from both 2-methylpentanes (2-13C) and (4-13C), we should
obtain the same isomer distributions, and this is in fact the
case:
Let us see if these adsorbed intermediates implying r-alkyl
adsorbed species and mainly methyl, ethyl and propyl shifts
are consistent with the di†erent isotopic distributions
observed here. Starting from 2-methylpentane(4-13C), Scheme
1b shows the di†erent methyl shifts issued from r-alkyl inter-
mediates. It must be noted that the possibilities of methyl and
ethyl shifts leading to 2,3-dimethylbutane and 2,2-dimethyl-
butane are not represented because their isomers are formed
in a small amount. Scheme 1b clearly explains the important
amounts of 3-methylpentane(2-13C) and n-hexane (2-13C). At
this stage, if a propyl shift in chain lengthening takes place, it
is impossible to detect it due to the position of the 13C at C(2)
or C(5).
Starting from 2-methylpentane(2-13C), methyl and propyl
shifts explain well the formation of 28.9% 3-methylpentane(2-
13C), and of 16.1% n-hexane(2-13C) plus 7.9% n-hexane(3-
13C) (Schemes 2a and b). The propyl shift may also exist when
starting from 2-methylpentane(4-13C) but it will not bring any
isotopomer other than n-hexane(2-13C), already obtained via
methyl shifts (Scheme 1b).
Concerning isomerization of 3-methylpentane(3-13C), the
di†erent methyl and ethyl shifts (except for the formation of
2,2- and 2,3-dimethylbutanes) are shown in Scheme 3 and
account for the same amount in the formation of 33.9% 2-
methylpentane(3-13C) and 32.8% 3-methylpentane(2-13C).
Nevertheless, starting from 2-methylpentane(4-13C), the
most abundant isotopic species observed, the 2-
methylpentane(2-13C) cannot be formed directly from a simple
methyl or ethyl shift. The same observation applies when it
comes to the formation of 20% 2-methylpentane(4-13C) start-
ing from 2-methylpentane(2-13C). However, it could also be
supposed that, whatever the starting molecule is, 3-
methylpentane(2-13C) is a common adsorbed intermediate,
which isomerizes by methyl shift giving large amounts of 2-
methylpentane(2-13C) and 2-methylpentane(4-13C), respec-
tively from 2-methylpentane(4-13C) and 2-methylpentane(2-
13C), as shown in Scheme 4a.
3.1.2. Isomerization of 2-methylpentane(2-13C). As in isom-
erization of 2-methylpentane(4-13C), the value of the ratio
between 3-methylpentane and n-hexane is around 1. The most
important species are 3-methylpentane(2-13C) (28.9%), self-
isomer (2-methylpentane(4-13C) (20.0%)) and n-hexane(2-13C)
(16.1%).
3.1.3. Isomerization of 3-methylpentane(3-13C). Isomer-
ization of 3-methylpentane(3-13C) mainly leads to 2-
methylpentane(2-13C) (33.9%), to self isomerization (3-
methylpentane(2-13C) (32.8%)), and to 2-methylpentane(4-13C)
(12.7%).
Several points have to be emphasized: (i) branched isomers
with lower carbon number on the main chain are formed; (ii)
self isomerization is an important process on such catalysts
and its relative contribution is more or less similar whatever
the starting molecules; and (iii) no oleÐns are formed, and the
relative contribution of the cracking is low. Taking into
account such remarks, we can start to explain these results,
keeping in mind that the reactions are performed under a
large excess of hydrogen.
3.1.4. InterpretationÈmechanisms. As we have already
described for the catalyst sample treated by O at high tem-
2
perature, WC
,10 the isomer distribution can be
(Ov700)4 h
explained by a metallic behavior using r-alkyl adsorbed inter-
mediates. These r-alkyl adsorbed species were put forward by
Rooney et al.14 to explain the isomerization of neopentane on
noble metals without any cracking process. This mechanism
involves three-center orbitals with simultaneous p-bonding to
the metal (Scheme 1a) and accounts for the increase of methyl
shift relative to alkyl shift by increasing the chain length of the
reacting hydrocarbon.
Can such species explain the following results obtained?
(a) With 2-methylpentane(4-13C) we observe that: (i) the
relative contribution of self-isomerization is equal to 34.0%;
(ii) the value of the ratio between
Following on in the same way, isomerization of 3-
methylpentane(2-13C) by ethyl shift can explain the presence
of n-hexane(2-13C) and 3-methylpentane(3-13C) in the isomer
species distribution (Scheme 4b). The formation of these
species is of course less favored because methyl shift is pre-
dominant over ethyl shift. This point can also be explained by
the presence of steric hindrance which decreases ethyl shift
processes. It can also be added that the intermediate species
are probably not very electron deÐcient which explains the
importance of methyl shift compared to ethyl or to other alkyl
shifts.
is equal to 3.3 and (iii) the relative amount of
is equal to 24.0%.
(b) With 2-methylpentane(2-13C), observations similar to
the above mentioned ones can be made: (i) the relative contri-
bution of the self isomerization is equal to 28.5%; (ii) the value
of the ratio
Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2000, 2, 2893È2902
2895