Communications
[10] E. L. Eliel, L. Clawson, D. E. Knox, J. Org. Chem. 1985, 50,
2707 – 2711.
[11] CCDC162432 (16) contains the supplementary crystallographic
data for this paper. These data can be obtained free of charge
from The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre via
an equilibrium is soon established between the O6- and O4-
coordinated complexes, which leads to another zwitterionic
species 38. The silane agent can approach the intermediate 38
at the well-exposed O6-benzyl cation from either side to
generate equal amounts of diastereomers.
In conclusion, we have successfully developed Cu(OTf)2
as an excellent dual-purpose catalyst for highly regioselective
reductive ring opening of various benzylidene acetals with
BH3 and Me2EtSiH to furnish the corresponding primary and
secondary alcohols, respectively. The reaction conditions are
mild, and various protecting groups in the substrates are
tolerated. The isotope studies provide the first experimental
evidence that neither O6- nor O4-cleavage of the benzylidene
ring proceeds through the SN2 reaction pathway when borane
or triethylsilane attacks the acetal carbon center.
[12] R. Madiyalakan, M. S. Chowdhary, S. S. Rana, K. L. Matta,
Carbohydr. Res. 1986, 152, 183 – 194.
Received: October 1, 2004
Published online: January 31, 2005
Keywords: carbohydrates · copper · homogeneous catalysis ·
.
Lewis acids · regioselectivity
[1] a) Preparative Carbohydrate Chemistry (Ed.: S. Hanessian),
Marcel Dekker, New York, 1997; b) T. W. Greene, P. G. M.
Wuts, Protective Groups in Organic Synthesis, 3rd ed., Wiley,
New York, 1999, pp. 217 – 224.
[2] a) A. Liptꢀk, I. Jodꢀl, P. Nꢀnꢀsi, Carbohydr. Res. 1975, 44, 1 – 11;
b) P. Fꢁgedi, A. Liptꢀk, P. Nꢀnꢀsi, Carbohydr. Res. 1982, 104, 55 –
67.
[3] T. Mikami, H. Asano, O. Mitsunobu, Chem. Lett. 1987, 2033 –
2036.
[4] a) M. Ek, P. J. Garegg, H. Hultberg, S. Oscarson, J. Carbohydr.
Chem. 1983, 2, 305 – 311; b) Y. Guindon, Y. Girard, S. Ber-
thiaume, V. Gorys, R. Lemieux, C. Yoakim, Can. J. Chem. 1990,
68, 897 – 902; c) M. Oikawa, W.-C. Liu, Y. Nakai, S. Koshida, K.
Fukase, S. Kusumoto, Synlett 1996, 1179 – 1180; d) L. Jiang, T.-H.
Chan, Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 355 – 358; e) S. Chandrasekhar,
Y. R. Reddy, C. R. Reddy, Chem. Lett. 1998, 1273 – 1274; f) M.
Sakagami, H. Hamana, Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 5547 – 5551.
[5] a) P. J. Garegg, H. Hultberg, Carbohydr. Res. 1981, 93, C10-C11;
b) P. J. Garegg, H. Hultberg, S. Wallin, Carbohydr. Res. 1982,
108, 97 – 101; c) M. P. DeNinno, J. B. Etienne, K. C. Duplantier,
Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 36, 669 – 672; d) N.-L. Pohl, L. L.
Kiessling, Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 6985 – 6988; e) S. D.
Debenham, E. J. Toone, Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2000, 11,
385 – 387; f) B.-Z. Zheng, M. Yamauchi, H. Dei, S. Kusaka, K.
Matsui, O. Yonemitsu, Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 6441 – 6445.
[6] C.-C. Wang, S.-Y. Luo, C.-R. Shie, S.-C. Hung, Org. Lett. 2002, 4,
847 – 849.
[7] The structures of all the products were assigned unambiguously
through NMR spectroscopic analysis. First, a 1H–13C COSY
experiment was performed to mark the anomeric carbon and the
doublet anomeric proton. A 1H–1H COSY experiment then
established the correlation between all of the ring protons
starting from H1. The regioselectivity was confirmed by observ-
ing the correlation between the OH and H6/H4 protons. This
general protocol was followed throughout the study (see the
Supporting Information).
[8] O. J. Plante, S. L. Buchwald, P. H. Seeberger, J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2000, 122, 7148 – 7149.
[9] V. K. Srivastava, C. Schuerch, J. Org. Chem. 1981, 46, 1121 –
1126.
1668
ꢀ 2005 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 1665 –1668