10.1002/anie.201708630
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
COMMUNICATION
using a fluorescence-based liposome assay and the same type
of liposome/lipid compositions.[12] With only 17 mmol L-1 m-
carboxy luminol entrapped in the liposomes vs. 150 mmol L-1
sulforhodamine B in the case of the fluorescent liposomes,[12] the
lower limit of detection afforded by the ECL liposomes is
therefore more than significant with a total enhancement factor
of almost 1500.
Acknowledgements
We are deeply indebted to Andrei Georgescu (CAD liposome
model), Vanessa Tomanek and Joachim Rewitzer (ICP-OES),
Florian Olbrich and the SensorikApplikationsZentrum at OTH
Regensburg (design and fabrication of 3D-printed ECL cells),
and the machine shop of the Faculty of Chemistry at the UR
(construction of the xyz stage) for their excellent technical
support. M.N. is a doctoral fellow of the Fond der Chemischen
Industrie (FCI).
Table 2. Comparison of matrix effects through real samples on 100 pmol L-1
Sample
Signal recovery[a]
100 ± 5
Intensity integrals[b]
0.42 ± 0.02
Keywords: luminol • ECL • liposomes • biosensors •
luminescence
Reference
River water
Soil extract
Bovine serum
105 ± 23
0.44 ± 0.09
[1]
[2]
N. E. Tokel, A. J. Bard, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1972, 94, 2862-2863.
a) L. Hu, G. Xu, Chem. Soc. Rev. 2010, 39, 3275-3304; b) L. Lu, J. Li, T.
Kang, S. Cheng, Talanta 2015, 138, 273-278.
119 ± 13
0.50 ± 0.05
95 ± 3
0.40 ± 0.01
[3]
a) S. Carrara, F. Arcudi, M. Prato, L. De Cola, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.
2017, 56, 4757-4761; Angew. Chem. 2017, 129, 4835; b) Y. Chen, S.
Zhou, L. Li, J.-j. Zhu, Nano Today 2017, 12, 98-115; c) J. Tan, L. Xu, T.
Li, B. Su, J. Wu, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 9822-9826; Angew.
Chem. 2014, 126, 9980-9984.
[a] given in % ± standard deviations in %, [b] given in a.u. ± standard
deviations.
[4]
[5]
N. Harvey, J. Phys. Chem. 1928, 33, 1456-1459.
a) Q. Jin, M. Li, B. Polat, S. K. Paidi, A. Dai, A. Zhang, J. V. Pagaduan,
I. Barman, D. H. Gracias, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 3822-3826;
Angew. Chem. 2017, 129, 3880; b) Y. Du, A. Pothukuchy, J. D. Gollihar,
A. Nourani, B. Li, A. D. Ellington, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 992-
996; Angew. Chem. 2017, 129, 1012; c) H. Shintaku, J. W. Palko, G. M.
Sanders, J. G. Santiago, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 13813-
13816; Angew. Chem. 2014, 126, 14033-14036.
Furthermore, the minimal matrix effects that were observed
upon spiking 100 pmol L-1 DNA sequences into various complex
matrices demonstrate the strength of the background-free ECL
assay principle (table 2). In summary, we synthesized and
characterized the new m-carboxy luminol 2 and demonstrated its
outstanding performance in bioassays.[19] Due to its high
solubility under physiological conditions, its low oxidation
potential, its high ECL yield, and the presence of a bioorthogonal
functional group, 2 is highly attractive for a variety of analytical
applications from which the parent luminol 1 is precluded. For
example, ECL can be easily miniaturized into microfluidic
systems.[20] Thus, one takes advantage of the absence of
scattered excitation light, its low inherent background, the highly
localized signal generation and minimized instrumental
hardware. These are all advantages especially in comparison to
miniaturized fluorescence detection. Therefore, the successful
combination of m-carboxy luminol with liposomes reported here
is a promising signal amplification tool for point-of-care and in-
field detection for DNA or RNA sequences. Further approaches
for bioassays can take advantage of the covalent coupling
capabilities through the carboxylate group. m-Carboxy luminol
enables studies under physiological conditions and provides
efficient signal enhancement and thus bears the potential to
replace luminol and [Ru(bpy)3]2+ in most of their bioanalytical
[6]
B. S. Pattni, V. V. Chupin, V. P. Torchilin, Chem. Rev. 2015, 115,
10938-10966.
[7]
[8]
K. A. Edwards, A. J. Baeumner, Talanta 2006, 68, 1421-1431.
a) A. G. Griesbeck, Y. Díaz-Miara, R. Fichtler, A. Jacobi von Wangelin,
R. Pérez-Ruiz, D. Sampedro, Chem. Eur. J. 2015, 21, 9975-9979; b) R.
Pérez-Ruiz, R. Fichtler, Y. Diaz Miara, M. Nicoul, D. Schaniel, H.
Neumann, M. Beller, D. Blunk, A. G. Griesbeck, A. Jacobi von Wangelin,
J. Fluoresc. 2010, 20, 657-664.
[9]
See supplementary information, chapter 3.1
[10] M. A. Ribi, C. C. Wei, E. H. White, Tetrahedron 1972, 28, 481-492.
[11] R. Wilson, H. Akhavan-Tafti, R. DeSilva, A. P. Schaap, Electroanalysis
2001, 13, 1083-1092.
[12] K. A. Edwards, A. J. Baeumner, Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2006, 386, 1613-
1623.
[13] a) F. Nakonechny, M. A. Firer, Y. Nitzan, M. Nisnevitch, Photochem.
Photobiol. 2010, 86, 1350-1355; b) P. Rakthong, A. Intaramat, K.
Ratanabanangkoon, Anal. Sci. 2010, 26, 767-772.
applications.
This
opens
up
new
possibilities
in
chemiluminescence-based cellular imaging, in vivo detection of
biomarkers such as ROS, highly sensitive point-of-care sensing
and microarray technologies.
[14] See supplementary information, chapter 3.5
[15] a) K. A. Edwards, K. L. Curtis, J. L. Sailor, A. J. Baeumner, Anal.
Bioanal. Chem. 2008, 391, 1689-1702; b) J. T. Connelly, S. R. Nugen,
W. Borejsza-Wysocki, R. A. Durst, R. A. Montagna, A. J. Baeumner,
Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2008, 391, 487-495; c) M. B. Esch, L. E. Locascio,
M. J. Tarlov, R. A. Durst, Anal. Chem. 2001, 73, 2952-2958.
[16] See supplementary information, chapter 3.7
[17] See supplementary information, chapter 3.6
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.