690
Russ.Chem.Bull., Int.Ed., Vol. 50, No. 4, April, 2001
Fokin et al.
Table 2. Data from IR and 1H and 19F NMR spectroscopy of compounds 3, 4a,b, 5a,b, 6a,b, and 710
1
Com-
pound
IR, ν/cm
NMR spectrum,
(DMSO-d6, δ, J/Hz)
1H
19F
3
2700, 1605 (NH);
3.84 (s, 3 H, OCH3);
7.887.03 (m, 8 H, 2 C6H4);
12.76 (br.s, 1 H, NH)
3.84 (s, 3 H, OCH3);
7.827.05 (m, 8 H, 2 C6H4)
19.08 (m, 2 F); 15.58 (m, 1 F);
1.70 (m, 1 F)
1670 (C=O amide); 1630 (C=O);
1500, 1480 (C=C, Ñ=N)
1740 (C=O lactone); 1635 (C=O);
1595, 1550, 1500, 1480
4a
19.33 (m, 2 F); 16.05 (m, 1 F);
2.55 (m, 1 F)
(Ñ=N, C=C)
4b
5a
1740 (C=O lactone);
7.407.93 (m, 9 H, C6H4, C6H5)
2.72 (m, 1 F); 16.26 (m, 1 F);
19.20 (m, 1 F); 20.16 (m, 1 F)
0.41 (m, 1 F); 11.7312.96
(m, 2 F); 18.4819.03 (m, 1 F)
1650, 1640 (C=O, C=N)
3320, 2780, 2720 (NH);
3040 (CH); 1670 (C=O amide);
1635 (C=O); 1610 (C=N)
3290, 3060, 2760, 2700 (NH);
3045 (CH); 1675 (C=O amide);
1640 (C=O); 1595 (C=N)
2.29 (s, 1 H, CH3);
7.207.83 (m, 8 H, 2 C6H4,);
8.09 (s, 1 H, CH); 12.43 (s, NH)
1.121.19 (m, 4 H, 2 CH2);
3.834.16 (m, 1 H, CH);
7.117.83 (m, 4 H, C6H4);
8.26 (s, 1 H, CH);
5b
0.66 (m, 1 F); 11.33 (m, 1 F);
16.47 (m, 1 F); 18.38 (m, 1 F)
12.41 (br.s, 1 H, NH)
6a
6b
7
3055 (CH); 1765 (C=O lactone);
1645 (C=O); 1610 (C=N);
1590, 1580, 1520, 1510, 1500,
1490 (C=C)
3040 (CH); 1765 (C=O lactone);
1640 (C=O); 1600 (C=C)
2,19 (s, 3 H,CH3);
7.407.84 (m, 8 H, 4 Ñ6H4);
8.08 (s, 1 H, CH)
0.41 (m, 1 F); 11.7312.96
(m, 2 F); 18.4819.03 (m, 1 F)
1.131.30 (m, 4 H, 2 CH2);
3.744.20 (m, 1 H, CH);
7.417.89 (m, 4 H, C6H4);
8.30 (s, 1 H, CH)
1.12 (t, 3 H, OCH2CH3,
J = 7.0); 3.83 (s, 3 H, OCH3);
5.38 (br.s, 2 H, NH2);
4.14 (q, 2 H, OCH2CH3,
J = 7.0); 6.437.53
0.18 (m, 1 F); 12.01 (m, 1 F);
17.07 (m, 1 F); 18.57 (m, 1 F)
3450, 3350 (NH); 1730 (COOEt);
1620 (C=O); 1570, 1500, 1480
(C=N, C=C)
16.33 (dd, 1 F, F(5));
25.67 (d, 1 F, F(6));
53.78 (d, 1 F, F(8));
J5,8 = J8,5 = 17.2;
J5,6 = J6,5 = 21.5;
(m, 13 H, 3 C6H4, SH)
1.11, 1.13 (both t, 3 H,
OCH2CH3, J = 7.1);
1.88, 1.96 (both s, 3 H, CH3);
4.10, 4.12 (both q, 2 H,
OCH2CH3, J = 7.1);
5.28 (br.s, 2 H, NH2);
6.407.41 (m, 12 H, 3 C6H4,);
7.34 (br.s, 1 H, SH);
J6,8 = J8,6 = 0
16.73, 17.02 (both dd, 1 F, F(5));
24.63, 24.66 (both d, 1 F, F(6));
8*
3450, 3340 (NH); 3050 (CH);
1740 (C(=O)OEt); 1630 (C=O);
1610, 1580 (C=N, C=C)
46.18, 46.47 (both d, 1 F, F(8));
J5,8 = J8,5 = 17.1;
J5,6 = J6,5 = 22.0;
J6,8 = J8,6 = 0
7.72, 7.74 (both s, 1 H, CH)
3.84 (s, 3 H, CH3);
5.37 (m, 2 H, NH2);
9
3450 (NH); 1640 (C(=O)S);
1610 (C=O); 1500, 1490, 1470
(C=N, C=C)
17.97 (dd, 1 F, F(5));
28.36 (d, 1 F, F(6));
54.58 (d, 1 F, F(8));
J5,8 = J8,5 =17.2;
6.508.17 (m, 5 H, C6H5)
J5,6 = J6,5 = 20.1;
J6,8 = J8,6 = 0
10
3240, 1600 (NH); 1680 (CO2Et);
1640, 1630, 1620 (C=O, C=N);
15201490 (C=C arom.)
1.23 (t, 3 H, OCH2CH3,
J = 7.1); 3.89 (s, 3 H, OCH3);
4.32 (q, 2 H, OCH2CH3,
J = 7.1); 7.047.69
20.24 (m, 2 F); 15.11 (m, 1 F);
0.76 (m, 1 F)
(m, 9 H, C6H4, C6H5);
12.32 (br.s, 1 H, NH)
* The compound was present as two isomeric forms.
o-aminophenol afforded the corresponding heterocyclic
ensembles, viz., quinoxalonylcinnolone (3), cinnolonyl-
benzooxazinones (4a,b), quinolonylquinoxalones (5a,b),
and quinolonylbenzooxazinones (6a,b) (Scheme 1,
Tables 1 and 2).
It is of note that the reactions of cinnolones 1 with
aromatic dinucleophiles proceed more readily than those
of quinolones 2. Apparently, this is due to the fact that
the former are more electron-deficient compounds. Thus,
the reactions with quinolones 2 require a substantial