Notes and references
‡ All reactions and manipulations were carried out using standard Schlenk
techniques or in a dry-box under a nitrogen atmosphere. Complexes 1a and
1b were synthesized according to published procedures.12 A representative
synthesis of 2: to a green pentane solution of freshly generated 1b (1.07 g,
2.18 mmol) was added an excess of pyridine (0.51 g, 6.54 mmol). Upon
addition of pyridine, 2 precipitated from solution and was isolated by
filtration in 90% yield.
Synthesis of 3: a toluene solution of 2 (0.200 g, 0.336 mmol) was heated
to 90 °C in a sealed ampoule for 2 h. Concentration of the reaction mixture
under reduced pressure afforded 3 as a black solid in 92% yield.
§ Crystal data: for 2: C28H37MoN5Si2, M = 595.75, a = 15.5947(8), b =
10.3170(5), c = 18.4572(9) Å, V = 2969.6 Å3, orthorhombic, space group
Pna21, Z = 4, m(Mo-Ka) = 0.547 mm21, T = 173(2) K, final R1 =
0.0218, wR2 = 0.0517, GOF (on F2) = 0.994.
For 3: C41H59Mo2N7Si4·2CH2Cl2, M = 1124.04, a = 14.4655(8), b =
23.572(1), c
= 15.9891(9) Å, b = 104.390(1)°, V =
5280.8(5) Å3,
monoclinic, space group P21/n, Z = 4, m(Mo-Ka) = 0.805 mm21, T =
173(2) K, final R1 = 0.0384, wR2 = 0.0824, GOF (on F2) = 0.994.
The structures were solved by direct methods in SHELXTL5,13 and
refined using full-matrix least squares. The non-H atoms were treated
anisotropically, whereas the hydrogen atoms were calculated in ideal
positions and were riding on their respective carbon atoms. The asymmetric
unit of 3 consists of the complex and two dichloromethane molecules, one
of which is disordered and refined in three parts. Their site occupation
factors were dependently refined until the final cycle of refinement after
which they were fixed at 0.50, 0.35 and 0.15, respectively.
Fig. 2 Molecular structure of 3 (50% probability thermal ellipsoids). The
solvating dichloromethane molecules have been omitted for clarity.
Selected bond lengths (Å) and angles (°): Mo(1)–Mo(2) 2.5669(4), Mo(1)–
C(34) 2.179(3), Mo(2)–N(7) 2.047(2), Mo(2)–N(6) 1.745(2), Mo(2)–N(5)
2.285(3); Mo(1)–N(1)–Mo(2) 80.74(9), Mo(1)–N(2)–Mo(2) 81.48(9).
b101894i/ for crystallographic data in CIF or other electronic format.
1 CX (X = N, O) multiple bond cleavage reactions are more common.
See: K. A. Hall and J. M. Mayer, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1992, 114, 10 402;
F.-M. Su, J. C. Bryan, S. Jang and J. M. Mayer, Polyhedron, 1989, 8,
1261; R. L. Miller, P. T. Wolczanski and A. L. Rheingold, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 1993, 115, 10 422; K. E. Meyer, P. J. Walsh and R. G. Bergman,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1995, 117, 974; R. R. Schrock, M. L. Listemann and
L. G. Sturgeoff, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1982, 104, 4291.
2 G. Proulx and R. G. Bergman, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1994, 116, 7953;
L. M. Atagi, D. E. Over, D. R. McAlister and J. M. Mayer, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 1991, 113, 870; C. C. Cummins, R. R. Schrock and W. M. Davis,
Inorg. Chem., 1994, 33, 1448.
3 F. A. Cotton, J. H. Matonic, C. A. Murillo and X. Wang, Bull. Soc.
Chim. Fr., 1996, 133, 711; F. A. Cotton, L. M. Daniels, C. A. Murillo
and X. Wang, Inorg. Chem., 1997, 36, 896; J. R. Agadorn and J. Arnold,
Organometallics, 1994, 13, 4670.
4 J. B. Bonanno, T. P. Henry, D. R. Neithamer, P. T. Wolczanski and E. B.
Lobkovski, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1996, 118, 5132.
5 T. S. Kleckley, J. L. Bennet, P. T. Wolczanski and E. B. Lobkowski,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1997, 119, 247; S. D. Gray, K. J. Weller, M. A.
Bruck, P. M. Briggs and D. E. Wigley, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1995, 117,
10 678.
6 M. Tayebani, S. Gambarotta and G. P. A. Yap, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.,
1998, 37, 3002; M. Tayebani, S. Gambarotta and G. P. A. Yap,
Organometallics, 1998, 17, 3639; M. Tayebani, K. Feghali, S.
Gambarotta and C. Bensimon, Organometallics, 1997, 16, 5084.
7 M. H. Chisholm, K. Folting, J. C. Huffman, J. Leonelli, N. S. Marchant,
C. A. Smith and C. E. Taylor, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1985, 107, 3722.
8 See electronic supplementary information (ESI†).
9 A. Galindo, A. Ienco and C. Mealli, New J. Chem., 2000, 2, 73.
10 S. Wang, K. A. Abboud and J. M. Boncella, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1997,
119, 11 990.
11 R. D. Adams, D. M. Collins and F. A. Cotton, Inorg. Chem., 1974, 13,
1086; R. J. Klingler, W. Butler and M. D. Curtis, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
1975, 97, 3535.
basal plane of the molecule resulting in steric congestion
between the Py and SiMe3 groups which causes the hindered
rotation of the Py ligands.
Monomeric 2 is stable at room temperature under an inert
atmosphere for extended periods of time. However, when
heated to 90 °C in toluene, 2 converts cleanly to the bimetallic
compound 3 (Scheme 1) in > 90% yield over the course of 2 h.‡
This air-sensitive, diamagnetic compound is stable in solution
for extended periods of time at 90 °C.
A single crystal of 3 was grown from a pentane–dichloro-
methane solution at 230 °C. Compound 3 crystallizes with two
molecules of dichloromethane. An X-ray diffraction study
shows that 3 contains two Mo atoms bridged by two phenyl
imido groups as well as a Me3SiNC6H4 ligand (Fig. 2).§ This
unusual Me3SiNC6H4 group is apparently formed by cleavage
of one NSiMe3 group from an o-(Me3SiN)2C6H4 ligand. The
NSiMe3 group that was cleaved remains as an additional
terminal imido ligand on one of the Mo atoms. The formal
oxidation state at each metal center is best described as Mo( ).
V
The Mo(1)–Mo(2) distance of 2.5669(4) Å, although short for a
Mo–Mo single bond, indicates the existence of a metal–metal
bond, and accounts for the observed diamagnetism of 3.11 Four
upfield resonances, assigned to the four inequivalent Me3Si
groups, are observed in the 1H NMR spectrum of 3 and this is
consistent with the structure as determined by X-ray crys-
tallography.
The unusual C–N bond cleavage reaction that is observed
during the pyrolysis of 2 is presumably driven by the formation
of the Mo–N triple bond and demonstrates the reactivity of the
Mo(IV) moiety towards oxidation. Further reactivity studies of 2
and 3 are currently in progress.
12 T. M. Cameron, C. G. Ortiz, I. Ghiviriga, K. A. Abboud and J. M.
Boncella, Organometallics, 2001, 20, 2032; we have reported the
synthesis of 1b previously, T. M. Cameron, C. G. Ortiz, K. A. Abboud,
J. M. Boncella, R. T. Baker and B. L. Scott, Chem. Commun., 2000,
573.
We thank the National Science foundation (CHE 9523279)
for funding of this work. K. A. A. thanks the NSF and the
University of Florida for funding X-ray equipment
purchases.
13 SHELXTL/NT Version 5.10, Bruker Analytical X-ray Instruments,
Inc., Madison, WI, 53719, 1997.
Chem. Commun., 2001, 1224–1225
1225