COMMUNICATIONS
naphthylene derivative 8. Although the high-resolution mass
spectrum and UV/Vis absorption spectrum supported the
assignment of macrocyclic structure 10, a species soluble
enough for more thorough characterization was still required.
A more aggressive solubilization strategy was utilized in the
preparation of 14 (Scheme 3). Beginning with quinone 11,
treatment with a Grignard reagent followed by reductive
lations, the central carbon atoms of the two butadiyne units
(C14 C1) are indeed splayed outward, separated by a
distance of 3.23 . Even with this distortion, the butadiyne
units are nearly linear, with the most extreme variation from
linearity a mere 78. As expected, the annulene backbone is
planar to within 0.05 .
We have demonstrated that with proper functionalization,
the preparation of stable naphthalene diacetylene macro-
cycles is possible. The distance between butadiyne units in
these systems has been found to be less important to stability
than conjugation. We are currently exploring the incorpora-
tion of these stabilized macrocycles into new carbon ladder
polymers based on 2.
Received: February 23, 2001 [Z16670]
[1] a) H. Meier, Synthesis 1972, 235; b) M. Nakagawa, Pure Appl. Chem.
1975, 44, 885; c) N. Huang, F. Sondheimer, Acc. Chem. Res. 1982, 15,
96; d) S. Akiyama, Anal. Sci. 1994, 10, 365; e) R. R. Tykwinski, F.
Diederich, Liebigs Ann. 1997, 649; f) W. J. Youngs, C. A. Tessier, J. D.
Bradshaw, Chem. Rev. 1999, 99, 3153; g) M. M. Haley, J. J. Pak, S. C.
Brand, Top. Curr. Chem. 1999, 201, 81.
[2] For example donor± acceptor substituted dehydroannulenes: J. J. Pak,
T. J. R. Weakley, M. M. Haley, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121,
8182.
Scheme 3. Synthesis of 14. Reagents and conditions: a) 1. iPr3SiCCMgBr;
2. AcOH/SnCl2, 80%; b) Me3SiCCSnBu3, [(Ph3P)2PdCl2], 60%;
c) 1. K2CO3 in MeOH/THF; 2. CuCl/TMEDA in acetone, 88%.
[3] K. P. Baldwin, A. J. Matzger, D. A. Scheiman, C. A. Tessier, K. P. C.
Vollhardt, W. J. Youngs, Synlett 1995, 1215.
[4] a) O. M. Behr, G. Eglinton, A. R. Galbraith, R. A. Raphael, J. Chem.
Soc. 1960, 3614; b) U. H. F. Bunz, V. Enkelmann, Chem. Eur. J. 1999,
5, 263.
deoxygenation led to the very soluble enediyne 12.[13]
Alkynylation by Stille coupling[14] led to tetrayne 13, which
was selectively desilylated and oxidatively coupled to yield a
deep red solution of macrocycle 14. This soluble material
shows remarkable thermal and photochemical stability. So-
lutions of 14 were heated at >1908C for several hours, or left
in direct sunlight for a period of several weeks, without
noticeable decomposition. Examination of the 1H NMR
spectrum shows a slight paratropic shift of all of the aromatic
protons of the macrocycle with respect to the acyclic starting
material. The FTIR, 13C NMR, and mass spectral analyses all
support the structural assignment of 14.
[5] R. H. Mitchell, F. Sondheimer, Tetrahedron 1968, 24, 1397.
[6] a) K. Miyawaki, R. Suzuki, T. Kawano, I. Ueda, Tetrahedron Lett.
1997, 38, 3943; b) K. Miyawaki, T. Kawano, I. Ueda, Tetrahedron Lett.
2000, 41, 1447.
[7] a) R. Gleiter, R. Merger, J. Chavez, T. Oeser, H. Irngartinger, H.
Pritzkow, B. Nuber, Eur. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 2841; b) F. Sondheimer,
Y. Amid, R. Wolovsky, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1957, 79, 6263.
[8] Distances reported in this paper were calculated by using ab initio HF
methods in Mac Spartan Plus (version 1.1.9): Wavefunction, Inc.,
18401 Von Karman Ave., Ste. 370, Irvine, CA 92612.
[9] a) K. C. Nicolaou, W.-M. Dai, Angew. Chem. 1991, 103, 1453; Angew.
Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1991, 30, 1387; b) R. G. Bergman, Acc. Chem.
Res. 1973, 6, 25.
Slow evaporation of a 1,2-dichloroethane solution of
compound 14 led to dark purple crystals with a golden
metallic luster. The structure was determined by X-ray
crystallographic analysis (Figure 2).[15] Consistent with calcu-
Â
Â
[10] J. J. Gonzalez, A. Francesch, D. J. Cardenas, A. M. Echavarren, J. Org.
Chem. 1998, 63, 2854.
[11] A. J. Matzger, K. P. C. Vollhardt, Tetrahedron Lett.
1998, 39, 6791, and references therein.
[12] L. T. Scott, P.-C. Cheng, M. M. Hashemi, M. S.
Bratcher, D. T. Meyer, H. B. Warren, J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1997, 119, 10963.
[13] W. Baidossi, H. Schumann, J. Blum, Tetrahedron 1996,
52, 8349.
[14] J. K. Stille, Angew. Chem. 1986, 98, 504; Angew.
Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1986, 25, 508.
[15] Data for the X-ray structure analysis: Crystals from
1,2-dichloroethane, C76H92Si4 (Mr 1117.86); crystal
size 0.26 Â 0.20 Â 0.08 mm3; monoclinic, space group
I2/a, a 21.717(3), b 13.8940(10), c 22.961(2) ,
b 101.235(10)8, Z 4, V 6795.4(12) 3, 1calcd
1.093 gcm 3, T 173(1) K, 2q 50, 11692 reflections
measured, 5980 were unique (Rint 0.0372), and 4831
were observed (I > 2s(I)), MoKa radiation (l
0.71073 ), graphite monochromated, data were
corrected for Lorentz and polarization effects. The
structure was solved by direct methods and refined
with the full-matrix, least-squares method; R1
0.0561, wR2 0.1080 (for 4831 reflections with
Figure 2. Molecular structure of 14 (ORTEP plot) in the crystal. Selected bond lengths []
and angles [8]: C1'-C14 1.371(3), C14-C13 1.201(3), C13-C12 1.430(3), C12-C15 1.441(3), C15-
C3 1.439(3), C3-C2 1.428(3), C2-C1 1.202(3), C1-C14' 1.371(3), C12-C11 1.389(3), C11-C10
1.407(3), C10-C9 1.370(3), C9-C8 1.474(3), C8-C7 1.379(3), C7-C6 1.472(3), C6-C5 1.369(3),
C5-C4 1.402, C4-C3 1.398(3), C15-C16 1.394(3), C9-C16 1.411(3), C16-C6 1.413(3); C1'-C14-
C13 173.6(2), C14-C13-C12 176.3(2), C13-C12-C15 121.34(19), C12-C15-C3 129.65(18), C15-
C3-C2 123.26(19), C3-C2-C1 178.0(2), C2-C1-C14' 172.7(2).
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2001, 40, No. 13
ꢀ WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH, D-69451 Weinheim, 2001
1433-7851/01/4013-2511 $ 17.50+.50/0
2511