742
L. Lengyel et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 53 (2012) 738–743
Table 2
Thermal cyclization products
Entry Product
Procedure
to 9d–h
Reaction conditions
Yield
(%)
Conditions of reference reactions
N
N
T = 300 °C, P = 160 bar, loop = 4.5 mL,
flow = 3 mL/min, c = 0.1 M, tresidence = 1.5 min
1
B1
B1
89
60
In diphenyl ether, 10 min, 260 °C27
O
10d
N
T = 300 °C, P = 100 bar, loop = 4.5 mL,
flow = 3 mL/min, c = 0.05 M, tresidence = 1.5 min
2
In diphenyl ether, 250 °C28
OH
10e
N
T = 360–370 °C, P = 100 bar, loop = 1.5 mL,
flow = 1.5 mL/min, c = 0.05 M,
tresidence = 1.0 min
3
B1
62
Not reported
F
OH
10f
N
T = 350–360 °C, P = 130 bar, loop = 1.5 mL,
flow = 2 mL/min, c = 0.05 M,
tresidence = 0.75 min
(a) 5 min, 300 °C , microwave irradiation;29 (b) In biphenyl,
diphenyl ether, 1 h, 250 °C;30 (c) 1.25 h, 200–600 °C , 0.02 Torr31
4
5
B1
B1
43
60
NC
OH
N
10g
T = 300 °C, P = 100 bar, loop = 4.5 mL,
flow = 3 mL/min, c = 0.05 M, tresidence = 1.5 min
Oxo form: (a) in diphenyl ether, 0.25 h, heating (71%);18 (b) 0.83 h,
O
170–600 °C , 0.02 Torr;31 enol form: in iphenyl ether, 260 °C.32
OH
10h
Procedure B: To an ethanolic solution containing amine (2 g)
either Meldrum’s acid (1.1 equiv) and triethylorthoformate
(1.1 equiv) (Procedure B1)17,18 or cyanoacetic acid ethyl ester
(1.1 equiv) and triethylorthoformate (1.1 equiv) (Procedure B2)19
were added and the resulting solution refluxed for 2 h. After cool-
ing the crude product crystallized. The crystals were filtered,
washed with ethanol, and dried. Yield: 55–65% (Procedure B1),
45% (Procedure B2) (if necessary the compounds were purified by
column chromatography).
(0.45–4.5 min). This novel procedure leading to biphenyl deriva-
tives opens new avenues for the synthesis of these important inter-
mediates. We replaced the high boiling point solvent (diphenyl
ether) with a low boiling point solvent (THF) under high pressure.
The advantage of the continuous flow procedure in a common low
boiling point solvent is that it allows easy work-up, supports auto-
mation and the process is suitable for process development and
scale-up. Since the low boiling point solvent can be readily recy-
cled (thus, reduces waste), this procedure can be considered as a
greener alternative of presently available processes.
Procedure C:20 is a typical Knoevenagel protocol: To a stirred
solution of the corresponding aldehyde (1 equiv) in dry dichloro-
methane, diethyl malonate (1.1 equiv), piperidine (0.1 equiv), ace-
tic acid (0.1 equiv), and 4 Å molecular sieves were added. The
reaction mixture was stirred for 30 min at rt, another portion of
molecular sieves was added, and stirring was continued for 2 h.
The reaction mixture was filtered, the solvent removed on a rotary
evaporator at 25 °C and the resulting slurry diluted with diethyl
ether (30 mL). The solution was extracted with water. The com-
bined organic layers were washed with water, 1 N hydrochloric
acid, saturated sodium bicarbonate solution, water, and brine,
and finally dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate. Filtration and re-
moval of the solvent resulted in the crude Knoevenagel adduct
which was purified by column chromatography. Yield: 50–60%.
Procedure D:21 For the Conrad-Limpach precursor imine, aniline
(5 g) was dissolved in ethanol (20 mL), then ethyl acetoacetate
(1 equiv), glacial acetic acid (0.02 equiv), and MgSO4 (7 g) were
added. The resulting mixture was refluxed overnight. After cooling
to rt and filtering, the filtrate was evaporated to dryness and puri-
fied by column chromatography. Yield: 52%
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to Dr. Georg Frater for his continuing advice and
scientific support. We also thank Dr. Viktor Gyóllai for his contri-
bution during the preparation of this manuscript. This work was
partially supported by the National Development Agency KMOP
1.1.4 Grant (#KMOP-1.1.4-09-2010-0145).
Supplementary data
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in
References and notes
1. Curran, T. T. In Named Reactions in Heterocyclic Chemistry; Li, J.-J., Corey, E. J.,
Eds.; Wiley Interscience: New York, 2005; pp 423–436.
2. Lipson, V. V.; Gorobets, N. Y. Mol. Diversity 2009, 13, 399–419.
3. Gaber, A. E. M.; McNab, H. Synthesis 2001, 2059–2073.
4. Cablewski, T.; Gurr, P. A.; Pajalic, P. J.; Strauss, C. R. Green Chem. 2000, 2, 25–28.
5. Smith, R. B.; Faki, H.; Leslie, R. Synth. Commun. 2011, 41, 1492–1499.
6. Morgentin, R.; Pasquet, G.; Boutron, P.; Jung, F.; Lamorlette, M.; Maudet, M.;
Plé, P. Tetrahedron 2008, 64, 2772–2782.
7. Darvas, F.; Dormán, G.; Lengyel, L.; Kovács, I.; Jones, R.; Ürge, L. Chim. Oggi 2009,
27, 40–43.
In conclusion, we have successfully carried out thermal ring-
closing reactions (Gould–Jacobs type and Conrad–Limpach) to pro-
duce pyridopyrimidinones, hydroxyquinolines and, for the first
time, aromatic naphthol and phenol derivatives in good to high
yields in a continuous flow system with very short residence times
8. Razzaq, T.; Glasnov, T. N.; Kappe, C. O. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 1321–1325.