182
R. V. Stick et al.
(R)-2,3-Dibenzyloxypropyl 5-Bromo-5-deoxy-2,3-O-isopropylidene-β-
D-riboside (5)
The β-D-riboside (5) was prepared following the procedure of Irgolic,[4]
with the exceptions that camphorsulfonic acid was used in preference
to p-toluenesulfonic acid, and the reaction was subjected to usual
workup (EtOAc). Flash chromatography (EtOAc/petrol, 8 : 92) gave (5)
1
as a colourless oil (43%), [α]D –52.7° (lit.[4] –53.2°). H NMR (200
MHz, CDCl3) δ 1.37, 1.55, 2 × s, CMe2; 3.22–3.97, m, 7H, H 5,
aglycon; 4.37–4.43, m, H 4; 4.56–4.79, m, 6H, H 2,3,CH2Ph; 5.15, s,
H 1; 7.37, 10H, Ph.
(R)-2,3-Dibenzyloxypropyl 5-Chloro-5-deoxy-2,3-O-isopropylidene-β-
D-riboside (7)
Camphorsulfonic acid (170 mg) was added to a mixture of methyl
5-chloro-5-deoxy-2,3-O-isopropylidene-β-D-riboside (190 mg, 0.85
mmol) and the dibenzylglycerol (4) (230 mg, 0.85 mmol), and the
mixture was stirred at 80°C and 25 torr (20 h). Usual workup (EtOAc)
and flash chromatography (EtOAc/petrol, 3 : 22) yielded the chloride
(7) as a colourless oil (150 mg, 40%), [α]D –55.3° (Found: C, 64.9; H,
type reductive elimination[6,7] of the bromide (5) (Scheme 2).
The use of the chloride (7) did little to improve matters and
we accepted the reasonable yield of the arsine (6).
Any attempt to remove the benzyl protecting groups from
(6) by hydrogenolysis failed, probably owing to poisoning of
the palladium catalyst by the arsine residue in the substrate.
Nevertheless, treatment of (6) with sodium in liquid
ammonia gave the diol (8).
1
6.7%. C25H31ClO6 requires C, 64.9; H, 6.8%). H NMR (300 MHz,
CDCl3) δ 1.39, 1.53, 2 × s, CMe2; 3.41–3.60, m, 5H, aglycon; 3.70–
3.82, m, 2H, AB part of ABX pattern, H 5; 4.31–4.38, m, H 4; 4.56–
4.75, m, 6H, H 2,3,CH2Ph; 5.11, s, H 1; 7.27–7.42, 10H, Ph. 13C NMR
(75.5 MHz, CDCl3) δ 24.9, 26.4, CMe2; 44.2, C 5; 67.3, 69.7, 2C,
aglycon CH2; 72.3, 73.5, 2C, CH2Ph; 76.7, aglycon CH; 82.2, 85.1,
86.7, C 2,3,4; 108.4, C 1; 112.6, CMe2; 127.7, 127.8, 128.4, 138.1,
138.4, Ph.
An attractive conclusion now was to treat the diol (8) with
iodine in methanol, thereby removing the isopropylidene
group[8] and converting the arsine, after hydrolytic workup,
into the arsine oxide.[9] Although the desired natural product
(1) was formed, there was apparently some leakage to the
methyl D-ribofuranoside (9). Therefore, the diol (8) was
easily oxidized to the arsine oxide (10) and a subsequent and
careful treatment with aqueous trifluoroacetic acid gave the
natural product (1).[3]
(R)-2,3-Dibenzyloxypropyl 5-Deoxy-5-dimethylarsino-2,3-O-isopro-
pylidene-β-D-riboside (6)
(i) Iododimethylarsine (370 mg, 1.6 mmol) was added to sodium
(75 mg, 3.0 mmol) in dry THF (7 mL) with stirring under argon.[3]
After the addition, the yellow mixture was stirred (30 min, 20°C) and
then allowed to stand under argon (1 h). The supernatant liquid was
added to the bromide (5) (200 mg, 0.4 mmol) and the mixture was
stirred (1 h). The reaction was quenched (H2O) and, after usual workup
(EtOAc) and flash chromatography (EtOAc/petrol/triethylamine,
6 : 93 : 1), the arsine (6) was obtained as a colourless oil (87 mg, 41%),
[α]D –24.8° (Found: C, 61.0; H, 7.1%. C27H37AsO6 requires C, 60.9; H,
Experimental
1
7.0%). H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ 0.98, 0.99, 2 × s, AsMe2; 1.38,
1.47, 2 × s, CMe2; 1.59–1.89, m, 2H, AB part of ABX pattern, H 5;
3.51–3.98, m, 5H, aglycon; 4.28–4.33, m, H 4; 4.51–4.78, m, 6H, H 2,3,
CH2Ph; 5.09, s, H 1; 7.33–7.39, m, 10H, Ph. 13C NMR (75.5 MHz,
CDCl3) δ 9.17, 9.23, AsMe2; 25.0, 26.5, CMe2; 34.7, C 5; 67.2, 70.3,
2C, aglycon CH2; 72.2, 73.4, 2C, CH2Ph; 76.9, aglycon CH; 85.0, 85.7,
85.8, C 2,3,4; 108.8, C 1; 112.2, CMe2; 127.6, 127.7, 128.3, 128.4,
138.2, 138.5, Ph.
(ii) Iododimethylarsine (250 mg, 1.1 mmol) and sodium (51 mg,
2.2 mmol) in dry THF (5 mL) were used, as described above, to react
with the chloride (7) (125 mg, 0.3 mmol), and the mixture was stirred
(3 h). The reaction was quenched (H2O) and, after usual workup
(EtOAc) and flash chromatography (EtOAc/petrol, 1 : 10), the arsine (6)
was obtained as a colourless oil (70 mg, 49%). The 1H NMR (300 MHz)
spectrum for the compound was in good agreement with that obtained
from the bromide (5).
Experimental details have been given previously.[10]
Methyl 2,3-O-Isopropylidene-5-O-p-toluenesulfonyl-β-D-riboside (2)
The tosylate (2) was prepared following a two-step procedure as
described by Lerner,[5] with the exception that the reaction was
quenched with saturated NaHCO3, not water as reported, to give (2) as
colourless crystals (40%), [α]D –49.6° (lit.[11] –50.0°), m.p. 81–82°C
(EtOH: lit.[5] 83–84°C).
Methyl 5-Bromo-5-deoxy-2,3-O-isopropylidene-β-D-riboside (3)
A mixture of the tosylate (2) (8.7 g, 24 mmol) and tetrabutyl-
ammonium bromide (23 g, 72 mmol) in DMF was heated under reflux
(24 h). Concentration of the mixture and usual workup (Et2O) gave a
pale yellow oil. Rapid suction-filtration chromatography (EtOAc/
petrol, 17 : 83) yielded the bromide (3) as a colourless oil (5.6 g, 89%),
[α]D –79° (lit.[4] –79.6°). 1H NMR (200 MHz, CDCl3) δ 1.31, 1.48, 2 ×
s, CMe2; 3.25–3.42, m, 2H, H 5; 3.32, s, OCH3; 4.25–4.35, m, H 4;
4.53–4.58, m, H 3; 4.65–4.70, m, H 2; 4.99, s, H 1.
In both the above preparations of the arsine (6), the presence of the
alcohol (4) in the crude reaction mixture was obvious (TLC).
(R)-2,3-Dihydroxypropyl 5-Deoxy-5-dimethylarsino-2,3-O-isopropyl-
idene-β-D-riboside (8)
Methyl 5-Chloro-5-deoxy-2,3-O-isopropylidene-β-D-riboside
Sodium (115 mg, 5.0 mmol) was added to a solution of the arsine
(6) (370 mg, 0.70 mmol) in THF and liquid ammonia (11 mL, 3 : 8) at
–78°C. The mixture was left (1 h) and then quenched with solid NH4Cl.
The ammonia was left to evaporate and, after the usual workup
(CH2Cl2) and flash chromatography (EtOAc/petrol, 1 : 1), the diol (8)
was obtained as a yellow oil (172 mg, 71%), [α]D –20.1° (Found: C,
44.2; H, 7.2%. C13H25AsO6 requires C, 44.1; H, 7.0%). 1H NMR (300
MHz, CDCl3) δ 0.98, 0.99, 2 × s, AsMe2; 1.38, 1.47, 2 × s, CMe2; 1.55–
1.89, m, 2H, AB part of an ABX pattern, H 5; 3.03, 2H, OH; 3.50–3.91,
A mixture of the tosylate (2) (7.3 g, 20 mmol) and tetrabutylammonium
chloride (16 g, 59 mmol) in DMF was heated at reflux (36 h).
Concentration of the mixture and usual workup (Et2O) gave a pale
yellow oil. Rapid-suction filtration column chromatography (EtOAc/
petrol, 17 : 83) yielded the title chloride as a pale yellow oil (3.1 g,
1
71%), [α]D –92° (lit.[12] –93°). H NMR (200 MHz, CDCl3) δ 1.28,
1.43, 2 × s, CMe2; 3.29, s, OCH3; 3.38–3.59, m, 2H, H 5; 4.25–4.29, m,
H 4; 4.55, d, J2,3 6.2 Hz, H 3; 4.64, d, H 2; 4.99, s, H 1.