5624 Inorganic Chemistry, Vol. 40, No. 22, 2001
Balakrishna et al.
lock. Positive shifts lie downfield of the standard in all of the cases.
Infrared spectra were recorded on a Nicolet Impact 400 FTIR instrument
in Nujol mull. Microanalyses were performed on a Carlo Erba model
1106 elemental analyzer. Melting points were recorded in capillary tubes
and are uncorrected.
in CH2Cl2 (8 mL) was added dropwise to a solution of [RuCl2(PPh3)3]
(0.048 g, 0.05 mmol) also in CH2Cl2 (8 mL). The reaction mixture
was stirred for 6 h at 25 °C, and then the solvent was removed under
reduced pressure to yield a pale yellow residue. Free PPh3 was removed
by extraction with several aliquots of Et2O to give an analytically pure,
yellow crystalline product of 5. Yield: 93% (0.07 g). Mp: 230 °C
(dec). Anal. Calcd for C68H90Cl6N2O4P4RuS2: C, 54.39; H, 6.04; N,
1.86. Found: C, 54.60; H, 6.07; N, 1.80. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3):
δ 7.32 (d, 2H, Ar), 7.08-7.18 (m, 5H, N-phenyl), 7.03 (d, 2H, Ar),
1.03 (s, 18H, tert-butyl), 1.18 (s, 18H, tert-butyl). 31P{1H} NMR
(121.421 MHz, CDCl3): δ 122.7(s).
Synthesis of [PdCl2{η2-PhN(PCl)2{(-OC6H2(tBu)2)(µ-S)((tBu)2-
C6H2O-)}-KP,KP}] (6). A CH2Cl2 (5 mL) solution of the ligand 1
(0.18 g, 0.27 mmol) was added dropwise to a solution of [Pd(COD)-
Cl2] (0.076 g, 0.27 mmol) also in CH2Cl2 (5 mL) at 25 °C. The reaction
mixture was stirred for 6 h to give a clear orange-yellow solution which
was concentrated to 3 mL and diluted with 1 mL of hexane. After the
solution was left to stand at room temperature, 6 formed as an
analytically pure, yellow crystalline product. Yield: 76% (0.17 g).
Mp: 140-142 °C. Anal. Calcd for C34H45Cl4NO2P2PdS: C, 48.50; H,
5.39; N, 1.66. Found: C, 48.32; H, 5.24; N, 1.59. 1H NMR (300 MHz,
CDCl3): δ 7.32 (d, 2H, Ar), 7.12-7.25 (m, 5H, N-phenyl), 7.08 (d,
2H, Ar), 1.05 (s, 18H, tert-butyl), 1.23 (s, 18H, tert-butyl). 31P{1H}
NMR (121.421 MHz, CDCl3): δ 74.5 (s).
Synthesis of PhN(PCl)2{(-OC6H2(tBu)2)(µ-S)((tBu)2C6H2O-)}
(1). A mixture of 2,2′-thiobis(4,6-di-tert-butylphenol) (6.9 g, 15.6 mmol)
and triethylamine (3.24 g, 32 mmol) in Et2O (150 mL) was added
dropwise to a suspension of bis(dichlorophosphino)aniline (4.6 g, 15.6
mmol) also in Et2O (100 mL) with vigorous stirring at 0 °C. The mixture
was stirred for 18 h at 25 °C. Triethylamine hydrochloride was removed
by filtration, and the solvent was removed under reduced pressure to
give a white crystalline product of 1 which was recrystallized from a
mixture of hexane/dichloromethane (1:1). Yield: 89% (9.24 g). Mp:
183 °C (dec). Anal. Calcd for C34H45Cl2NO2P2S: C, 61.52; H, 6.83;
N, 2.11. Found: C, 61.48; H, 6.78; N, 2.09. 1H NMR (300 MHz,
CDCl3): δ 7.35 (d, 2H, Ar), 7.11-7.21 (m, 5H, N-phenyl), 7.05(d,
2H, Ar), 1.13 (s, 18H, tert-butyl), 1.21 (s, 18H, tert-butyl). 31P{1H}
NMR (121.421 MHz, CDCl3): δ 145.7 (s). HRMS calcd for C34H45-
Cl2NO2P2S (M+), 663.2023; found, 663.1998.
Synthesis of PhN(PF)2{(-OC6H2(tBu)2)(µ-S)((tBu)2C6H2O-)} (2).
A mixture of 1 (2 g, 3.0 mmol) and SbF3 (1.34 g, 7.5 mmol) was heated
to reflux in n-heptane (100 mL) for 3 h. It was then cooled to room
temperature, filtered, and the filtrate was concentrated to 40 mL under
reduced pressure. Cooling this solution to 0 °C gave 2 as an analytically
pure, white crystalline solid. Yield: 84% (1.6 g). Mp: 180 °C (dec).
Anal. Calcd for C34H45F2NO2P2S: C, 64.63; H, 7.18; N, 2.21. Found:
Synthesis of [PtCl2{η2-PhN(PCl)2{(-OC6H2(tBu)2)(µ-S)((tBu)2-
C6H2O-)}-KP,KP}] (7). A CH2Cl2 (5 mL) solution of the ligand 1
(0.14 g, 0.21 mmol) was added dropwise to a solution of [Pt(COD)-
Cl2] (0.078 g, 0.21 mmol) also in CH2Cl2 (5 mL) at 25 °C. The reaction
mixture was stirred for 7 h to give a clear pale yellow solution. The
solution was concentrated to 3 mL, diluted with 1 mL of n-hexane,
and cooled to 0 °C whereupon an analytically pure sample of 7
precipitated out. Yield: 72% (0.14 g). Mp: 150-152 °C. Anal. Calcd
for C34H45Cl4NO2P2PtS: C, 43.90; H, 4.88; N, 1.50. Found: C, 43.80;
1
C, 64.54; H, 7.15; N, 2.19. H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.41 (d,
2H, Ar), 7.15-7.25 (m, 5H, N-phenyl), 7.11 (d, 2H, Ar), 1.15 (s, 18H,
tert-butyl), 1.22 (s, 18H, tert-butyl). 31P{1H} NMR (121.421 MHz,
1
CDCl3): δ 134.7 (m), | JPF
+
3JPF| ) 1153 Hz. HRMS calcd for
C34H45F2NO2P2S (M+), 631.2614; found, 631.2591.
Synthesis of [Mo(CO)3{η3-PhN(PCl)2{(-OC6H2(tBu)2)(µ-S)-
((tBu)2C6H2O-)}-KP,KP,KS}] (3). A petroleum ether (8 mL) solution
of [Mo(CO)4NBD] (0.087 g, 0.29 mmol) was added to a suspension
of 1 (0.193 g, 0.29 mmol) also in petroleum ether (10 mL). The mixture
was heated to 55 °C for 1.5 h to get a clear yellow solution which was
allowed to come to room temperature and then filtered. The filtrate
was concentrated to 5 mL and was cooled to -20 °C to give 3 as
analytically pure, yellowish-green crystals. Yield: 73% (0.18 g). Mp:
160 °C (dec). Anal. Calcd for C37H45Cl2MoNO5P2S: C, 52.62; H, 5.37;
N, 1.65. Found: C, 52.56; H, 5.33; N, 1.59. IR (Nujol, νCO, cm-1):
1
H, 4.81; N, 1.45. H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.29 (d, 2H, Ar),
7.07-7.18 (m, 5H, N-phenyl), 7.03 (d, 2H, Ar), 1.01 (s, 18H, tert-
butyl), 1.23 (s, 18H, tert-butyl). 31P {1H} NMR (121.421 MHz,
1
CDCl3): δ 46.7(s), JPtP ) 4544 Hz.
X-ray Crystallography. Crystals of compounds 1 and 4 obtained
as described above were mounted on Pyrex filaments with epoxy resin.
General procedures for crystal alignment, unit cell determination, and
refinement and collection of data on the Enraf-Nonius CAD-4 diffrac-
tometer have been published,39 while details specific to the present study
are presented in Table 1. The raw intensity data were corrected for
Lorentz and polarization effects, for decreases in the intensities of the
monitor reflections,40 and, in the case of 4, for absorption using ψ
scans41 on several reflections with ø near 90°. For 1, the space group
was uniquely determined by the systematic absences observed in the
final data set, while for 4, the choice was made on the basis of intensity
statistics. Direct methods provided locations for a significant number
of atoms in 1, while the molybdenum atom in 4 was located from a
sharpened Patterson function. The completion and refinement of both
of the structures were accomplished with successive cycles of difference
Fourier syntheses followed by full-matrix, least-squares refinement. As
is evident in Figure 2a, two of the tert-butyl groups appear to suffer
from a degree of positional disorder, but this could not be satisfactorily
resolved into separate alternate locations for the methyl carbon atoms.
Hydrogen atoms were placed in calculated positions riding on the
attached carbon atoms with isotropic displacement parameters 20%
larger than those of the attached atom. All calculations associated with
structure solution and refinement were performed with the SHELXTL-
PLUS42 program package.
1
1982 s, 1912 s, 1895 s. H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.32 (d, 2H,
Ar), 7.10-7.19 (m, 5H, N-phenyl), 7.02 (d, 2H, Ar), 1.14 (s, 18H,
tert-butyl), 1.20 (s, 18H, tert-butyl). 31P{1H} NMR (121.4 MHz,
CDCl3): δ 138.1 (s). MS (FAB, m/z) 844.
Synthesis of [Mo(CO)3{η3-PhN(PF)2{(-OC6H2(tBu)2)(µ-S)((tBu)2-
C6H2O-)}-KP,KP,KS}] (4). A solution of [Mo(CO)4NBD] (0.087 g,
0.29 mmol) in petroleum ether (5 mL) was added dropwise to a
suspension of 2 (0.183 g, 0.29 mmol) also in petroleum ether (5 mL).
The mixture was heated to 50-55 °C for 1 h, after which the deep
brown solution was allowed to come to room temperature and was
then filtered. The filtrate was concentrated to 3 mL and when cooled
to -20 °C, it gave 4 as analytically pure, yellowish-green crystals.
Yield: 64% (0.15 g). Mp: 155 °C (dec). Anal. Calcd for C37H45F2-
MoNO5P2S: C, 54.75; H, 5.58; N, 1.72. Found: C, 54.63; H, 5.55; N,
1
1.69. IR (Nujol, νCO, cm-1): 1987 s, 1918 s, 1894 s. H NMR (300
MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.38 (d, 2H, Ar), 7.12-7.22 (m, 5H, N-phenyl), 7.09
(d, 2H, Ar), 1.11 (s, 18H, tert-butyl), 1.21 (s, 18H, tert-butyl). 31P-
1
{1H} NMR (121.421 MHz, CDCl3): δ 132.1 (m), | JPF + 3JPF| ) 1116
Hz. MS (FAB, m/z) 811.
Synthesis of [RuCl2{η2-PhN(PCl)2{(-OC6H2(tBu)2)(µ-S)((tBu)2-
C6H2O-)}-KP,KP}2] (5). A solution of the ligand 1 (0.067 g, 0.1 mmol)
Acknowledgment. We thank the Department of Science and
Technology (DST), New Delhi, for financial support of the work
(34) Davies, A. R.; Dronsfield, A. T.; Haszeldine, R. N.; Taylor, D. R. J.
Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1973, 379-385.
(35) Bennett, M. A.; Pratt, L.; Wilkinson, G. J. Chem. Soc. 1961, 2037-
2044.
(39) Mague, J. T.; Lloyd, C. L. Organometallics 1988, 7, 983-993.
(40) Harms, K.; Wocadlo, S. Program to Extract Intensity Data from Enraf-
Nonius CAD-4 Files, University of Marburg, Germany, 1987.
(41) North, A. C. T.; Phillips, D. C.; Mathews, F. S. Acta Crystallogr.
1968, A24, 351-359.
(36) Hoffman, P. R.; Caulton, K. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1975, 97, 4221-
4228.
(37) Drew, D.; Doyle, J. R. Inorg. Synth. 1972, 13, 52.
(38) Drew, D.; Doyle, J. R. Inorg. Synth. 1972, 13, 48.
(42) Bruker AXS. SHELXTL-PLUS, Version 5.1, Madison, WI, 1997.